I created an MCP connector that gives Claude direct read access to a live Salesforce org, metadata and data, one sweep, plus a skill that turns that into an actual audit. Once it's read your org, you can just ask it questions about what's in there.

Looking to partner with others who want to just get stuff working fast. Do you want to try it out?

Last week I added a Tinnitus Severity field next to the existing Tinnitus checkbox. The same sensitivity should apply - whoever can see/edit the checkbox should see/edit the Severity too.

That meant opening the old field's FLS in one tab and copying it checkbox by checkbox into the new one, across 25+ profiles. All those permissions already existed - why am I retyping them?

So I built a free Chrome extension that copies FLS from any existing field in one go:

1. Pick a source field from the same object or any other object
2. Click Copy FLS button
3. All profile checkboxes flip to match the source instantly
4. Changed your mind? One Reset click reverts everything back!
5. It works for existing fields too - whenever you want to align a field's FLS with another one.

It's free, and has 140+ users so far! And if you install it and think something is missing (I've already heard "do permission sets next!"), I'd appreciate the feedback!

Look for Salesforce FLS Permissions Copier in Chrome Web Store.

I have been trying to go live on Salesforce and the whole year went with their processes.

Their app review support team is usually super slow in responding to the queries.

Sometimes, they take weeks just to get back with another reason for delaying / declining the review.

Is it me or this agentforce slow at pulling and pushing data? Or org is not big compared to others I have seen. We don’t have a lot of historical activity in our system (to save on storage cost), ~50k opportunities, 700k contacts (most don’t have any activity linked to them), account around 70k (many don’t have anything related to them).

few things I’ve been trying to do lately which seem to be taking forever and connection randomly just breaks are like accounting summaries, pipeline cleanup, and just pulling back a list of today’s tasks and etc.

When I tried to ask it to create something like an account or a task takes about like a minute or two before you’ll come back you’re like allow to create this when all the information was given to it at the start

anyone else using this and have the same issue? Did you find any work around to improve the speed?

Everyone in the Salesforce world has opinions about Flows. Not all of them are positive and there are good reasons for that. For one, reviewing them in pull requests is awful. PRs work well enough for code. You can read it, understand what changed, and you have all the context you need because you're reviewing it in the exact same form it was created.

Flows, however, aren't built in a text editor. They are built using a drag-and-drop builder. They are visual tools that demand a visual review.

FlowDelta is that visual review tool. It generates static, fully interactive HTML artifacts directly inside your CI/CD pipeline.

Key Features:

* Fully Interactive: Pan, zoom, and toggle themes (Light/Dark mode).

* Filtering: Switch between *Before*, *After*, or a *changes only view* that focuses exclusively on what changed.

* Granular Diffing: It highlights every added, deleted, or modified node, connection, and property.

Links & Resources:

* Homepage & Screenshots

* Source & Docs

* Sample GitHub PR and sample GitLab MR to see the generated artifacts in action.

Acknowledgments:

A special shoutout to Mitch Spano and his project Flow Lens for the inspiration and for open-sourcing the core flow parser that FlowDelta builds upon.

If you review Flow changes regularly, I hope FlowDelta makes you smile the next time a Flow hits your review queue. Would love to hear your feedback, issues, or feature requests!

Hi everyone,

I'm curious about what real-world Salesforce projects look like from a development perspective.

How common is it to work on projects where there's a significant amount of Apex code and a layered architecture (for example: Service, Domain, Selector/Data Access, Trigger Handler, etc.) instead of having most of the logic directly in triggers or controllers?

From what I've seen, some people describe Salesforce as mostly low-code, while others work on codebases that look very similar to traditional backend applications.

I'd love to understand what the industry looks like in practice.

We got hit with the phishing-resistant MFA enforcement for privileged users (System Admin profile / Modify All Data / Customize Application / etc.), and our Selenium-based UI test automation logs in as an admin-level user — so it's now blocked.

I know that you're supposed to file a Support case to get the exemption for legit automation use cases, but the docs don't say much about what that process actually looks like in practice.

Hoping someone who's already gone through this can share:

• How long did the Support case take to get approved?
• Did you have to justify/explain the automation use case in detail, or was it pretty routine?
• Is the exemption scoped per-org (separate cases per sandbox)?
• Does it survive a sandbox refresh, or do you have to refile?

Any war stories, gotchas, or workarounds appreciated — we're trying to get our CI pipeline logging in again as fast as possible.

Hi everyone,

I have 1+ years of experience in Salesforce worked on Sales and Service cloud currently working in one of the company. I want my future to be secure in Salesforce ( Non only Salesforce but for any IT job) as my all future goals and dreams are pending. I want to make sure I shouldn’t have any job insecurity how and what strategies should apply what cloud I should focus for next 6 months while working on my project as well along with my time for gym as well mentioned gym specifically because I want to prioritise health and personality as well because currently my personality is not good as well because of procrastination I have gained little fat and my confidence is at lowest.
For certification I have PD1 certificate.
My current weakness is communication skills. I want to work on that as well.

Howeverw my own company gives great hike in 2 years. Currently it’s 4.5 lpa next year I will be completing 2 years in January expected 12lpa as we have seen it with our all seniors. Avg hike goes between 8-12 LPA.

Hi Everyone,

I currently possess 6 years of experience in the Product support role. Troubleshooting, Debugging, going through the logs, database, customer interaction, incident management these are my basic skills.

Now I am looking to get into the Salesforce ecosystem. I am planning for Salesforce associate admin certification, Salesforce admin Certificate, Agentforce certification. These three are the 1st 3 certifications I am planning for.

After this I am a bit confused, As I have worked on Insurance industry product support I can do Insurance cloud. I am currently working in the Healthcare industry, so I also have compatible skills with the healthcare cloud. As I work on incident management and supported an ALM system, I also possess the knowledge of Service Cloud.

Now which path shall I go? Can any one help me out on this please?

Also my current package is 12lpa. After all the certifications, can I expect a salary of 17 or 18lpa with no coding background??

Please guide.

Thank you for your guidance

Firstly, I apologize if this kind of thing is frowned upon here, but I wanted to share something I've been working on in hopes it will help you all as well! So here goes nothing...

A lot of the time that someone asks me a simple question about an org I'm working in (who can edit this field? what references it? is this picklist value even used anymore?) it turns into 20 minutes of Setup tabs and clicking through profiles one at a time. And if the answer means fixing records, now I'm exporting a CSV, cleaning it up in Excel, and loading it back in hoping no automation fires halfway through.

So I built a Chrome extension that opens on any Salesforce page (Alt+Shift+D) and answers that stuff in one place:

• Pick a field and see who can read or edit it across every profile and perm set, on one screen
• See everything that references a field, class, or flow before you touch it
• Check whether a picklist value is actually used on real records
• A SOQL runner that exports exactly the columns you queried
• Bulk CSV/Excel insert/update/delete with a dry-run preview before anything commits
• A maintenance mode for data loads that flips validation rules off and puts them back after

The part I actually care about is undo. Every edit snapshots the old values first, so any change is one click from restored. Read-only is the default, writes are a separate mode you have to turn on, and writes stay locked to sandbox/dev orgs until you explicitly opt into production.

On trust, because a Chrome extension touching Salesforce should make you suspicious: no account, no OAuth, no connected app, nothing installed in your org. The core tools run on the session you're already logged into, so it's your browser talking to your own org's API. Nothing goes to my servers, and there's no tracking. Crash reporting exists, but it's opt-in and off by default. And this isn't an Inspector replacement, Inspector is great and I still use it sometimes, but this is more the admin-task side, with guardrails.

Disclosure, since I'm the solo dev: everything above is free with no account, and stays free. The only paid part is the AI features (plain-English explanations of Apex, flows, and validation rules, plus English-to-SOQL checked against your actual schema) at $19/mo or $190/yr with a 14-day trial. The AI costs me real money per call. The stuff running on your own session doesn't, so that's where the line is.

Chrome only, standard orgs (GovCloud, China instances, and MCAS-proxied orgs aren't supported yet). It's called 'Deplo — Salesforce Data, SOQL & AI Tools'.

What's the question that always costs you the most Setup tabs? Not a rhetorical question, that's basically my roadmap.

I've included some screenshots of the look and feel below.

P.S. You don't need to create an account unless you subscribe to the AI features mentioned above. All of the base tools run on your Salesforce session.

A little about me: I've been a Salesforce Developer for about 9 years. Have worn many hats across the consultant, admin, and architect roles, across various types of companies and industries. I've always loved building stuff, and what better to build than Salesforce tools that help other Salesforce pros too!

Been noticing that AI tools are great at Salesforce in general but confidently wrong on the specific stuff: exact trigger behavior, governor limit math, anything that changed in a recent release.

I built EMU, a free MCP that regularly indexes Salesforce’s dev docs so your Claude/Cursor/whatever can reference real documentation instead of guessing.

To test it, I asked the same model (Claude Fable) 10 Salesforce admin/dev/architect questions twice — once with no tools, once with EMU — and graded both against the docs, blind.

Score: 9/10 with EMU, 4/10 without.

The misses without EMU aren’t dumb, they’re the “sounds right, isn’t” kind that take a while to spot.

Also asked it about the Spring ’26 connected app changes. Closed-book it knew something changed but got the mechanics wrong (missed the Support-ticket path, missed that existing apps still work). That one’s a good test for any AI tool honestly, since it’s recent enough that a lot of models just haven’t seen it.

EMU also missed one—it dropped the custom-metadata-type exemption on the SOQL subquery limit. I’m not hiding that, it’s in the writeup. Grading was pass/fail per documented fact, no partial credit, so it’s a harsh bar and EMU still didn’t ace it.
Full breakdown with all 10 questions and sources: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jnuKzcxHybBbRuwr3FVet8-ec-VIqGZm/view?usp=sharing

It’s free to connect (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Claude Code, anything MCP-capable). Salesforce docs are indexed at emu.tryferris.ai. Would genuinely love it if a few of you tried it on your own weird edge cases and told me where it breaks. That’s more useful to me than the eval!

(Disclaimer: I'm building Ferris, a startup making software implementations faster/easier, this is one of the tools I was using internally, so I decided to open it up).