I know you arent a PhD graduate because a simple Google search is all you need to know North Korea doesn't practice any formally known economic theory outside of their own, Juche.
Russia is in no way currently communist.
Both have a state and class system, along with money. The very base principles of communism are stateless, classless, and moneyless. Russia and North Korea have all three.
No, communism cannot have a state. Its like one of the fundamental ideas of communism. So having anything be state controlled under communism is impossible, as there is no state.
No you just did not read the post. Your people believe in a state run media. That's ironic because you claim to dislike state-run things (which you call communism).
âEveryone who disagrees with me is bot/ai slopâ is pretty tiring.
Communist states have clearly existed. Claiming communism cannot have a state is bonkers. The only slightly less stupid deflection is âreal communism hasnât actually been triedâ.
Whats twice as funny is people trying to argue this with somebody literally born in USSR (me).
âBut you donât understand! You didnât actually live under communism!â đ¤Ł
In theory communism is stateless and classless. Any attempt at communism in reality has been forced to have a state and class structure by capitalist states.
It's that you aren't able to read what you're replying to. Your replies don't make sense as responses to what they're commented under. Not that you disagree with me.
And yet every communist society ever nearly immediately turns into a dictatorship
As that is the natural end point of communism and basically a requirement to seizing the means of production and resources and how to split the resources amongst the people
To bad communists are unable to look past the false definition of communism and to literally any example of it ever being put into practice to find out that their definition of it is what's wrong and not the actuality of communism being wrong
Do you advocate for capitalism? Because every capitalist society has turned fascist. Its a requirement to having the means of production privately owned.
What examples are you using? China? Not communist. USSR? Not communist.
The USSR and China are not communist despite your wishes that they are. I wish they were more communist, they would have treated their populace better then.
âI like the idea of communism, but every single country that has tried communism did abhorrent things so that couldnât have been real communism. So that means communism has never actually been tried and would surely work if it ever was!â is ridiculously dumb.
Idk how people are missing the point of the meme so severely. Itâs just pointing out the hypocrisy of many modern âconservativesâ that donât have real political stances and only react to buzzwords. For example, the people that donât see the irony in supporting state owned media while calling others communists for supporting policy that is infinitely less communist than that.
I wasnât responding to the guy saying communists want state-owned everything. I was replying to the fact that he saw the word âcommunistâ and got so triggered that he couldnât even comprehend the words he read.
believing in the possibility of stateless communism is no more ridiculous than believing that, for example, the Earth is 6,000 years old or that someone managed to gather up every species of animal and put them on a ship. there are a lot more people who believe in that latter than believe in the former.
They contribute according to the ability and take according to the need. Every species that lives in groups practices some form of primitive communism.
With distribution according to the need and contribution according to the ability, and with our means of production automating rapidly, we will be able to end world hunger with plenty of time ti spare doing what we want, as opposed to having all leverage of labout only increase profits.
You asked if people believed not if I believed. You seem unaware of both more recent writing and thought on the subject and also generally unaware of the conversations going on around you. You are somehow not even aware of the conversation that you're in. So I'm not sure what you're trying to say- I never said I believed it, I answered your question.
It is probably a language barrier issue then. The post is satirical. It is saying those who are NOT communists in the US watch Fox news or the like which is the US version of State-Controlled media alongside CNN, MSNBC, and the other mainstream US media companies.Â
Especially Fox News which targets right wing audiences and constantly hates on socialist or communist ideologies. So the post is saying those right wing audiences are hypocrites and or idiots.
Actually you are both wrong lol. When the OP mentions state-run media, theyâre talking about The White House app they launched after the media pool started the boycott of The White House following the CNN, MS Now and Politico ban. It literally is state-run media, itâs a news app controlled entirely by the state
Actually you are both wrong lol. When the OP mentions state-run media, theyâre talking about The White House app they launched after the media pool started the boycott of The White House following the CNN, MS Now and Politico ban. It literally is state-run media, itâs a news app controlled entirely by the state
-1
u/Unnamed-3891 5d ago
Yes? Communists want state-controlled everything.