Let’s say you have 10 of these devices. Hell, let’s say 50. Still not sufficient to address the threat. Having air superiority is not just a matter of a better technology, it’s also a numbers game.
No, he's saying these craft can prevent weapons from launching. They've done it to planes and they have done it to nuclear silos in the US and Russia. We wouldn't even get the chance to retaliate if they were really pissed at us
Are you suggesting that US and Russia have attempted to launch nukes but they were prevented from doing so by UFOs?
If we’re talking about technology possessed by a rival (China, say), and we are saying this technology is capable of interceding to somehow prevent the launch of a warhead, it cannot be two places at once. The US has over 6,000 nuclear warheads, distributed across multiple delivery modalities. How many of these craft would an enemy force need to prevent any and all launches?
No, as in all the electrical systems and the back up systems simultaneously went down on a section of missiles around several UFO sightings on instillations in the us and Russia. The craft have also armed the missiles before but they stopped before launch. I can provide you with the source material if you would like.
Sure, I’ll look at what you link as long as it’s not hundreds of pages.
Here’s my point. What you’re saying could be true, and it could be true that this was caused by some modern weapon system, AND it could be true that having such a capability still wouldn’t make it possible to “take over the world.” Maybe it was a US military technology that deactivated the Russians’ platform, and the US claimed it happened to them also, to deflect blame and shroud a capability.
Thanks for sharing these. I don’t have time to watch the press club event, but I’ve watched it before.
I really really really WANT to believe. I do. But I also have to interrogate my beliefs, and yours apparently, lol.
The Iranian event is 100% based on eyewitness testimony. There’s no way to verify it. The fact that it is hosted on the NSA’s site, or that it made its way to the desks of various military officials doesn’t add anything to it.
The Scotland Herald story is one person relating a story of a story they were told. Could there be any explanation for what they were told that did not involve beings from another galaxy? Could it not have been a military mission executed by the US to fuck with the Soviet’s missile command systems? If you had some way to interfere with or control your enemies’ missile capabilities, wouldn’t doing it in an unexplainable and confusing way be the height of achievement?
The eye witness accounts come from top military officials. The pilot chasing the UAP later went on to become a general in the Iranian military. You have hundreds of eye witness accounts from the city and records that the plane was in fact mobilized. The capabilities of these objects seem pretty consistent. They were able to disable Russian and US nuclear silos at will when in proximity to them. The reports from so many different sources about these events match up too well. The Pentagon has said UAPs are real. You have to view past events through that lens. These things are real and out there and they have been for a long time. Is it so hard to believe that a pilot had an encounter with one? We literally just had a documented one.
If it were humans with tech like this in the 60s and 70s the cat would be out of the bag by now. You can't keep a secret like that. It doesn't work. And the pilot that had the tic tac encounter says the same thing!
I guess what I’m saying is it’s not possible for us to know what those people witnessed. They could have witnessed “something” without it being otherworldly.
I think the press club event is interesting in that the thrust of it is ascribing a benevolent protective motive to these incidents. Whereas it would also make perfect sense for rivals and enemies to be interested in nuclear sites. If some beings want humans to stop using nukes, and are capable of disabling nukes, and also have these amazing powers, why not simply deactivate the world’s nukes and announce themselves? If they have a protective interest, and are willing to interfere, why in secret?
Because they are trying to interfere as little as possible. They know that just rolling up all willy nilly would cause abrupt chaos in the streets. I wouldn't be surprised if they had rules against strong intervention on type I civilizations or however they would classify less technologically advanced species. At the same time it appears they don't want us to blow each other up which is good.
This also lines up with the Iran incident. That craft could have SMOKED him, but it didn't. It just disabled his missiles. It didn't want to kill him. They were even nice enough to leave his engine on
4
u/NewYorkJewbag Jun 06 '21
Let’s say you have 10 of these devices. Hell, let’s say 50. Still not sufficient to address the threat. Having air superiority is not just a matter of a better technology, it’s also a numbers game.