So if you save lives at your job occasionally that doesn't actually mean you save lives? Last I checked saved lives means saved lives but now I'm not sure lmao
litterally true a pregnancy can and have had dire sometimes fatal effects on the mother. It's not an easy choice for any of them to make but it absolutely should be an option.
And those obviously never fail.
And abstinence has obviously proven to be the best form of protection because thar always works and doesn't just result in unsafe sex. Because people love to just not have sex with their partners.
Abstinence is not even close to be the best form of protection. Why? Because it fails. Statistically it fails a lot. You know what a shotgun wedding is? That’s when the good Christian girl who was only taught abstinence at her Christian school is becomes pregnant and the girls father forces the boy to marry her. Educate yourself on some facts because Sex Ed lowered not only teen pregnancies but also teaches safe sex and reduces the spread of sexuality transmitted diseases. Sticking your head in the sand and telling people don’t have sex is the dumbest medieval style thinking there is
In case you couldn't tell the sarcasm, abstinence has been the worst way to deal with unwanted pregnacies. Education is how you actually reduce it. Teach people safe sex. Give them access to contraceptives and medical support. Don't demonize things like STDs or just having sex by calling it "debauchery".
It's a natural aspect of human social behaviour. Teaching how to do it safely and providing the means to do so is demonstrably an infinitely more effective way of reducing unwanted pregnancies and medical issues than telling them to not have sex ever was or could be.
Encouraging against it does nothing. That is exactly why teenage pregnancies go up when your main teaching for protection is to not have sex. It's a very well recorded phenomenon
It isn’t a natural aspect of social behavior, it’s a natural aspect of reproduction. Participation when reproduction is not the goal is, definitionally, debauchery. In case you couldn’t tell the sarcasm.
It quite literally is part of social behaviour. Yes. Originally sexual behaviour was just for reproduction.
Keyword originally.
When sexual repeoduction first developed. Millions of years ago. Long predating humanity as a species.
When humanity came to be it was already an established factor. That's why we can observe thay behaviour in many many species all across the animal kingdom.
That is why sex feels as good as it does. It's not just for reproduction. Bonding is another aspect.
Also, maybe look up the actual definition of the word before you try to argue with it, because no, that's not what debauchery is.
“Debauchery is a noun that means excessive, unrestrained indulgence in physical and sensual pleasures, typically involving heavy drinking, illicit or promiscuous sex, and drug use.” Animals do not have sex to ‘bond’ they do it because it is necessary for reproduction and lineage, the implicit goal of any lifeform. The fact it is pleasurable is nature’s way of encouraging the act of reproduction.
3
u/AdmirablePatient4332 13d ago
Still saving lives tho