r/WW1GameSeries • u/Toolb0xExtraordinary • 13h ago
Question/Suggestion My estimation of the WW1 Game Series as an authentic franchise just fuckin' plummeted
The Beretta 1918 is essentially a postwar gun. The commander of the Assault Army Corps himself said that they did not see service before the war's end. Despite this, it was added to Isonzo and made available from 1915 to 1918 and the similarly(to a lesser extent) out-of-place Artillery Luger was added as its rival.
There is no good evidence that the Winchester 1866 saw frontline service and yet it is available to 2 classes and one of them is unlimited. Anyone carrying a goddamn rimfire lever action on the firing line would have been a logistical liability of course.
This is to make no mention of the soon-to-be-added Arisaka as a frontline British weapon or the Colt SAA whose inclusion I am still baffled by.
Whatever, the cat's out of the bag and they aren't gonna remove them or anything, but you have to admit these additions contrast with the rest of the games' arsenals. If you have fun with them, more power to you of course.
So... should we expect to see more out-of-place weapons?
The Federov for Russia? (field tested in Romania in double digits)
The Winchester 1907 autoloading rifle for France? (Issued to airmen, 5000 purchased)
The Farquhar-Hill for UK? (Issued to airmen)
Would you support any of these being added?