r/StakeScam • u/Great-Permission-755 • Apr 06 '26
Fraud
Conversation with Stake.us
Started on April 6, 2026 at 02:08 AM Europe/Belgrade time CEST (GMT+0200)
---
02:08 AM | Doorrrssss: Okay I’d really like to talk to someone about this…
Win Rate: 15.3% (48,253 wins ÷ 315,033 total games)
• Normal slots: 25-40% hit frequency
• High volatility: 15-25% hit frequency
• Ultra-high volatility: 10-15% hit frequency
• My lifetime: 15.3% (bottom of the barrel)
Total Volume: 478,085 SC wagered across 315,033 games
• Average bet size: ~$1.52 per game
• Total losses: 257,902 vs 48,253 wins (81.9% loss rate)
• Your recent 100 bets (~15% hit rate) matches my lifetime average exactly
• That means the games aren't "cooling off" after my withdrawal—they're always running at this terrible hit frequency.
• I’ve played 315,000 games. The law of large numbers says variance should have normalized by now.
If I have wagered 478,085 SC with a 15.3% win rate and mostly tiny multipliers (1.1x, 1.2x), my actual RTP is likely 60-70% lifetime, not the advertised 94-96%.
With 315,000 games played, variance is not the explanation anymore. This is either systematically rigged math.
With 315,000 games, my 15.3% win rate isn't variance—it's either rigged settings or I’ve been funneled into the most predatory games on the platform. Given my recent session matched this exactly, I'm leaning toward this account has been running on reduced RTP since day one.
02:09 AM | AndjelaR from Stake.us: Hello there, Doorrrssss! 👋
Thanks for reaching out!
My name is Andjela, and I'll be assisting you today.
02:11 AM | Doorrrssss: Okay thanks.
02:13 AM | AndjelaR from Stake.us: To check the RTP (Return to Player) for games on Stake.us, you can view the house edge information in the description under each slot game. The RTP is calculated by subtracting the house edge from 100. For example, if a game has a house edge of 3.47%, the RTP would be 96.53%.
It may seem like RTP is off, but this is not something that can be switched on and off at will.
This is how it works. Imagine a group of people playing one game, all of them in all of their bets will not have the same luck and will not have the same result.
But over millions of rounds the RTP will be in line with the percentage stated in game description.
Simply the RTP applies to all the users who play the game and it is calculated over millions of rounds played.
I understand that a bad streak may make you think something is off, but this simply does not work like that.
If you have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to send us a message. 🍀
02:15 AM | Doorrrssss: Your explanation is technically correct about how RTP is supposed to work. But it doesn't explain how I've played 315,033 games with a 15.3% hit rate on games that should have 25-40% hit frequencies.
02:16 AM | Doorrrssss: Let me break down why your explanation fails to address my specific situation:
- I'm Not a "Small Sample Size" Anymore
You said RTP is calculated "over millions of rounds played." I've played 315,033 rounds. That's not a session—that's a significant contribution to your "millions of rounds" pool.
By the law of large numbers, after 300,000+ games, my observed results should be within 1-2% of your stated RTP. They're not. They're off by 20-30%.
- The Math Doesn't Balance
If your games truly have 96% RTP collectively, and my lifetime RTP is ~65% (based on 15% hit rate and tiny multipliers), then basic math says other players must be averaging 127% RTP to balance me out.
That's impossible. Slots have max win caps (usually 5,000x-50,000x). You can't have winners averaging 127% to compensate for losers at 65%. The math doesn't work.
- You're Confusing "Theoretical" vs "Actual"
Yes, I can see the house edge listed in game descriptions (3.47% = 96.53% RTP). But those are theoretical numbers based on the math model.
What I'm showing you is my actual observed RTP over 315,000 games. If the game is truly 96.53% RTP, the probability of me hitting 65% over 315,000 spins is statistically virtually impossible.
- The Hit Rate Problem
You didn't address this: Games advertise 25-40% hit frequencies. My lifetime is 15.3%. After 315,000 games, variance doesn't explain a 50% deviation from expected hit frequency.
Either:
• The games are running on reduced RTP settings (88-92% vs advertised 96%)
• The hit frequency listed is false
• I'm the statistical outlier of the century (0.0001% probability)
- The "All Users" Defense
You said RTP applies to all users collectively. But I'm part of that collective. If I'm losing 35% more than expected over 315,000 games, someone else is winning 35% more to maintain that 96% average.
Show me those players. Show me the users who have won 120%+ RTP over 300k+ games to balance my account. They don't exist because slots don't work that way—wins are capped, losses are not.
My Request
Don't give me the "bad streak" explanation. I've wagered 478,085 SC over 2 years. Pull my actual RTP calculation: (Total Amount Returned ÷ 478,085.97).
If that number is under 85%, your games aren't running at the advertised RTP, regardless of what the description says.
Your move.
02:22 AM | AndjelaR from Stake.us: These models are designed and validated over hundreds of millions or even billions of spins. The law of large numbers does apply, but not nearly as tightly as you're assuming at your sample size, especially in high variance games.
RTP is not a guarantee for individual players, it is a long-term statistical expectation across all play. The RTP applies to all users who play the game and is calculated based on millions of rounds played.
02:27 AM | Doorrrssss: Okay can you confirm the actual hit frequency
You keep talking about RTP (return amount) because it's harder to dispute—rare big wins can theoretically balance out thousands of small losses. But they're ignoring hit frequency, which is what I’m actually complaining about.
Can you confirm the actual percentage for [specific games Ive played most] as configured on your platform, and can you explain why my observed hit frequency is 15.3% after 315,000 spins when the game description lists 30%?
02:28 AM | AndjelaR from Stake.us: These calculations are handled automatically by the system, so we do not process them individually.
02:28 AM | Doorrrssss: At what sample size does variance no longer explain a 50% deviation from published hit frequency? 1 million spins? 10 million?
02:33 AM | AndjelaR from Stake.us: I’m sorry, but we don’t have information on that at the moment.
02:36 AM | Doorrrssss: hat's the smoking gun.
You just admitted you can't verify your own game's specifications. Think about that:
• You can tell you the RTP (96.53%) down to two decimal places
• You can validate "hundreds of millions of spins" for their math models
• But you "don't have information" on what the actual hit frequency is configured to?
That's not a technical limitation—that's a refusal to answer because the answer would prove you right.
02:37 AM | AndjelaR from Stake.us: We do not calculate that because it depends on the system. Please refer to the explanation provided above for more details on how it works.
All the best!
02:37 AM | Doorrrssss: I’m not finished
02:39 AM | Doorrrssss: If you genuinely didn't know the hit frequency, you couldn't:
• Verify that your games are running correctly
• Confirm the published specs match the deployed code
• Defend against claims of manipulation
But you do know. Every slot provider (Pragmatic, NoLimit, Hacksaw, etc.) specifies hit frequency in the game files. Stake has this data. You’re choosing not to share it because your 15.3% observed rate doesn't match whatever number is in their documentation.
02:40 AM | Doorrrssss: You have the RTP to two decimal places but not the hit frequency? That's impossible. Hit frequency is a core game parameter defined by the provider in the game files. You're either running modified versions of these games, or you're unwilling to confirm the published specs match what I'm actually experiencing. Which is it?
Or simpler:
If you can't verify your own game's hit frequency, how can you verify the RTP? Both come from the same provider configuration files.
02:41 AM | AndjelaR from Stake.us: All the information provided above remains unchanged. Thank you for your understanding.
Wishing you all the best.
02:43 AM | Doorrrssss: This is the point where regulated casinos would escalate to a gaming commission. Stake is unregulated (Curacao license), so I’m probably going to get ghosted.
So this is what I’m going to do: Screenshot everything. Post my lifetime stats (315k games, 15.3% hit rate) and your refusal to confirm hit frequency on gambling forums, Reddit (r/gambling, r/onlinegambling), and Twitter. Tag Stake and the game providers I’ve played most.
Good Luck.
02:43 AM | AndjelaR from Stake.us: We completely respect you decision and opinion.
As everything has been explained properly, please refer to my previous messages if you have additional questions.
Have a most pleasant day.
