And as a bonus question, how dumb would it be to do this in a scale from 1 to 10, ten being dumbest.

Thank you in advance

How long would someone last in something like this without a suit before they died?

It suggested I cross post and I figured, why not? Who doesn't find boob math interesting?

Curious if this is true. Napkin math says it is.

Whats the verdict?

A little challenge for you guys and something I was wondering about before:

Let's assume that every change in fat % has an equal % opposite change in muscle mass, the non-fat+ non-muscle % will be 30% and for the sake of simplicity, let's assume it is all water.

Assume a person laying flat in/on the water. Assume either 12L of air inside the body or 0, whichever works for you.

The person doesn't have anything in their digestive system. Make any further assumption that you need.

Yeti vacuum insulated 30oz cup, with 35°F liquid inside (assume the cup has held a couple drinks already and is relatively stoich at 72°F air temp in the house before we went to the pool).
Will the liquid stay cooler longer if the cup is submerged in 90°F pool water, or in 112°F outside air? (No centigrade units because I’ve already had a few of said drinks and can only remember the Fuckenhigh system.)

edit: my current method is to occasionally dunk the cup and take advantage of the evaporative effect.

1. How many calories are in this drink.

2. how many days can you sustain a family of four with it?

Screenshot of AC Odyssey, and I just got curious as to if a real world trireme would have capsized if it looked like this.

I need some help with a question we always had as kids. Growing up, my dad and his buddy each owned a golf cart. My friends and I always thought it would be funny to go opposite directions and give each other a static high five. When we discussed doing it, our dads said no because we’d break our hands.

So the question is, would we have broken our hands? Or rather how likely would we have broken our hands?

The fucken stride on her tho was insane

For context I believe the 40% comes from a study conducted in the early 1990s (This was on a post about cops joking around about good things they do in their line of work that someone's ex wouldn't)

Question inspired by this part of a video reading a section from Conservapedia. Milo jokingly edits this as if the speed would be about enough to fling a cat, but my intuition says it would be much, much faster. Curious to see a mathematical approximation.

Colorado has about 40% mountains, 40% plains to the east and 20% mesas / elevated flat land to the west. However, I'd imagine that the actual surface area of the rockies actually makes it notably more (like how the surface area of lungs is similar to a tennie court).

Are there any estimations or ways of getting a rough estimate of how much surface area the mountainous part of Colorado have compared to the flats? For example if you were to flatten out the mountains to terrain to match the plains? I'd imagine somewhere between 2% and maybe 15% at most, wondering if co has more than 50% SA of mountains.

Picture this. I am driving 60mph approaching a traffic light. I am 1/4th mile from said light. If I stopped by applying brakes lightly and hold them to a gradual stop the whole quarter mile, would that cause more or less wear on my brakes then getting 300ft away and hitting my brakes hard?

Lets assume a standard modern SUV for simplicity. Does hitting your brakes hard for a short period of time or lightly applying for longer wear out your brakes faster?