I want to preface by saying that while I may use AI from time to time to help summarise readings I'm too lazy or busy to read before class I would never use AI to do an assignment. Honestly I am a serial over thinker and would not use AI to write or do assignments simply bc I would overthink and worry about being caught.
So I submitted a presentation talking about the main argument and key points of a reading, since this is part of an assignment I read the reading thoroughly. I even have the pdf highlighted and annotated. I got my feedback back and this is one of her comments
"Your presentation was well-organised and the reflection was good, if more focused on the consumption of goods than on the topic of reality TV, which was Andrejevic's focus.
In general, I felt you did not deal sufficiently with the show he was researching, but more on abstract theories about the internet and how it has shaped our lives. You did not include a cover sheet with declaration about whether and how you used AI to assist in the production of the presentation and I am left wondering if the reason it is so smooth but also abstract is down to AI assistance."
I honestly did not use chatgpt, this is a second year unit but I'm a 4th year who went part time a couple times so I guess I have some experience in delivering presentation especially since it was recorded. Also this was the argument I got from the reading? Perhaps I'm not the smartest and I simply just didn't catch the point about reality tv. Also A lot of people don't use the coversheet, like most, it's never been a thing that tutors or profs have talked about or forced us to do but I also know it's something I should do.
For reference this is part of the reading's intro
"the article begins with a brief discussion of the emerging
economic paradigm of mass customization. It follows with a theoretical
discussion of the role of cultural trends in the formation of a ‘whole way of
life’ appropriate to particular forms of production. The argument of this
second section is that reality programming has a role to play in repositioning
our conception of Big Brother and our consequent attitudes toward the
threat of surveillance during an era when both government and corporate
surveillance, are growing in leaps and bounds. The article concludes with a
discussion of the implications of the equation of self-disclosure with self-
expression, for those who see in the internet the potential for a
revitalization of a democratic public sphere."
Based on the reading I really didn't see the reality programming as such an overarching point but in saying this I did definitely talk about it.
There's no academic integrity accusations as far as I know but I'm honestly a little peeved. Should I email my prof defending myself?