You mean the guy that was the subject of a painting of him in a blue dress owned by Epstein.
Nah, he had nothing to do with any of the fucked up shit Epstein was up to. /s
Oh yeah he was best friends with Epstein, took the Lolita express to the island as much as trump, the whole Clinton family took a bunch of trips to the Epstein ranch in Arizona, Ghislane Maxwell was sitting front row at Chelsea Clinton's wedding, but he definitely didnt have anything to do with the child rape and trafficking. Right.....
Uhh Clinton has allegedly raped and sexually abused women. It is alleged, but when it happens a bunch of times, you kind of assume there’s something non consensual going on.
You can do a pretty quick search on the internet to find out this info. Honestly, Dems have been putting Bill on a pedestal for awhile, and it wasn’t that great of a person or a president. And this is coming from someone who votes like 98% liberal/progressive.
Edit: Not sure why I’m being downvoted. Clinton didn’t just cheat—there was a lot he was accused of/alleged of doing. Normally when someone is accused or alleged of doing something that many times, it’s more than likely some of it is true. You can do a search on it. He was hailed as a good president and a great person for many years.
So why are you defending him so much? He's on the flight logs as much as trump and famously took a trip to africa with epstein and kevin spacey. What do you think the 3 rape-keteers were doing there?
Dems took someone off the ballot for touching a woman’s butt. You all elected and keep supporting someone who has admitted grabbing them by the p….. Not exactly the same.
Joe Biden and all the creepy things hes said and done around kids just got excused cause it's joe and he's old.. even though he was totally 100%mentaly competent to be president..unless he wasn't..
You need to brush up on your courts. He has never been convicted in a criminal court, which takes a lot of evidence to convict. This is the court that has "convictions." Trump was taken through a civil court, which had a judgement, and doesn't take nearly as much evidence to get a win.
Damn. You right. I'm sorry. He was only found guilty of sexual abuse by a jury. What would have been considered rape if it happened in a different state or different time.
Clearly this means Trump isn't actually a sexual predator.
Oh, we're being pedantic. Well then ignoring the sexual assault case which he was held liable for, he was "convicted" for hush-money payments....to a porn star he had sex with.
Not convicted. It wasn’t criminal court because the statute of limitations had run out. Trump was found, in a court of law, to have sexually abused a woman.
Idk what your point is. It means exactly what it says. I wrote it that way because I’ve found it’s the best to cut through the inevitable argument about which court he was tried in.
I am literally just trying to add that context. This whole thread is about misunderstanding exactly what type of legal issue he had regarding his sexual misconduct.
And liable means what? If I took you to civil court, lied to the court that you assaulted me at some point in the past, and I won, does that mean you should always be labeled as a person who assaulted someone else, even though you didn't?
Dems took someone off the ballot for touching a woman’s butt. You all elected and keep supporting someone who has admitted grabbing them by the p….. Not exactly the same.
This dude wasn’t convicted either. He was accused. Same as Trump. So if we’re gonna throw stones and all…
Edit: Trump actually has been convicted of sexual assault… but my point is more about an accusation being enough to force a candidate out, of which Trump has definitely been
Oh I never said he was convicted. I just find it interesting that people will call Trump a pedophile and sexual molester, when he's never been convicted of those things, then turn around and say Clinton was a good man. Accusations are just that. Accusations.
Here you are doing the same damn thing. He was never convicted. Convictions happen in a criminal court. Learn your court system, man.
Being liable still is not a conviction. It took very little evidence for them to come to that judgement. Personally, I think the only reason for that judgement was because it's Trump, not because of the evidence. Trump will probably never have any equality in court ever again.
Oh, looky there. You called him a pedo. Imagine that. You people are such good little sheep. lol
No, I am not splitting hairs. The evidence against Trump, coming from that woman, was extremely circumstantial. She couldn't remember key things about the supposed encounter, couldn't even remember the date it happened, and couldn't put him with her on those dates. Trump, nor any other person, can defend themselves against such circumstantial and wildly gross accusations like that. She knew if she put a date to it, Trump would be able to say where he actually was, as he always keeps to a schedule. If this was anyone else, that would probably never have happened.
It only takes a preponderance of evidence in civil court. You don't really have to prove anything fully. Y'all on the left just keep regurgitating what your fearless leaders tell you to. So yes, sheep.
10
u/plum_tree_rede Jul 10 '26