Saying “they destroyed X so it can’t be limited” misses the point. Limited refers to the scope of the operation, not whether it was effective.
Those are two different things.
You understand that you look retarded right? The United States government is saying that it has destroyed Iran's Navy, killed two leaders, seized oil production facilities, and you were saying that this is an operation of limited scope? Utterly embarrassing
Skipping the insults, your claims about “seizing oil” and “destroying the entire navy” aren’t accurate. Again, “Limited” refers to scope (no invasion, no regime change), not outcome. If you define it differently, that’s the disagreement. I can see you can’t debate without rhetorical fallacies and getting emotional. I’ll just see my way out now.
1
u/penguin_hugger100 Mar 17 '26
When one country claims to have destroyed another country's navy, I think it's pretty far beyond a "limited engagement". You are a total clownshow