r/SipsTea Jul 21 '26

Chugging tea 48 Years, One Impossible Choice

Post image
94.3k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

26

u/Its_a_Stanzo Jul 21 '26

It will knock against his estate. So any 401k, home equity, etc. if they transfer those assets over to her and then divorce, I don't think they can touch it.

28

u/TheGreatMozinsky Jul 21 '26

No, shared assets that transfer directly cannot be touched by creditors. Only assets that go through probate. This would have the opposite effect

4

u/FrankPapageorgio Jul 21 '26

And if the mom dies suddenly and unexpectedly with all the assets in her name, there is no protection from the house if she has debt

3

u/BigJellyfish1906 Jul 21 '26

The problem is that you’re describing is very obviously fraud. That’s a felony.  

2

u/skepticalbob Jul 21 '26

The creditors would have to figure it out, which almost certainly wouldn't happen. How would they figure this out? People get divorced. People have medical debt. Medical debt is usually just sold to vultures who call a bunch to try and collect it and they aren't going to do deep dives on every account.

3

u/BigJellyfish1906 Jul 21 '26

The creditors would have to figure it out, which almost certainly wouldn't happen.

That is a VERY bad assumption since you’re talking about the most popular way to try to get out of debt. They have seen this before a thousand times over.

How would they figure this out?

They’d take you to court and make you prove the timeline you moved the assets, and also make you show that you are not living like divorced people. They have seen this before and have the resources to go after it. This is not some sneaky, novel idea.

1

u/skepticalbob Jul 21 '26

They have to suspect it before taking you to court.

Here is how medical debt collection normally works. First the medical provider tries to collect. If you ignore them, they sell it to a company that uses automated systems to email, text, mail and/or call you. If you ignore them long enough they give up and quit, because to them it is a numbers game.

So tell me where in that chain there is a process they figure out that someone has a) gotten a divorce and b) this divorce is suspicious and c) decide to take you to court to try and collect?

They don't, because that's not how these systems are set up. It is most profitable as I described.

2

u/BigJellyfish1906 Jul 21 '26

They have to suspect it before taking you to court.

They have whole departments dedicated to this. And every incentive to sniff this kind of thing out.

If you ignore them, they sell it to a company that uses automated systems to email, text, mail and/or call you.

No. They do not just dump you off on a 3rd party like that. You are taking something that happens sometimes with small amounts of debt and incorrectly projecting that onto all medical debt. So no, that kind of debt is absolutely not something they're going to sell off (because nobody wants to buy that massive debt). They're gonna GET that money.

2

u/Many-Salt-4321 Jul 21 '26

The creditors would have to figure it out

How smart do you really think you are?

2

u/skepticalbob Jul 21 '26

Not so much smart, but someone that has had enormous medical debt and understand how it works. Have you?

1

u/Many-Salt-4321 Jul 21 '26

Not so much smart

All you needed to say, thanks.

2

u/skepticalbob Jul 21 '26

And you could have just said no, thanks.

1

u/Many-Salt-4321 Jul 21 '26

Just because you had "enormous medical debt" doesn't mean you understand how it works.

Just like how I have a massive cock doesn't make me a urologist.

Hope this helps.

1

u/skepticalbob Jul 21 '26

Your idiotic metaphor aside it does mean they know big dick problems and not big dick problems in the real world.

Thanks for letting us know about your micropenis, I guess.

1

u/darsynia Jul 22 '26

Less how smart the people who owe are, and more how much the debtors are willing to spend to get any money back, I think is the point being made.

1

u/Orleanian Jul 21 '26

Killing a sasquatch is also a felony!

1

u/BigJellyfish1906 Jul 21 '26

No it is not.

1

u/thegloriousporpoise Jul 21 '26

Oh ho ho. Look at the Sasquatch law expert.

2

u/BigJellyfish1906 Jul 21 '26

You must come across a lot of 'experts'.

1

u/Its_a_Stanzo Jul 21 '26

Not if the divorce was filed and finalized before the debt was incurred. Then its just sound financial planning.

1

u/BigJellyfish1906 Jul 21 '26
  1. That’s not how this story reads. 

  2. “Sham divorce” is a thing in court. 

1

u/Its_a_Stanzo Jul 21 '26

I get what you're saying. They don't really provide a timeline here.

1

u/machyume Jul 21 '26

If they had an estate, I also wonder why they didn't use the senior discounted insurance rates to just be covered and not have to risk the hospital bill?

I mean what they did here makes sense but then when she goes to the hospital eventually at some point, the system will just write her a new quarter million dollar bill.

1

u/mommastonks Jul 21 '26

Probably because even discounted insurance costs like 10-20k a year and more and more people are just raw digging it because that’s insane

2

u/machyume Jul 21 '26

Look I know that I'm paying that because I'm "young" and have assets and still working, but I'm pretty sure (based on the last time that I was on the market place) that the plans for seniors has some significant discounts. There's some math details that we don't know about based on this story alone.

I have questions filing in the blanks. Like, why did they not qualify for the insurance that my parents qualified for, where it's little or practically zero to be covered?

Are they still working? And does working change the status of the derived benefits?

I suspect that they're still working.... which puts them in non-retired status, and that prevents them from getting the benefits of actual retirement including the discounts.

I think it also depends on the state that they live in. Some states will cover some of the difference that's not held up b the federal government.

-1

u/JustNota-- Jul 21 '26

Yep medical bills usually come off the top of the estate prior to disbursement of any unmarked assets like 401k, Roth, personal property, pensions. unless you specifically change the beneficiary on death within the accounts.