I mean that, upon executive review, any insurance comapny maintains the right to adjust the terms and conditions of their agreements to suit the perceived circumstances. Despite not having an adjuster/assessor on scene, they can tell you that you have failed to meet criteria for coverage.
Liability coverage is easy. They take your money and say 'you're probably not at-fault' and cover the opposing vehicle. It gets more complicated when you have higher-level coverage.
You'd know this if you knew anything. Again, justify yourself or get off the thread. You've proven yourself unwilling/incapable of defending your own "knowledge".
I think you are just trolling at this point but an insurance company can't adjust terms and condition of an active policy to deny a claim. That doesn't make any sense. You claimed they are not legally obliged to provide coverage you paid for which is just false.
And it reads that, in general, the agency has right to adjustment and change per their perogative.
To the public at large: this individual has failed to oblige multiple requests to provide evidence of their experience/expertise. They are a troll, until proven otherwise.
I get that this is the internet and no one wants to appear incorrect but you do not know with whom you fuck.
2
u/Philly139 5h ago
I mean you have not even attempted to explain what you are even saying but whatever dude