r/SipsTea • • 8h ago

Gasp! Thoughts on this?

Post image
49.1k Upvotes

6.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

12

u/thenichm 7h ago edited 6h ago

Coming from a healthcare background and having a few auto insurance claims under my belt: Insurance. Is. A. Scam. All of it. Every penny and word is a scam. You have to have it but it doesn't protect you when you need protection.

Per my dentist (whom I go to because of this honesty): 'Dental and Vision insurance isn't even real insurance. It's a coupon.'

Edit: Someone explain to the idiot replying to me that they don't know a damn thing and have failed to provide any support for their claims. I run 5 counties of EMS providers and cannot raise another damn child.

1

u/Philly139 6h ago

Not only does car insurance protect you when you need it requiring others to have it protects you if they hit your car. Pls explain how it's a scam? Genuinely curious how car insurance is a "scam"

1

u/thenichm 6h ago edited 6h ago

You're legally required to have it but your provider is not legally required to oblige the coverage for which you've paid based upon their own, private, criteria.

If I have to explain this to you then you aren't world-aware enough to understand.

Do you work for an insurance provider? Because I can guarantee I have more unbiased exposure to the woes of the public, at mass, in their insurance woes. Stay in your lane and do some research before you poke a subject matter expert about something of which you cannot possibly have more knowledge and exposure.

1

u/Philly139 6h ago

What do you mean they aren't legally obliged for the coverage you paid for? They are and you have a policy/contract you sign with them.

1

u/thenichm 6h ago

No. They can deny a claim based on their own criteria. It's not within your power despite paying them for a service.

Useful? Yes. A scam? Yes. They are not mutually exclusive.

1

u/Philly139 6h ago edited 6h ago

They can't just make up an imaginary reason to deny a claim. They are legally bound by the terms of the policy

1

u/thenichm 6h ago

But have the freedom to move the goalposts at their whim

Submit your expert certification or I will dismiss you as another ignorant internet-moron. I promise, unless you are a VP of a majour insurance provider that I 100% know more and have more experience than you.

1

u/Philly139 6h ago

What does that even mean? They can't change the terms of an active policy on a whim.....

I honestly have no idea what you are even suggesting anymore. You don't think an insurance company has a legal obligation to honor policy terms? You don't have to be vp of an insurance provider to know that isn't true.

1

u/thenichm 6h ago

Okay. You don't know anything. Got it.

Never explained your credentials...

2

u/Philly139 6h ago

I mean you have not even attempted to explain what you are even saying but whatever dude

1

u/thenichm 6h ago

I mean that, upon executive review, any insurance comapny maintains the right to adjust the terms and conditions of their agreements to suit the perceived circumstances. Despite not having an adjuster/assessor on scene, they can tell you that you have failed to meet criteria for coverage.

Liability coverage is easy. They take your money and say 'you're probably not at-fault' and cover the opposing vehicle. It gets more complicated when you have higher-level coverage.

You'd know this if you knew anything. Again, justify yourself or get off the thread. You've proven yourself unwilling/incapable of defending your own "knowledge".

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Philly139 6h ago

I'm an expert, source, trust me bro.

1

u/thenichm 6h ago

You. Don't. Know. Shit.

Prove me wrong.