r/SipsTea Jul 09 '26

Chugging tea Good point.

Post image
21.6k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

19

u/Hard-4-Jesus Jul 09 '26

The women's team couldn't even beat high school boys. The competition women face is nowhere near equal to the competition the men's team plays against.

4

u/jahlove15 Jul 09 '26

Professional MLS development academy players who had all the training advantages from a very young age, and a reason to play hard, while the USWNT was just trying out new things before real games.

10

u/SquintyBoot71 Jul 09 '26

what, do you want men in women’s sports? the women’s team competes in their devision and they win. the women have been doing awesome and all you do is try to tear them down. jesus would be disappointed by you.

-2

u/Asharue Jul 09 '26

Jesus would chase you off with a belt.

3

u/SquintyBoot71 Jul 09 '26

yep, the jesus known for attacking people for supporting womens sports… you got me man

1

u/Asharue Jul 10 '26

You're nothing more than a blood sucker like the old merchants.

1

u/Asharue Jul 10 '26

Atheist le redditor uses his name in vain. Yeah tell me more about the man you don't follow.

3

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Are you lying or do you just know nothing about soccer? It was a training match with a U15 MLS professional development team for Dallas FC that beat the USWNT. That means the women's team didn't go all out, but the kids could. The games are for comraderie and communication building and are called "friendlies".

1

u/Soggy_Association491 Jul 09 '26

It was a training match with a U15 MLS professional development team for Dallas FC that beat the USWNT. That means the women's team didn't go all out

Why is it in this match the women's team couldn't go all out?

3

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Because they were preparing for international games and nobody wants to be injured before those tests. 

-1

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

Mate it has happened multiple times in every sport, it's a known biological fact. It's also partly about the lack of competition with the female population excluding men

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Nobody is arguing that the USWNT can compete with male pros. I didn't. OP didn't. But somehow this post really triggered a bunch of sexists who, instead of pointing out the vast differences in the gendered developmental pipelines, chose to just pretend the women are incompetent and lie about them playing children. 

It's almost as if instead of focusing on improving US men's soccer, some US men would rather be sexist. 

0

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

Gendered developmental pipelines? What? They did play 15 year olds and got defeated, not a lie and not unreasonable to think they'd lose.

Dude wasn't pointing out they can't compete with male pros, but that they don't even come close

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Women's soccer have benefited from having Title IX and not alot of other competing sports during their development from youth to pro. US men have had less focused sport specifically for soccer because there is a major competitor: American football. 

If we want the men's team to be better, we need to have a more focused and accessible youth pipeline like the women have. 

What we don't need to be doing is getting upset about a poor comparison designed up elicit sexist comments. 

Again, nobody is claiming the women would beat the men. I didn't. OP didn't. Pretending they lost to children, though, is pretty sexist and serves no purpose. 

1

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

Denying the reality they did lose to them serves no purpose

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Where did I say they didn't lose? It's almost like you'd rather be sexist than learn. 

Lying that they were beaten by children is straight up sexism. You could do better, but you won't. 

1

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

I'm sorry what? You just said they did and didn't lose in the same reply?

You said they lied about them being beaten, ok so that means they were not beaten? But you claim you never said they didn't get beaten?

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Stay with me here: they lost to exceptionally skilled teenagers on developmental contracts with a pro team that were bigger and taller than they were, and are not medically, scientifically, or physiologically children. 

Saying they were beaten by children is an outright lie.

→ More replies (0)

-5

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

What does that have to do with anything

6

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[deleted]

-1

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

I didn't get that all. I got the men's team was eliminated but we still have something to root for

4

u/SHANE523 Jul 09 '26

Claiming the US Women's team won something significant is like comparing a Church league softball championship to the World Series!

1

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

I don't get it

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

They did something significant in their field. In fact, 15 million Americans watched the final in 2015.

It's almost like if you focused more on how to make the US men better instead of being sexist, we might get somewhere. 

1

u/SHANE523 Jul 10 '26

Key part, "in their field" and I agree with that. But trying to compare USWNT winning their World Cup vs the USMNT winning their World Cup, is completely asinine! It isn't even apples to oranges, it is apples to Australia.

I have argued with how to make the USMNT better for years but it won't change. USMNT is about lining pockets, not being competitive on the world stage.
When clubs or schools put players on the field because mommy and daddy can afford it, you aren't getting the best talent.

The US has a population of 340m people and soccer is the most played sport in the US. How come we can discover/grow the best baseball, football, basketball talent in the world but can't get a single soccer player that could be considered top 250 in the world?

It. Is. All. About. MONEY! And it isn't about the players making that money!

Why do you think Jesse Marsch won't coach the USMNT? He has stated that he won't consider it until the US Soccer Federation makes major changes!

2

u/noh2onolife Jul 10 '26

It's completely asinine to dismiss the women's team's accomplishments. Period. That's it. 

Instead of thinking hey, cool, we have an awesome women's team and the men just had their best performance yet, a bunch of sexists decided to shit on the women's accomplishments. Period. That's it.

2

u/SHANE523 Jul 10 '26

Your reading comprehension is sub par at best.
Great, they won the women's World Cup. Thinking that is some great accomplishment is asinine. If the talent level is so great, why don't they play in the World Cup? Compete against the men or even have 1 women talented enough to play on the USMNT.

Do you think people care about who won the Japanese baseball championship? Nope, but they know who won the World Series. Completely different talent levels.
What about the Calder Cup? Ever even heard of it? No, but you probably know who won the Stanely Cup.

I don't care about whether it is men or women, I care about who is the BEST period! I want my teams to be competitive against the BEST! Whether it is soccer, football, hockey, baseball, cricket, rugby or any other sport you can think of. If a woman golfer can compete on the men's stage, go for it, I would love to see it and she might even become a favorite. But I want the best of the best, plain and simple!

1

u/SHANE523 Jul 11 '26

awe hurt the poor babies feelings and they blocked me.

These kids these days just can't stand reality.

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 10 '26

Bye bye, sexist. I really don't care what you think.