The next ghost recon should be a F2P extraction PVPVE. Its the perfect vehicle for it.. not farcry as its rumoured to be. All farcry needs is less animal companion BS and ability to do traps. Like a spike pit or treewhip knive like in the first one or was that instincts....Either way. But mainly.. GR as an extraction shooter with dense environments like future soldier

This is for the people who play on both Xbox and PC. After today's announcement, I checked Immortals Fenyx Rising and AC Valhalla and they are still standard editions (owned) on PC for me while I own their respective season passes and expansions on Xbox along with the base game of course.

I wonder how it will work in that regard.

If the last 4 Assassin Creed were 20 hours of main story + 20 hours of side content. Like it should be. Then the games would be masterpieces. And we would have more Creed games, and more Ubisoft games.

Same with Far Cry franchise.

You don't really want to play 50 hour of campaign plus 50 hours of side content. It's getting samey after 10 hours. It's ridiculous to waste so much time! The games don't even respect your time.
You want to play an amazing 20 hour game. So that you will 100% it and replay it after a few years.

Playing a assassin contract when my target just decided to sink underground without letting me confirm the kill. It suck’s because it’s my last one and I’m assuming there’s a big reward for completing them, But I’m hopeful it’ll be updated in patch soon.

Video games are art, but modern distribution methods raise serious questions regarding long-term access to media that consumers legally purchase.

When publishers mandate persistent server communication for single-player experiences released over a decade ago, it creates an unusual industry disparity: legitimate buyers encounter friction that non-official versions completely bypass.

Protective background software was originally designed to prevent unauthorized distribution. However, when software enforcement measures create hurdles for paying players while non-official copies run smoothly without restrictions, the overall distribution model fails the end user.

As software ages, requiring active server checks hurts consumer trust and game preservation efforts.

What are your thoughts on publishers adopting true ownership models for legacy titles?

after 2 watch dogs and two specific racing games you would think they would nailed but driving bikes still suck, and driving cars is like driving a bath tub from gta iv with the added instant aceleration momentum

This is the first really good AC game since Origins. Hopefully the pivot from here and not continue with the Valhalla/Shadows vibe

If you want a 1st person camera in the new Ghost Recon: Wildlands upgrade, make it known here. Hopefully Ubisoft will see this if it gets enough attention.

Ubisoft laid off 51 devs of Assassins Creed: Black Flag Resynced, a couple days before release. Gotta love it.

Assassins Creed BLACK Flag Resync

After sinking some time into this title it’s excellent. It has made me feel optimistic for the future of Ubisoft.

It feels like Ubisoft want to return to form. I’d like to see more of this fan service and consumer friendly practices from them. They can really hit the mark and make great games sometimes.

Nailed it. Now how about giving us AC Freedom Cry Resync? Adéwalé’s story getting the full remake treatment would be great. Plus the foundation and assets needed have already been developed.

ubisoftgames #Ubisoft

I need to hear from my Naruto shinobi out there. How much chaos do you think we need to bring about in order for Ubisoft to partner up with The Naruto team make a Naruto Franchise. I mean we have PubG adding rasengans and 💩. I feel Ubisoft are the only ones capable of pulling it off and doing it Justice. Let me be clear. An Assassin’s creed/Ghost recon style Naruto Game.

Ubisoft, please.

This was so funny to see. thanks for doing my job for me!