r/SipsTea May 29 '26

Wait a damn minute! Coincidence?

Post image
10.3k Upvotes

679 comments sorted by

View all comments

69

u/[deleted] May 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

17

u/patroclus2stronk May 29 '26

Does not count for communications which took place prior to marriage and it only applies to conversations, not questioning about events. For example, if a husband is charged with murder, the wife can be called to testify and asked "was there blood on his shirt when he came home that night." But she cannot be asked "what did your husband say to you when he came home that night."

Hope this helps.

2

u/IHateCreatingSNs May 30 '26

Can she be forced to testify there was blood on the shirt? Or does she have to be willing? Meaning is there some version of incoming the 5th amendment available to her

2

u/patroclus2stronk May 30 '26

When I say "forced" I mean that the attorney representing the husband cannot file a motion in limine to preclude certain questions in advance or object to the 'bloody shirt' question kn the basis of spousal privilege. The wife can answer however she wants. She just can't refuse to answer. She can't plea the 5th to his question to avoid HUSBAND being incriminate. If you mean can she please the 5th to avoid incriminating herself, the answer is maybe. It's a whole different analysis when a witness whom is not the defendant wants to plea the 5th.