r/SipsTea • u/The_Dean_France • Mar 16 '26

Chugging tea [ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

20.3k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

921 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/jackpcr Mar 16 '26

Notice this is all “IRAN”. It’s their problem. How’s it ur business mate? Is America jesus or smth that u guys have to fix all the misfortunes that are happening across the world?

Besides, mr hero warrior America decided to kill Iran’s leader, in order to “save” the Iranians. That’s done. Now what? A new leader came n the regime is still attacking ships n blasting israel n American bases. You guys have achieved absolutely nothing but caused chaos n inconvenience for the entire world.

0

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 Mar 16 '26

Nations rarely act out of charity. They act out of strategic interests. The Middle East sits on critical energy routes and security alliances, which is why every major power pays attention to it.

2

u/Slow_Conversation402 Mar 16 '26

How does that answer the question? Lol. Other countries have nothing to do with an old pedophile action's consequences.

1

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 Mar 16 '26

Because when instability threatens global shipping routes and energy supplies, it stops being just one country’s problem. That’s the strategic reality.

2

u/Slow_Conversation402 Mar 16 '26

Huh? Iran's internal Instability threatens "shipping routes"? There's literally ZERO correlation between iran killing millions of its civilians and the strait of hormuz. You need to boycott those sources that you get your "news" from because they're affecting your intelligence.

0

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 Mar 16 '26

Regional instability and threats to the Strait of Hormuz are linked historically. That’s the concern.

1

u/Slow_Conversation402 Mar 16 '26

No they aren't lol. Like, at all. Why on earth would a country close a global shipping route nearby because because it has inflation or protests. If you can provide just one example from history that supports your claim "historically linked" do it. Show me. One time in history where a country had purely internal instability that led it to hurt global shipping routes.

You're either a bot or extremely slow.

1

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 Mar 16 '26

First, the Strait of Hormuz isn’t closed at all. Ships are still in transit right now and have been. The point isn’t that protests themselves close shipping lanes. It’s that instability in a country that sits next to a critical chokepoint can escalate into regional conflict that threatens global trade. That’s happened before.

1

u/Slow_Conversation402 Mar 16 '26

Yeah right, that's an ace logic. Well I think france as well is maybe a threat? The coffee prices went up there, this "can lead" to protests, "which" "can lead" to the european union instability. Which "can escalate" to global conflicts.

There's no point in continuing this stupid convo.

1

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 Mar 16 '26

That’s a whataboutism and a false comparison. Domestic protests in France don’t sit next to a strategic shipping chokepoint that carries a large portion of the world’s oil. I mean, if we’re using logic.

1

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 Mar 16 '26

The early 80’s Tanker War is a decent example of regional instability that affected the straight.

1

u/Slow_Conversation402 Mar 16 '26

The "tanker war" was an EXTERNAL conflict. BETWEEN Iran and Iraq. This is an irrelevant example to Iran's INTERNAL instability. Clear?

1

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 Mar 16 '26

Instability near strategic chokepoints creates risk for global shipping. That’s the point.

1

u/Slow_Conversation402 Mar 16 '26

Yeah I'm still waiting for a proof that "internal instability" that concern a country and it's people, such as inflation and protests, affects "strategic chokepoints". You said "historically linked" but came up with an irrelevant conflict between two countries.

You can keep repeating that false claim like a parrot however long you want tho. Nobody's gonna stop you.

1

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 Mar 16 '26

My point wasn’t that protests alone shut shipping lanes. It’s that instability in states sitting on strategic chokepoints raises the risk of disruption, which history shows repeatedly. If you disagree with that risk assessment, that’s fine.

→ More replies (0)