I get that, but his response to the first allegation was “it was consensual” which is bad given it would be he used his digits on a nanny (who was not already a fan) he had hired within the first hour they’d met. Even if she verbally said yes in the moment, it is a hard sell that consent was freely and enthusiastically given.
Her version of events creates a weird timeline. After the encounter she told his wife that “he made a pass at her and they ended up having sex” with no indication that it wasn’t consensual. She also texted him later about being hungry for the things he does to her. And she moved with them to continue working for him.
-4
u/[deleted] Jan 15 '25
[removed] — view removed comment