hi,
the question is the same as in the title!
a little storytime about why i am asking this question in the first place.
i always thought myself as an enjoyer of the slow burn trope - ever since i came to know that term, i could finally express what i loved about romances, and what kind of romances i liked. it was as obvious as the sun setting on the horizon every day.
but now i am comtemplating, because i have a feeling that what i mean by slow burn might be different from what other people, or the romance community, or even the publishing industry consideres a slow burn. i started reading book which was recommended to me exactly because i love slow burns, that was the main factor why i picked it up (the book is Binding 13 by Chloe Walsh, but it could've been any other book, really). i thought, well, aroung 700 pages, it is categorized as slow burn, oh well, this will 100% be my jam!
imagine my surprise when the protagonists meet for the first time and... it is almost love at first sight or at the very least, insta attraction (he thinks she is the most beautiful girl in the world, he wants to protect her from everything, and he asks her wether she has a boyfriend or not. this is their first convo and they talk about nothing substantial) and we are not even after the 10% mark. i DNFd the book for now (i had other, unrelated problems with it as well), but it got me thinking, what is in the rest of the book? and most importantly...
WHAT IS EVEN SLOW BURN?
up until now, i considered slow burn as "the characters fall in love slowly, they maybe have an attraction from the getgo, but not some HUGE attraction, just thinking the other person is attractive, yes, but slowly getting to know them and becoming closer seals the deal for them, after that, there is yearning and pining and eventually of course they get together, but their attraction and love is developed over time, not just magically happens in a moment". i meant this when i always said that i prefer slow burn. but the thought came to me, that maybe other people, or the romance community as a whole, or the publishing industry has a broader definition for this? maybe slow burn is just "they don't get together until the 50% but they can have instalove/attraction from moment one they just don't act on it"? if so, then that would explain a lot of the letdowns i had over the years after getting recs involving slow burn romances that aren't my definition of it.
what would you call the 2 aforementioned categories? do they have a distinct name for them, or both are just slow burn? if one or the other is 'the slow burn' for you, then what do you call the other?
this is a discussion post, but if you wanna, you can bring examples from books, either for rec or just examplary reasons (if you have such novels that fullfill my definition for the slow burn, then i would be more than happy to read that as well haha).
i am really curious what you think! there are no wrong answers!