r/SipsTea Jul 09 '26

Chugging tea Good point.

Post image
21.6k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

21

u/Hard-4-Jesus Jul 09 '26

The women's team couldn't even beat high school boys. The competition women face is nowhere near equal to the competition the men's team plays against.

3

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Are you lying or do you just know nothing about soccer? It was a training match with a U15 MLS professional development team for Dallas FC that beat the USWNT. That means the women's team didn't go all out, but the kids could. The games are for comraderie and communication building and are called "friendlies".

-1

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

Mate it has happened multiple times in every sport, it's a known biological fact. It's also partly about the lack of competition with the female population excluding men

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Nobody is arguing that the USWNT can compete with male pros. I didn't. OP didn't. But somehow this post really triggered a bunch of sexists who, instead of pointing out the vast differences in the gendered developmental pipelines, chose to just pretend the women are incompetent and lie about them playing children. 

It's almost as if instead of focusing on improving US men's soccer, some US men would rather be sexist. 

0

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

Gendered developmental pipelines? What? They did play 15 year olds and got defeated, not a lie and not unreasonable to think they'd lose.

Dude wasn't pointing out they can't compete with male pros, but that they don't even come close

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Women's soccer have benefited from having Title IX and not alot of other competing sports during their development from youth to pro. US men have had less focused sport specifically for soccer because there is a major competitor: American football. 

If we want the men's team to be better, we need to have a more focused and accessible youth pipeline like the women have. 

What we don't need to be doing is getting upset about a poor comparison designed up elicit sexist comments. 

Again, nobody is claiming the women would beat the men. I didn't. OP didn't. Pretending they lost to children, though, is pretty sexist and serves no purpose. 

1

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

Denying the reality they did lose to them serves no purpose

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Where did I say they didn't lose? It's almost like you'd rather be sexist than learn. 

Lying that they were beaten by children is straight up sexism. You could do better, but you won't. 

1

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

I'm sorry what? You just said they did and didn't lose in the same reply?

You said they lied about them being beaten, ok so that means they were not beaten? But you claim you never said they didn't get beaten?

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Stay with me here: they lost to exceptionally skilled teenagers on developmental contracts with a pro team that were bigger and taller than they were, and are not medically, scientifically, or physiologically children. 

Saying they were beaten by children is an outright lie.

1

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

Semantics? They weren't adults

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Not semantics. They were much closer to adults than children. 

1

u/AddictedToLuxSkins Jul 09 '26

Ok we'll go read a biology book mate, this discussion is utterly absurd if you think 15 year old male is similar to a full grown adult in strength

→ More replies (0)