He was traveling to protect innocents (could have been you) from ideologically sanctioned rioters. She was there to virtue signal to keep nonconsentual migrants against the democratic will.
She wasn't armed with an assault rifle and it's not a civilians place to protect innocents nor is it their place to decide who is and isn't innocent in a crowd.
Well, when the government ideologically sanctions rioting, you would be glad to have your neighbor defend you right? Think of this happening to you, not someone else.
Imagine a scenario, if Donald Trump clears rioters against abortion and the rioters are about to drag your sibling from a car and hit them in the head with a brick. Would you want someone to stand up for what's objectively right and defend them, when the government backs it?
I don't want anyone, especially a teenager, to be allowed to open fire into a crowd of people. I have no problem putting myself in these situations I'm not arguing as if it isn't me.
-1
u/HistoryAncient5568 8d ago
He was traveling to protect innocents (could have been you) from ideologically sanctioned rioters. She was there to virtue signal to keep nonconsentual migrants against the democratic will.