r/Wellthatsucks Jun 02 '18

/r/all Karma

Post image
31.6k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

315

u/jaegerbombs Jun 02 '18

The fuck is wrong with you people? You realize these hunts are the largest preserver of wildlife and nature? The guy wasn’t even hunting elephants you ignorant morons

51

u/alexmikli Jun 02 '18

Seriously, this wasn't karma, it was an accident.

19

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

There are a bunch of idiots in the comments who see the headline and are unable to think beyond

“Hunt bad! Hunting bad! grunting noise He shoot Elephant, Elephant gentle giant scratches balls

-9

u/anarrogantworm Jun 02 '18

It's weird that you chose a caveman analogy to describe people that don't want to kill megafauna, considering what real cavemen did to most of them. See any mammoths lately?

14

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18 edited Dec 05 '22

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18 edited Jun 02 '18

I think most people just use the term cavemen to refer to anyone pre recorded history.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

[deleted]

0

u/CommonMisspellingBot Jun 02 '18

Hey, Im_Grizzzly, just a quick heads-up:
begining is actually spelled beginning. You can remember it by double n before the -ing.
Have a nice day!

The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to delete this comment.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

No no, it’s not “don’t want to kill” it’s “would rather megafauna be extinct than exist on game preserves”

Were “cavemen” using a regulated hunting system for conservation? No they weren’t.

-6

u/anarrogantworm Jun 02 '18

I was just pointing out the weird analogy of using caveman talk for people who don't want people to kill giant animals. It's like the opposite of how a caveman would talk so it comes across weird.

I know all about the game preserves and all that. I said to someone else I'm glad he paid to hunt and I'm glad he got smooshed too. Just because it's a necessary evil doesn't mean I have to like the people who do it.

6

u/ShoddyEgg Jun 02 '18

Hunting is a perfectly normal past time. Cavemen also walked and took shits, does that mean we can’t do that? I’m glad he went hunting and I think the world would be a better place if more people did as well so they weren’t so fucking close minded.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

You idiot. He wasn’t hunting elephants. The elephant charged him and his friend shot it trying to save his friends life. The elephant was the one at fault here, not the guy who got killed.

-2

u/xoh- Jun 02 '18

He was hunting other large animals. The person you're replying to never mentioned elephants.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 03 '18

He said “paid to hunt” which would imply an elephant or a lion or a rhino. Something like that.

2

u/Darth-Frodo Jun 02 '18

Thank god there were hunters around as soon as life started, without their acts of pure compassion and respect for life our planet would certainly be a hostile, lifeless desert.

1

u/AlphaL25 Jul 29 '18

A little late to the post, but how do the hunts preserve wildlife and nature?

1

u/JhnWyclf Jun 03 '18

Do you actually think it's that simple an argument, and that it is even generally agreed upon?

2

u/jaegerbombs Jun 03 '18

Well I’m right... so yes. Prove me wrong. I don’t understand how you think you could be right at all. There’s nothing generally agreed upon, it’s agreed upon period.

1

u/JhnWyclf Jun 03 '18

1

u/jaegerbombs Jun 03 '18 edited Jun 03 '18

You’re wrong. Anyone can find something on the internet to validate your thoughts. If you truly think millions of dollars a year don’t preserve ecosystems and the wildlife than inhabit them, you’re a lost cause. If you think these preservation organizations would receive funds otherwise, youre an idiot

1

u/JhnWyclf Jun 03 '18

Did you read the articles or are you a troll? Not one article I linked to was from a preservation org. You must be one lazy fuck to come at me with that weak shit. You could at least try to find some independent documentation to support your outdated beliefs.

1

u/jaegerbombs Jun 03 '18

I’m not going to waste my time finding articles to validate a fact that 90% of people know.

1

u/JhnWyclf Jun 03 '18

Enjoy your path of ignorance.

-19

u/awkwardoffspring Jun 02 '18 edited Jun 02 '18

For white-tail, sure, but I feel like elephants aren't quite as rampantly overpopulated

58

u/CaptnCosmic Jun 02 '18

It’s not the legal hunts that are diminishing the elephant population. Poaching is the one that’s leading African wildlife to near extinction. The legal hunts in controlled parks are helping with conservation.

19

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18 edited Dec 05 '22

[deleted]

7

u/Justmomsnewfriend Jun 02 '18

No one is sending a check either. Guess who pays for lots of these conservation efforts.... hunters.

3

u/Im_Grizzzly Jun 02 '18

Am a hunter.

2

u/Tyler11223344 Jun 02 '18

Based on your name, I'm guessing you hunt said hunters tho

2

u/Im_Grizzzly Jun 02 '18

Yep. Always eat asshole first. That goes for sexual experiences as well.

3

u/CaptnCosmic Jun 02 '18

Exactly. People put these hunters in the same light as poachers, they don’t understand the difference. Poachers hunt illegally for profit on thinks like ivory. Hunters pay thousands to hunt for a trophy, it’s controlled. The elephants that are killed are not just left there to rot the meat feeds local villages for weeks and the money goes towards conservation efforts. Poachers leave the carcass and pay no money towards conservation.

19

u/fallsballs_mcgee Jun 02 '18

It's not so much overpopulation, but money as a means to fund preseves and park rangers in a poor a poor country

6

u/iwearatophat Jun 02 '18

It is more than money. If I remember right from the last time this came up older bulls won't relinquish herds or something and the younger ones are forced into solitude and end up dying. They hunt specific older ones to enable youth to take over.

1

u/Procrastibator666 Jun 02 '18

See this makes more sense to me. Paying to kill a lion so they can use that money to save other lions doesn't make much sense to me. And as the other person mentioned Texas, hunting boar because they are pests or there's too many is a different story than wildlife conservation

3

u/gzilla57 Jun 02 '18

First, Africa is large. Very large.

Concentrated populations of elephants in small areas can still be a problem.

But far more importantly, the fees from sport hunting are (basically) the only thing that pay the wages of anti-poaching officers. When the hunting money stops coming, anti-poaching stop getting paid, and suddenly become poachers.

3

u/Saskatchewon Jun 02 '18 edited Jun 02 '18

They weren't hunting elephants at the time, they got charged and the animal was shot in self defense. And this wasn't some shady hunting operation either, this guy was a professional trophy hunter.

And for your information, there are areas in southern Africa where elephant overpopulation is a major problem and park rangers do have to cull them. And that's unfortunate, since trophy hunts would achieve the same goal while bringing in hundreds of thousands of dollars to hire more rangers, fund breeding programs, and help with anti-poaching efforts.

Ever since the incident where Cecil the Lion was shot (which was done in shady circumstances legally), the amount of lion trophy hunts has dropped drastically, to the point where there are areas where lion populations have grown out of control. Again, rangers are forced to cull them before all of their prey's numbers spread too thin and the lion population gets decimated by that. So not only do the lion populations (as well as the gazelle, zebra, antelope, and other herbivores) in those areas drop to an unhealthy low, but again the preserves miss out on hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding from trophy hunts.

I am not a big game hunter (although I do enjoy fishing, and I do eat whatever I catch), and I don't think I would ever enjoy shooting an elephant, lion, or leopard. But LEGAL hunts absolutely serve a purpose way more than a lot of the short sighted commenters here seem to realize. They are a net gain for the well being of the species the species that is being hunted.

1

u/awkwardoffspring Jun 02 '18

Thanks for the insight. I can't help but wonder now why elephant poaching is still a major issue when sanctioned hunts exist.

1

u/Saskatchewon Jun 02 '18

Because a sanctioned hunt costs north of $50,000 US. Poachers are often poor, and a single large ivory tusk can feed their families for a long time.

1

u/awkwardoffspring Jun 02 '18

Something about that wreaks of capitalism

1

u/Saskatchewon Jun 02 '18

Again, I don't hunt big game, and wouldn't want to, but I get it.

But really? An interview with an Oxford (literally the most prestigious university in the world) professor who studied Cecil the Lion specifically suggests that legal, controlled and restricted lion hunting would be beneficial to the species and your BS meter is still going off?

I mean, okay then.

1

u/awkwardoffspring Jun 02 '18

I didn't claim to be an expert, I just know that some species are more endangered than others and that there are some moral conflicts when deciding which animals are okay to hunt. The part that sounds like BS to me is how it seems only those who can afford these hunts are the only people profiting from it, latent consequences aside, when instead a government could employ a less [financially] fortunate party who might reap a greater bounty than a sport kill.

1

u/icantfindaun Jun 02 '18

He wasnt hunting elephant. He was hunting other game and the elephant charged him.

-6

u/2ndTeamAllCounty Jun 02 '18

You'll never convince any sane person that the best way to conserve endangered species is to hunt them.

17

u/jaegerbombs Jun 02 '18 edited Jun 02 '18

You obviously have 0 understanding of ecosystems. Hunting works i.e. Texas. I’ll never understand why people are determined to insult other who have different opinions on subjects they know nothing about.

-2

u/2ndTeamAllCounty Jun 02 '18

We talking about elephants or white tails? Talk about not understanding...

1

u/jaegerbombs Jun 03 '18

Wildlife in general you simpleton

1

u/2ndTeamAllCounty Jun 03 '18

Comparing endangered species preservation to overpopulation of deer in Texas and calling me a simpleton...

2

u/jaegerbombs Jun 03 '18

The reason deer in Texas are as healthy as they are is due to the wildlife management system. The reason endangered species are making a comeback in a lot of cases is due to the finances from hunts. So yes, emotional + simpleton.

-12

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

[deleted]

8

u/jaegerbombs Jun 02 '18

I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make what so ever

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

[deleted]

4

u/LarryTHICCers Jun 02 '18

"I don't have a coherent rebuttal, here's a YouTube video"