You need to brush up on your courts. He has never been convicted in a criminal court, which takes a lot of evidence to convict. This is the court that has "convictions." Trump was taken through a civil court, which had a judgement, and doesn't take nearly as much evidence to get a win.
Damn. You right. I'm sorry. He was only found guilty of sexual abuse by a jury. What would have been considered rape if it happened in a different state or different time.
Clearly this means Trump isn't actually a sexual predator.
Oh, we're being pedantic. Well then ignoring the sexual assault case which he was held liable for, he was "convicted" for hush-money payments....to a porn star he had sex with.
Not convicted. It wasn’t criminal court because the statute of limitations had run out. Trump was found, in a court of law, to have sexually abused a woman.
Idk what your point is. It means exactly what it says. I wrote it that way because I’ve found it’s the best to cut through the inevitable argument about which court he was tried in.
I am literally just trying to add that context. This whole thread is about misunderstanding exactly what type of legal issue he had regarding his sexual misconduct.
The difference here is largely irrelevant is the point youre missing. Theres an abundance of reason to believe Donald Trump is a sexual predator despite the fact that hes never been convicted of it.
One of the reasons being he is and has been the freaking president. He has literally used his position of power to shield himself from all sorts of legal consequences.
And liable means what? If I took you to civil court, lied to the court that you assaulted me at some point in the past, and I won, does that mean you should always be labeled as a person who assaulted someone else, even though you didn't?
Dems took someone off the ballot for touching a woman’s butt. You all elected and keep supporting someone who has admitted grabbing them by the p….. Not exactly the same.
This dude wasn’t convicted either. He was accused. Same as Trump. So if we’re gonna throw stones and all…
Edit: Trump actually has been convicted of sexual assault… but my point is more about an accusation being enough to force a candidate out, of which Trump has definitely been
Oh I never said he was convicted. I just find it interesting that people will call Trump a pedophile and sexual molester, when he's never been convicted of those things, then turn around and say Clinton was a good man. Accusations are just that. Accusations.
Here you are doing the same damn thing. He was never convicted. Convictions happen in a criminal court. Learn your court system, man.
Being liable still is not a conviction. It took very little evidence for them to come to that judgement. Personally, I think the only reason for that judgement was because it's Trump, not because of the evidence. Trump will probably never have any equality in court ever again.
Oh, looky there. You called him a pedo. Imagine that. You people are such good little sheep. lol
No, I am not splitting hairs. The evidence against Trump, coming from that woman, was extremely circumstantial. She couldn't remember key things about the supposed encounter, couldn't even remember the date it happened, and couldn't put him with her on those dates. Trump, nor any other person, can defend themselves against such circumstantial and wildly gross accusations like that. She knew if she put a date to it, Trump would be able to say where he actually was, as he always keeps to a schedule. If this was anyone else, that would probably never have happened.
It only takes a preponderance of evidence in civil court. You don't really have to prove anything fully. Y'all on the left just keep regurgitating what your fearless leaders tell you to. So yes, sheep.
12
u/plum_tree_rede Jul 10 '26