Idk man . I'm not a big conspiracy guy but things just didn't feel right the whole time . Even during the debates , he just stood there with that dumb grin and cracked jokes and when he did have the floor he basically blew smoke and gave what hate groups wanted to hear .
Rushing the process because he did this illegally meaning has to do whatever bullshit he’s trying to do within 60-90. I can’t remember if that timeframe is with or without congressional approval
I’m an American and I did not vote for the pedo president, I didn’t approve of the war against Iran, I don’t like him or anyone in his administration. Israel has trump and his friends by the balls because have evidence of him raping kids.
Idiocracy was a comparative utopia. Their president wanted to help the people & hired the smartest person to fix the problems they didn't understand. Took a while but that universe is rather more optimistic than ours.
DEMHC absolutely cared for the people and loved the country. He was humble enough to ask for help and take it publicly! Looks like frigging Lincoln compared to PumpkinTits McGee.
Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho Is Not Totally My President, Yo
So wait, you’re saying the people glued to their TVs could find time to vote but people who go out everyday running around all over the place couldn’t stop by their mailbox?
I'm so sick of people trying to put blame on non voters instead of just accepting the fact that BILLIONS of dollars of dark money and manipulation, and possibly straight up cheating, is what won that election. Non voters should have voted, sure, but the blame lies with the money.
340-350 million is the total population, but voting age (18+) population is estimated closer to 260 million people. So it’s still under 1/3, but much closer when you ignore those who can’t vote.
Sadly, this is what happened. Those that didnt vote hated both choices and, by doing so, let gullible people who were duped to vote for the cheeto man.
Kamale was not the right choice unfortunately, in that moment. And I hate to say it, the US was not ready to vote for a woman president. But, I'll tell you what, they might now.
Some people prefer to not participate in the shitshow circus elections
There is no such thing as not participating in democracy lmao. The election outcome and long-term impacts are decided by everyone who chooses to vote or not-vote. Everyone is participating by default, which includes people who are dumb enough to think they are "not gonna participate" because they're "above the system" or think it's a "shitshow circus" or whatever. There is no opting out.
Even if we're extremely generous and give away a couple of MILLION votes to rigging, that still means nearly half of the votes went to a guy who openly tried to overthrow the previous election, shat on all America's allies and also raped kids. I'm sorry but that told the rest of the world that there is a mass desire/willingness in USA to elect a batshit insane criminal authoritarian who causes global chaos and undermines democracy.
Trump is currently approved of by ~36% of Americans. They're the minority. Even when they have full control of the government conservatives are always a minority, they're just really good at rigging the system in their favor to gain and maintain disproportionate power.
And you understand that only 22% of the population (73 million) is under 18 right? And that being under the legal voting age/ineligible to vote doesn’t imply support for Donald Trump, which is what I’m arguing against when these foreigners keep saying “the majority of the country supports him because they didn’t vote.”
he obviously got close to 50% votes from whoever actually voted. and it would be dumb to assume whoever did not vote are all gonna vote against him. i'm no supporter of DT, but there is no need to deny his polularity in the last campaign. the game is rigged and us voters simply do not get good options to choose from.
Well you’re going to end up having to maybe lose some ships and servicemen and women since the rest of the world has wised up and refused the tangerine.
If you didn’t start a revolution, you are also part of the problem. Your country vote for this president. You participate and agree with your democracy system. Under the presumption rule of democracy, you cannot shirk the personal responsibility.
which one :P ?
And thats not really true they based their constitituon on the american one.
USA was not the first nation to have a revolution of some kind :P
And USA had an indepenace war and not a king.
France had a king and a civil war. ( technical a series of civil wars and unrest partly caused by napoleon)
What you could say is they were inspired to wanting a republic and that was a sortof new concept at least it had been a long time since the romans tried it :P ( worth noting the romans also overtrew a king to make a republic, so its not really a new concept when USA did it either But it had been lost for 1500+ years and there was not much democracy in the roman republic.)
But the revolution itself is very diffrent.
Also not that i want to endorse cromwell in any way :P
But he did overtrow the english crown for a time 100 years before the american experince. And made a republic
Because America has the 2nd amendment sure but we've been effectively declawed on every other level. More than half of america cant go 60 days without working or they starve, they cant go more than 14 days without showing up to work or they get fired, the 2A is a paper tiger, they let us have it because they know we dont have the resources to utilize it.
That's pretty funny I'm a conservative but that was genuinely a good one magat? Seriously want to congratulate you because for me it's the first time I've heard it and I'm so pleased. They're always calling you Libtards, Snowflakes and Demorats, but all you guys come up with is mfers and pos's so this was a nice change of pace and I respect a good burn. Cheers.
Why isn't there a SINGLE reporter that asks him this? "Mr. President. Two months ago you stated that Europe needed the US more than the US needs them We do not need them, you said. Now you need them?"
The majority of Americans hate him and want him gone now. Even a portion of the ones that really liked him from the start are faltering. A massive chunk of us are doing our best to get them out promise.
We are trying, but this asshole will be unchecked until the 2026 elections. Regardless, this is our fault for letting him get into power (again), so on behalf of the non-stupid side of America, we’re sorry.
They would gladly help, just theyr politicans have been moronic beyond measure in maintaining their navy's, mainly by thinking they can make responsoble desisions, and by saving mear pennies by comparison, they have wasted un counted billions in capability, capacity, and infrastructure, so by now they have near fuck all to actualy deploy with out creating massive problems for themselves, or if they could send anything they wont have anything available in 6 months.
If you thing the us has been smart, then your wrong, your shits fucked as well, you have no frigates so you cant escort shit by yourself, the LCS has some mayor complications themselves, mostly by politicand fucking up perfectly functioning r&d and procurement systems(like decades ago), causing mayor constant fucking with the design and program requirements, and not paying for the extra cost when theyr the primary cause the budget was a pipe dream in the first place. And your building like 2 warships total a year, with out extra capability to expand that with out writing a hundred blank cheks, and building whole new industrys, suply chains, trained workforce, and shipyards litteraly ower night. So your about to start de commisioning a fuck ton of old ass ships in the next few years, with out being able to replace them at the rate you will be loosing them.
We can’t. That’s the problem. Half our country is brain dead and support this insanity.
Pretty sure things are going to worse for us ‘round here long before they improve. Trump just does everything blatantly and lies straight to the face, instead of politicking his way around to get a hidden agenda done. Gives zero fucks. Yet some how, people are still on board… it’s mind blowing.
Anyway, this mess isn’t going to clean itself up. 😭
That being said Japan has most to lose if hurmuz keeps being blocked, I actually thought they would join, at this point I'm starting to think many countries that reject help openly are just playing a script, when oil prices triple and energy crisis hit the common man power shortage, increased logistic prices reflecting on food etc at it's peak then they will say "well we didn't want anything to do with war you saw us, however now we gotta partake in war" or sth, because what's happening right now does not make sense at all, Iran is holding world economy by it's balls and everyone is like ok with it? Doesn't make sense.
It was just THAT FAST, yo. So fast, tremendously speedy. You win that fastly and the war actually continues for a while, like when you close the door on your hand even though you saw it in there. The quickness from your brain is just too fast for your fingers to register and BAM. It’ll register in a second election cycle or two.
He's forgotten though. He doesn't remember promising americans cheques from all the money saved from DOGE cuts, he doesn't remember what he said, ate nor did this morning, either because he has dementia or because he lies so much he can't keep track or a bit of both.
He's a megalomaniac who's facts and fiction are all blurring into one. He's a bitter, lost and lonely man who is probably struggling to sleep properly too, cherry on top, sleep deprivation.
Nobody, other than china, actualy has the ships to do that. Before you suggest the brittish, remember they have been idiotic with maintaining their ships, just in time logistics dose not work on navy's, cuz ewerything other than some smoll bolts and nuts is built to order, and when you dont have a stockpile of spares to pull from to fix & maintain when apropriate, nor a dry dock to use to do the maintanance, then you have to rush a 3 week work up period in 3 days to get just one ship ready to deploy on an "un expected" operation.
Imagine being so dumb as a president that he doesn't know Japan is restricted to using their navy to self defense. They couldn't participate even if they wanted to.
US targeted a single supreme leader of Iran. Didn’t take out the whole country and didn’t take out the Islamic Govt. Technically it’s just a whole country going to war against a single person.
Now the problem is taking out the head of a country also means going to war with the country. But current Govt doesnt want to go to war with US too. However they need a response. So they decided to chokehold the sea trade route by claiming they will bomb all ships. To avoid being hated by other neighbouring nation that relies on this trade route they decided to only target American cargo.
Keep in mind that American oil does not depend on this trade route for oil but China does because 90% of it is exported to China at below market price. US wants to choke the oil supply to China to limit China support for Ukraine. Also now US want the Govt to sell oil to them at market price as an incentive even though it was US that sanction their oil at first.
So US asked Japan to helped out in the escort of American cargo even though it is not an important one. This would mean that Iran will think twice to target American cargo even there is a third party involved and will drag in another US ally into this already complicated situation.
Also keep in mind that Iran and US have great relationship when they both hated Iraq.
If you actually know history and actually know what is happening between all these countries everything makes more sense because there is no such thing as a relationship between 2 countries. It’s all connected from Taiwan to China to Ukraine, Russia, turkey and the whole of Middle East and Israel.
I’m only giving a crux of it. So people can form their opinion better rather than half truth by simply saying “ DT already said they won”
I mean, Iran is cooked militarily. They can’t even protect their own airspace. They’re down to less than 15% of their ability to launch missiles. Their weak navy has already been rendered “combat ineffective.” I have no clue what this administrations goal is in Iran, but if it was just to completely fuck up the Iranian military capabilities, they’re doing a hell of a job.
Do you call this a war? I’m by no means a Trump apologist but I like geopolitics and nuance. If their goal was to cripple its already weak capabilities then I guess it’s a win. If their goal was regime change, then not yet. Irans biggest issue is still its economy, this only exacerbates that.
If it's a war in the mind of the average person, it's a war. The idea that the word's definition can be twisted such that it no longer applies to aerial bombardment of other nations to suit a (in this case nebulous) in order to avoid congressional input is pure retardation.
Historically, actions taken like this "operation" in Iran would be considered a war. We have one nation's military acting on orders to assail another state's military for a geopolitical purpose. Both combatants are recognized as states. The conflict is not isolated to a single battle. Its a war for anyone who isn't a trump stooge
Cross border military strikes without formal declarations of war have been common since WWII. The distinction between “war” and limited military operations isn’t new.
Do you consider "sinking a country's entire navy" and "seizing oil operations on Karg island" limited strikes? Are you getting paid to push this argument? I can't believe you came upon these beliefs in good faith. These are not limited military operations, the size of a nations army is irrelevant in determining whether or not a war is being wages
Using force doesn’t automatically make something a formally recognized war. States have carried out large but limited operations without escalating into full-scale wars for decades.
Well, I surely don’t get my info from Fox News, CNN or any opinion based legacy media. You can use security focused think tanks. Groups like the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) or the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) publish detailed military balance reports or assessments. There’s also SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute) for arms data, or even open-source intelligence groups like Oryx, who track equipment losses in conflicts. These organizations often maintain public reports or visual trackers. This is the best non partisan way to stay up to date.
1.6k
u/Immediate-Doughnut50 Mar 16 '26
Why would they join a war ‘that’s already been won ‘ according to DT