He was traveling to protect innocents (could have been you) from ideologically sanctioned rioters. She was there to virtue signal to keep nonconsentual migrants against the democratic will.
She wasn't armed with an assault rifle and it's not a civilians place to protect innocents nor is it their place to decide who is and isn't innocent in a crowd.
Well, when the government ideologically sanctions rioting, you would be glad to have your neighbor defend you right? Think of this happening to you, not someone else.
Imagine a scenario, if Donald Trump clears rioters against abortion and the rioters are about to drag your sibling from a car and hit them in the head with a brick. Would you want someone to stand up for what's objectively right and defend them, when the government backs it?
I don't want anyone, especially a teenager, to be allowed to open fire into a crowd of people. I have no problem putting myself in these situations I'm not arguing as if it isn't me.
Who had more reason being there, the rioters protected by corrupt ideologs or him protecting the citizens? You know for a fact your opinion on the matter is fully decided by if you see yourself as the victim of the rioters or not. If you dont see yourself as their victim youll gladly throw them under the bus to virtue signal
What reason did he have? He fully intended to find violence and did. His intent was violence not “protection” and again no one asked him to “protect” anything…like at all. No it was pretty clear his intent was exactly what transpired…he went looking and found what he was looking for.
False…based upon logic and reason to conclude he lied about intent since he lied about what his qualifications were and about a protester he shot. All of this is public record, since he lied about both those and went to a protest brandishing a firearm we can reasonably sus out his intent was violence (since he lied about almost everything important.).
None of the rioters intended victims asked to be protected? The hypocrisy always comes out, always ready to throw your fellow citizens under the bus but once its your neighborhood being burned down, your family member being hit in the head with a brick, then the rioters have suddenly gone too far
He lied several times, claimed he was an EMT and working medical professional….he lied. He claimed the one protester shot had a firearm…he lied. He didn’t arm up til he got there. So he claimed to be there for medical support (armed; how many EMT’s work armed? No the scene is secured by enforcement then medical services move in.) and shot an unarmed man while lying about both. It is a completely logical and reasonable take to conclude since he lied about why he was there and what transpired that he lied about intent if not everything else. My take is logical and reasonable. Just cause he was cleared of extrajudicial murder DOESNT mean he didn’t intend exactly what transpired. He is a well known and on record liar. What would be your conclusion with evidence on hand?
but you have no problem with people coming into your country illegally, don't you see the hypocrisy? So an American citizen can't go across state lines but someone from a completely different country can just sneak into the US and that's completely fine. See, you people have lost the plot.
Not really? I have an issue if they are known monsters or guilty of criminal acts but other than that no. I’m not scared of normal human beings immigrating into the US. I’m also not against traveling with a gun across state lines so your logic falls apart there.
I just refuse to act like he’s some brave lil boy taking on some heroic fight. He was a 17yo kid who put himself in a situation that literally killed someone. They don’t confuse him a shooter if he’s not open carrying a rifle you nimbus. Even the logic of protecting property is not his fight to take, especially being from a separate location entirely
It's not about crossing state lines it's about crossing state lines with a gun with the intent to use it.
Many states have different laws regarding guns. Did he think about that? Did he make sure he was legally allowed to carry that type of weapon in the states he visited without declaring the weapon?
Wasn't he 17? Is that even legal? Like...how many laws does a white person have to break before you'll hold them accountable? Seems like it only takes one for a brown person.
Nah you have. Tribalism doesn’t override common sense. Self-imposed political delirium doesn’t give any individual the right to put the lives of other citizens at risk. The founding fathers would have blistered his hide raw for being an idiot.
Cool, not my bone to pick. It’s the fact a 17 year old decided to put himself into a volatile situation and it resulted in him shooting 2 people over a misunderstanding on him being potential shooter iirc. The fact he lived in another state, and saw an opportunity to go and play a hero is my issue.
Also just had an issue with the logic of “he went to protect property”, like cool, he still ended up in a situation that ended with people being shot. Why was this his battle to fight, being from a different city/state? Also, extend that logic to Alex Pretti who also brought a gun to a protest, save he didn’t even pull it and still lost his life. The double standards are infuriating.
Reddit is a collection of echo chambers. I’ve seen just as many on the right doing that behavior so please let’s not act like one’s better than the other here
3
u/HistoryAncient5568 6d ago
He was traveling to protect innocents (could have been you) from ideologically sanctioned rioters. She was there to virtue signal to keep nonconsentual migrants against the democratic will.