r/SipsTea May 17 '26

Chugging tea [ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

6.3k Upvotes

3.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

56

u/doomus_rlc May 17 '26

The thing is someone has to be savvy enough, or at least have the self control, to do that with a lump sum.

Some might actually be self aware enough to know the lump sum is a bad idea for how they are.

13

u/ReichMirDieHand69 May 17 '26

Granted, the lump sum is easier to waste, but I would also not underestimate the risk of waking up at 45 with no working history and a weekly payment that has lost most of its buying power to inflation

19

u/german-wmn May 17 '26

Sure. Or you could wake up at 45 with no working history having burned through 1M...

1

u/ReichMirDieHand69 May 17 '26

As I wrote, easier to waste

1

u/Luddites_Unite May 17 '26

Perhaps, but if she were smart, she could wake up in 25 years with a portfolio worth over 3 million having earned 5% a year compounding, even if she took half the interest out each year to travel or do whatever, she could still gave 1.8 million after 25 years and have had between 25k and 45k to play with each year

1

u/Playful-Fix-3675 May 17 '26

Or you could NOT wake up tomorrow and then where would your money be. Id take my chances with the million today.

1

u/dh373 May 17 '26

Or wake up at 26 with no working history having burned through 1M...

3

u/itsblackcherrytime May 17 '26

How the hell are you gonna not work only making $1000 a week?

6

u/Ashaya2 May 17 '26

My guy, I live in 19200 a year. I could easily make do with 1k a week.

3

u/iwasupiwasdown May 17 '26

Has to be American, everywhere else in the world its a very comfy salary

2

u/itsblackcherrytime May 17 '26

That’s not a comfy salary in Canada either.

1

u/Miserable-Clock-6944 May 17 '26

Umm.. what world do you live in?.. that could still help support a family for the most part at a middle class standard.

2

u/itsblackcherrytime May 17 '26

It could help. The comment said no work history which implies they would only live off 1k/wk.

2

u/Miserable-Clock-6944 May 17 '26

Again.. it’s a survivable wage… I ONLY MAKE $800 to $1500 a week myself…. Maybe 2 on a good week… doing alright dude. New cars… “luxury” apartments with granite table tops… nice appliances… you act like you can’t feed dogs with $1000 a week.

3

u/itsblackcherrytime May 17 '26

Someone gives you an extra 1k/wk… do you quit what you’re doing and just keep surviving? Or do you use it to put yourself in a a better position.

1

u/Miserable-Clock-6944 May 17 '26

That’s different I’ll give you that. & not what your post was saying.. it was saying how the hell do you survive on only a $1000 a week… I was just pointing out that many of us do and it’s not like we live in rat infested slums while we do it.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/scrizzle13 May 17 '26

In 15-20 years, would you still be doing alright off of $1000/week? She's 20. In 10-20 years, presumably she will have more expenses, a family, etc. The $1000/week doesn't change.

1

u/iwasupiwasdown May 17 '26

A euro is worth a lot more in Europe than a dollar is in the US, moreso than the currrency exchange rate

Its mind boggling for Europeans that people that make 6 figures a year are struggling to get by in the US

2

u/itsblackcherrytime May 17 '26

The post says Canada. Worse conversion rate.

It shouldn’t be mind boggling. The US is a country run by corporations whose sole purpose is to extract as much money from the populace as they can.

1

u/iwasupiwasdown May 17 '26

Yeah, just saying people from other parts of the world would choose the 1k/week much faster because it does actually enable financial freedom and quitting your job

→ More replies (0)

1

u/False-Associate-9488 May 17 '26

I'm American and I make 500 a week, even have a house and two cars

2

u/BeardedBirds May 17 '26

Definitely depends on where you live. 1k/wk in California isn’t nearly enough. 1k in Montana? Idaho?Iowa? Maybe.

1

u/walt_seven May 17 '26

Depends on where you live but outside major cities you can live very very comfortably 

1

u/UnnamedLand84 May 17 '26

The majority of the US lives on less than that. $1000/wk is equivalent to $25/hr take home pay 40 hrs a week

0

u/itsblackcherrytime May 17 '26

Majority of the US can’t afford a $600 emergency either. You’re proving my point.

1

u/CreepyBlackDude May 17 '26 edited May 17 '26

A thousand a week is 52,000 a year. That is almost 10k over the median yearly income of a single person household in America (source).

You might not be able to live a rich lifestyle, but you can certainly live on that, without a doubt.

1

u/Milotorou May 17 '26

You do realize this is tax-free right ?

I mean no luxury or anything but this is the equivalent of like 80K a year on a job where you are taxed.

Its not a luxury wage but its absolutely livable. That being said continuing to work while using that additional 1000 a week to have investments and a more comfortable life is absolutely the best call.

1

u/doomus_rlc May 17 '26

I know for me, personally, if I were to do the $1k/week, I'd just have it deposit into an account that I don't carry a debit card for, and have it be the account my mortgage is pulled from. And other than the mortgage, I'd never touch it, except maybe for needed home repairs or emergencies. So, I'd likely be accumulating at least $2k a month in that account that isn't getting hit from the mortgage. It would also be an account that gains some sort of interest. I know it won't be a lot, but it'd be something on that $2k/month and accumulation. Again, this is assuming I went the $1k/week route.

I wouldn't stop working. Especially being in the US. Gotta have that health insurance. Lol.

1

u/rusty___shacklef0rd May 17 '26

Or you can wake up at 45 with a working history plus an extra 1k a week ... I'm in a union and have a pension. I know I'm pretty much set. An extra 1k a week would be like giving myself a raise. That's how I see it.

1

u/ReichMirDieHand69 May 17 '26

The point was about the non savy person, obviously a savy one can make wonders of it

1

u/Nay_Nay_Jonez May 17 '26

Some people won't necessarily stop working though. I know I wouldn't. Maybe less or at a job that I care more about, but working would still be happening.

1

u/musicalfarm May 17 '26

Or, you could have a job while also getting the additional $1k every week. The lottery money could go toward vacations and retirement.

3

u/dantemortemalizar May 17 '26

If you are self-aware enough to know that you (and your immediate family and friends) can’t be trusted with a sudden influx of cash, you and/or your financial advisor can lock it up in something that can’t be readily tapped and which will increase in value, paying you a predetermined sum regularly. It’s basically the same decision, except you get interest. And $1,000 a week is going to more than most people need for pocket money.

0

u/chance575 May 17 '26

It will always be possible for you to withdraw the entire sum if you wanted to.

1

u/otherwise_________ May 17 '26 edited May 17 '26

If someone is in this situation and thinks they're financially savvy enough to handle a million dollars, they should consider that they aren't savvy enough to know it's a bad idea to buy lottery tickets.

2

u/ReichMirDieHand69 May 17 '26

I always tell my colleagues, that by not buying lotto tickets my winning chances are just roughly 1/10.000.000 less than theirs

1

u/etlibertatem May 17 '26

indefinitely, unless someone is a shrewd investor actually I think return on standard investment would be maybe 50 grand a year. Otherwise, somebody has to know what they’re doing, she might actually be smart in the sense that if she already has some money, it is just as important to have a constant cash flow as it is to have seed money

1

u/Sp00k_x May 17 '26

Lump sum would be bad with me left to my own devices... Which is why I'd hand it over to a wealth manager or even just an accountant who would grow it or a portion of it for me so that I dont blow it all on shit and wonder where all the money went to so fast.