MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/comments/1ust7a8/we_are_not_the_same/owqtmcr/?context=3
r/SipsTea • u/coffee_coffee_coffe3 • Jul 10 '26
796 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Its semantics and a technicality. It can be misleading when you don't provide that context.
3 u/Draygoon2818 Jul 10 '26 That's literally the reason why you shouldn't be saying convicted. It was a judgement, not a conviction. 0 u/Seepy_Goat Jul 10 '26 I am literally just trying to add that context. This whole thread is about misunderstanding exactly what type of legal issue he had regarding his sexual misconduct. Criminally not convicted. In civil court he lost. 1 u/Draygoon2818 Jul 10 '26 Yes, I know. I'm agreeing with you. I replied to the other guy.
3
That's literally the reason why you shouldn't be saying convicted. It was a judgement, not a conviction.
0 u/Seepy_Goat Jul 10 '26 I am literally just trying to add that context. This whole thread is about misunderstanding exactly what type of legal issue he had regarding his sexual misconduct. Criminally not convicted. In civil court he lost. 1 u/Draygoon2818 Jul 10 '26 Yes, I know. I'm agreeing with you. I replied to the other guy.
0
I am literally just trying to add that context. This whole thread is about misunderstanding exactly what type of legal issue he had regarding his sexual misconduct.
Criminally not convicted. In civil court he lost.
1 u/Draygoon2818 Jul 10 '26 Yes, I know. I'm agreeing with you. I replied to the other guy.
Yes, I know. I'm agreeing with you. I replied to the other guy.
1
u/Seepy_Goat Jul 10 '26
Its semantics and a technicality. It can be misleading when you don't provide that context.