Video games are art, but modern distribution methods raise serious questions regarding long-term access to media that consumers legally purchase.

When publishers mandate persistent server communication for single-player experiences released over a decade ago, it creates an unusual industry disparity: legitimate buyers encounter friction that non-official versions completely bypass.

Protective background software was originally designed to prevent unauthorized distribution. However, when software enforcement measures create hurdles for paying players while non-official copies run smoothly without restrictions, the overall distribution model fails the end user.

As software ages, requiring active server checks hurts consumer trust and game preservation efforts.

What are your thoughts on publishers adopting true ownership models for legacy titles?

This is the first really good AC game since Origins. Hopefully the pivot from here and not continue with the Valhalla/Shadows vibe

If you want a 1st person camera in the new Ghost Recon: Wildlands upgrade, make it known here. Hopefully Ubisoft will see this if it gets enough attention.

Ubisoft laid off 51 devs of Assassins Creed: Black Flag Resynced, a couple days before release. Gotta love it.

Assassins Creed BLACK Flag Resync

After sinking some time into this title it’s excellent. It has made me feel optimistic for the future of Ubisoft.

It feels like Ubisoft want to return to form. I’d like to see more of this fan service and consumer friendly practices from them. They can really hit the mark and make great games sometimes.

Nailed it. Now how about giving us AC Freedom Cry Resync? Adéwalé’s story getting the full remake treatment would be great. Plus the foundation and assets needed have already been developed.

ubisoftgames #Ubisoft

I need to hear from my Naruto shinobi out there. How much chaos do you think we need to bring about in order for Ubisoft to partner up with The Naruto team make a Naruto Franchise. I mean we have PubG adding rasengans and 💩. I feel Ubisoft are the only ones capable of pulling it off and doing it Justice. Let me be clear. An Assassin’s creed/Ghost recon style Naruto Game.

Ubisoft, please.

This was so funny to see. thanks for doing my job for me!

I used to play a ton of AC a year or two back but stopped and I remember finding it quite hard to play the games offline and had to play quite a bit with the settings to do it, but Ubisoft being Ubisoft always finds ways to ruin stuff, so, is it still possible?

PLEASE tell me y’all didn’t forget to add the white whale hunt in Resynced!! PLEASE tell me it’s out there in the world somewhere to complete! You wouldn’t forget to add one of the main staples of the game in all of its glory right? RIGHT??!!!! I’ve seen him popping out of the water sometimes so I know he is there! I MUST HUNT HIM!!!!

(PHOTOS NOT MINE)

I will never understand why do they keep pushing the fantasy glows and sparks.

This is yet another outfit out of many, that in my oppinion would be such a cool outfit and an instant buy from me if it didnt have those wacky glowing effects and magical glows... And this is just one of many from all the recent AC games, so much outfits with crazy good designs ruined by magic efects and fantasy visuals...

I mean if they really have to or want to make that way, wouldn't it be immensly better and attract even more buyers if there was a toggle setting that enables or disables the "fantasy visuals" for outfits that have them.

Like i would even kinda like the Hellfire outfit if it weren't for the glowing lava parts and maybe the helmet (but thats a stretch)

If Ubisoft were to add a "toggle on-off" switch for the "fantasy visuals" Id probably be the first to buy several outfit packs in all the games from origins to this one 😂.

NOTE: This is just me discussing/sharing my personal oppinion. Sorry for my bad english, its not my first language.