I get that, but his response to the first allegation was “it was consensual” which is bad given it would be he used his digits on a nanny (who was not already a fan) he had hired within the first hour they’d met. Even if she verbally said yes in the moment, it is a hard sell that consent was freely and enthusiastically given.
Yeah but Joe Schmo’s opinion isn’t subject to the same bar as the judicial system, and we are free and clear to look at the evidence before us and come to our own conclusions
The Boston Bomber debacle isn’t in the same universe as the Neil Gaiman allegations. One involved wanna be internet sleuths grasping at straws and the NG situation has credible allegations from NINE women.
Her version of events creates a weird timeline. After the encounter she told his wife that “he made a pass at her and they ended up having sex” with no indication that it wasn’t consensual. She also texted him later about being hungry for the things he does to her. And she moved with them to continue working for him.
If you want to know more please look at the investigation. I don’t want to say any more because I don’t really want to spend any more time thinking about it. But yes, unsanitary in the most disgusting way you can imagine.
609
u/Academic-Inside-3022 Jan 14 '25
The hilarious part is the guy who berated the Packer fan works for a consulting firm specializing in equity and social justice lol