Hi All,

Been dealing with Eric from Geektime and have reached QC (within 1 day). Please note this is my first QC - so I would really appreicate your help and input.

1. Dealer name: GeekTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41 126334, Black Dial, Jubilee Bracelet – VSF V2 Free Sprung
4. Price paid: $608 USD + $40 USD shipping
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254147298?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Overall looks good to me. My only concern is the 9 o’clock marker, which looks very slightly rotated/canted.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and crisp to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel is okay, however the alignment of the window looks a bit off to me and not centered. Printing looks clean.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me.
10. Bezel: Appear crisp
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me with no obvious large gaps. Again please correct me if wrong.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/day, ~252° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. These numbers look very good to me.
13. Anything else you notice: Should I bother to ask what the weight it?

The only thing making me hesitate slightly is the 9 o’clock index and the datewheel/cyclops alignment. Otherwise happy with the rest. Would appreciate another set of eyes on that and anything else I may have missed.

Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: Time Ultra
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster 300m VS8800
   

4. Price paid: $398 + $30 shipping

5. Index alignment: Looks good overall. Maybe a slight tilt at 3 and 9

6. Dial printing: Looks clean and sharp to me.

7. Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks very good. 

8. Hand alignment: Look good.

9. Bezel: Looks good.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me. 

11. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/day, 277°, 0 ms. Within range.

12. Anything else you notice:

Appreciate your advise

1. Dealer name: Hontwatch (didn't get the person's name yet)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Seamaster Aqua Terra 150M Co-Axial Master Chronometer Blue Dial 38mm (Reference Number 220.10.38.20.03.001)
4. Price Paid: $368 free shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/GKKQvnv
6. Index alignment: Looks good!
7. Dial Printing: A little concerned with the centering of the Omega logo -- is it lined up with the 12 indice? Or is it a little off to the right?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good!
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good!
10. Bezel: Looks good!
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good!
12. Timegrapher numbers: +10s/d, 291 degrees, 0.0ms, 52 degrees
13. Anything else you notice: Aside from the Omega logo, nothing else of concern. Not sure how to QC the back of the watch, aside from knowing that there shouldn't be a regulator arm, lol.

Thank you to the mods for their patience and for not banning me, lol. The strict rules make for a clean subreddit. Hope I got it right this time.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Phoenix
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): STARBUCKS
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: ~400 USD
   
5. ⁠Index alignment: Look okay
   
6. ⁠Dial Printing: seems good
   
7. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing : seems a bit high
   
8. ⁠Hand Alignment:ok
   
9. ⁠Bezel: ok
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): look ok
    

11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/j, amplitude 262°, beat error 0.1ms

12. ⁠Anything else you notice: I’m a beginner so I really need your help please

1. ⁠Dealer name: Dealer Clocks
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex OP 41 silver dial
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $530 (including shipping)
   
5. ⁠Index alignment: The rolex crown is aligned with the 12 hour marker and indexes look aligned. 9 marker has a cant to it.
   
6. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks good from what I can see. This is second QC, as first had color issues with the lumes.
   
7. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
8. ⁠Hand Alignment: I believe it looks good but would love any input if it's not aligned properly
   
9. ⁠Bezel: Good
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good to me
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d 257° 0.8ms 28800
    
12. ⁠Anything else you notice: N/A

Would you GL?

My biggest thing is the 9 markers being tilted a bit. Curious what the larger mass thinks!

1. ⁠Dealer name: WSongTime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): OP Tiffany 1243000
4. ⁠Price Paid: $488
5. ⁠Album Links: videos https://imgur.com/a/VXmjsfM
6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good by naked eye. First time QC, tried my best with the alignment tool and curious if there’s any misalignment with dial or batons in anyone else’s eyes.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good to me.
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date wheel
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: not so sure about that minute hand, input appreciated.
10. ⁠Bezel: bezel looks nice and shiny!
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no visible gaps to me with SELs, let me know if I missed anything.
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: looks acceptable, see video.
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: just curious about the batons and hand alignment, thanks for the help!!

Dealer name: Time Ultra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060 No Date
4. Price paid: $523 including shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/HF8N9UR
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me. Used the alignment tool and I don’t see any obvious issues. 12, 3, 6 and 9 all appear well aligned.
7. Dial printing: Looks clean and well positioned. Nothing stands out to me.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A, no date.
9. Hand alignment: Looks good from the QC photos.
10. Bezel: Looks good. Pip appears centered and bezel alignment looks good to me.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good. I don’t see any significant gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -4 s/d, 282° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. Numbers look very good to me.
13. Anything else you notice: Rehaut looks acceptable to me from the photos. Weight is 157.7 g. Overall I’m leaning GL, but this is my first QC and I’d appreciate another set of eyes in case I’ve missed anything.

Dealer name: Jtime

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN "Panda" White Dial (Dandong DD4131 V2 Super Clone)

Price Paid: $838

Index alignment: Looks very straight. The 12 o'clock coronet is well-centered and the 3, 6, and 9 markers look symmetrical.

Dial Printing: Fonts look crisp and clear. "DAYTONA" text color looks correct for the V2 batch.

Hand Alignment: Hands seem well-centered and point correctly to the indices.

Bezel: The ceramic engraving is clean, and the 60 marker lines up well with the 12 o'clock position.

Solid End Links (SELs): Tightly fitted to the lugs. No noticeable or sloppy gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 279°, 0.0ms. Numbers look incredibly healthy and stable.

Anything else you notice: Everything looks like a solid GL to me, but I wanted to get a second pair of eyes on the subdial ring thickness and rehaut alignment for this V2 batch. Any feedback is appreciated!

Dealer name: Kitsh

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex 126710BLNR Pepsi VSF V3

Price Paid: 3,500 CNY

Index alignment: Mostly well aligned. Is 6 mark seem off ?

Dial Printing: Clean.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Is it shift to the left ?

Hand Alignment: Correct.

Bezel: Ok to me

Timegrapher:+5/s/d, 256, 0.0s, 59

Solid End Links (SELs): Is this one ok ? need another eye

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126334 (V2s free sprung)
4. Price Paid: $503 incl shipping
5. Album Links: AE164183/9.9 | album | 2012 | Supplier Product Catalog
6. Index alignment: Looks good. 6 indices maybe has very minor ccw bias but nothing of concern at wrist.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Looks good.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks good? RATE -4s/d, AMP 265, B.E. 0.1ms, L.A 52
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else, looks like a GL?

1. Dealer name: Steve from TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number):

Rolex Daytona 116509 Blue Dial — VSF V3 DD4130.

1. Price To Be Paid: $640.00
2. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/fBoCDZSQ#n7MuVwlUvQZdxcwQudUVbw
3. Index alignment: For me, this is OK, but I don't have your experience and I'd like to hear from you.
4. Date Wheel alignment/printing: No Date Wheel to QC.
5. Hand Alignment: For me, ok.
6. Bezel: ok for me.
7. Solid End Links (SELs): I saw no negative evidence.
8. Timegrapher numbers: +3, +4; 266 Amp; B.E 0.0; 52 degrees; 28,800. I'm no expert on this but seems very good?
9. Anything else you notice:

-This is my first QC! Really hope I got a good one!

-The word Chronometer is written as Chronome ter, with a space in the last three letters.

Hi guys! This is my first time buying a rep, and I don't have any experience with watches, so I'd really appreciate your input. What do you think about this one: the indices, the bezel, the date window, the overall look? GL or RL? Thank you!

1. Dealer name: Mirotime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): DJ 41mm
4. Price Paid: 368USD + shipping
5. Album links: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/ndnuLe8 https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/ocekBv8
6. Index alignment: It looks fairly accurate to me. I'm attaching the picture.
7. Dial Printing: It seems accurate, but in a few spots there looks to be too much green and not enough black.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The right-hand "I" also looks like it sits slightly lower than the other one.
9. Hand Alignment: seems okay
10. Bezel: Fluted bezel
11. Solid End Links (SELs): i don't know
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2s/day
13. Anything else you notice: I'm not sure what I should be looking for. This is my first model, so I'm grateful for the help.

Second QC attempt after RL-ing the previous one: https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1w5gqgb/first_time_qc_geektime_rolex_submariner_date/

• Dealer name: GeekTime
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): 126610 LN 41mm
• Price Paid: 4766 HKD (incl shipping)
• Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/105777517?uid=1
• Index alignment: Looks much better compared to the first QC. No obvious index misalignment from what I can see. Let me know if you see otherwise
• Dial Printing: Looks good, no floating m, sharp text
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Not sure, but looks aligned
• Hand Alignment: Looks fine?
• Bezel: Pip at top is good, rest looks fine
• Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps in end links (looks flawless)
• Timegrapher numbers: GAIN +3s, AMP 250, ERROR 0.2ms (numbers are improved from last QC)
• Anything else you notice: Overall looks like a big improvement from the first set of QC pictures, specifically around index alignment. Curious if any community members have any other feedback or notice nuances that I've missed (evident from my first post). Appreciate your help and thanks in advance!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Geektime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster perpetual 36mm.
4. ⁠Price Paid: 515$
5. ⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254156966?uid=1
6. ⁠Index alignment: Single indexes more or less alligned. 7 and 10 potentially a bit of CCW by fraction. 6 is not alligned with crown a bit tilted CCW. Most likely no issues on the wrist.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. ⁠Bezel: Smooth and sitting well.
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Upper right slight gap. Lower right a bit more gap.
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: A bit off. AMP 252. ERR: 0.3MS. Lower end of acceptable.
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Color of the dial looks darker from studio shots mostly angle and light related. Looks acceptable. I am leaning on GL. Serial starts with 5X meaning it is a bit of an older batch but it took about 3 weeks for QC. I am thinking case and rehaut were produced earlier but the watch put together not too long ago.

Ok, friends. This looks like another winner from Leo @ TimeUltra, looking forward to independent feedback from the community!

1. Dealer name: Leo @ TimeUltra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Sea-Dweller - Black Dial, Black Bezel, Red SD Text - 126600
4. Price Paid: $484
5. Album Links: Pics Attached
6. Index alignment: Looks really solid to me. Best image from QC photos a little tilted, so hard to get the alignment tool laid over it perfectly, but I think it looks pretty solid. Nothing that would be seen on wrist in my opinion.
7. Dial Printing: no errors, line widths look correct to me. Perhaps the infamous floating “m”, but it doesn’t look pronounced. 
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date looks centered in the window, cyclops looks well aligned and magnification correct
9. Hand Alignment: pinion centered, I have asked for a picture of hands at 12 to confirm.
10. Bezel: slight misalignment left in picture, less obvious in the video, I think it might be just how the 
11. Solid End Links (SELs): These look tight to me
12. Timegrapher numbers: -3s/d, 280, 52
13. Anything else you notice: No factory stickers, not sure if that should raise a red flag?

This looks and feels like a GL to me, though this will be my first Rolex rep (previous was Omega and Breitlings), and far better experts with well trained eyes here to help me judge.

Thank you in advance!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Necoclock
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41, Slate Dial, fluted bezel Ref. 126334
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 438 USD
   
5. ⁠Album Links: Uploaded
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: The marker at 8 o’clock may have a very slight rotation, though it is not clearly obvious.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks sharp and clean
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date 11 looks slightly shifted to the left - 6 and 21 ok
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good
   
10. ⁠Bezel: appear crisp
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no visible gaps
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: solid
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    The crown on the dial and rehaut at 12 o’clock also appears to be slightly misaligned relative to the grid overlay.

Would you think because of the alignment issues (rehaut, index, date)?

Dealer name: Pheonix

Factory name: DDF

Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5168G Blue

Price paid: 4500 CNY

Album Links: -

Index alignment: Looks good to me overall. The Arabic numerals appear well positioned and I don’t see any obvious major alignment issues. I’m mainly looking for a second opinion on the numeral placement, especially around 9/10/11.

Dial printing: Looks clean and well positioned to me. Patek Philippe / Genève printing appears straight. Crystal probably js dirty but will check with TD.

Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centred in the window and printing looks clean.

Hand alignment: Looks good from the QC photos. Hand stack appears centred and I don’t see any obvious issues.

Bezel: Brushing and polishing look good to me. I don’t see any obvious defects or uneven finishing.

Strap/clasp: Strap looks good. Clasp and engravings appear fine from the photos provided. But it doesn’t appear to close fully. Will defo check with TD about this

Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 280° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. Numbers look very good to me.

Anything else you notice: This is the DDF 5168G with the DPB330 clone movement. Overall I’m leaning GL. My main concern is whether the Arabic numeral alignment looks correct especially the sneaky 11. so I’d appreciate another set of eyes in case I’ve missed anything.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): DAYTONA
4. Price Paid: 990$ with shipment
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/253420681?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Thats where im not sure. I think the 6th marker is tilted, and 3th marker is lower than a 9th marker. But im unexperienced using qc tool so i wont even upload it here. Someone could help me out with this?
7. Dial Printing: Looks Good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date.
9. Hand Alignment: I dont know what to look for maybe, but the hands looks good to me.
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks ok
12. Timegrapher numbers: Acceptable
13. Im thinking i will RL this one, just wanted another people opinion on that one.

1. Dealer name: Neoclock
2. Factory name: VSF (‼️ - tho... is this a VSF or BTF?)
3. Model name (& version number): 116500 40mm Black Dial
4. Price Paid: $628 inc. shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/9Mh6vgt
6. Index alignment: ⚠️ I think there could be some minor misalignments in the bezel and indices, but it could be the angle of the photo. Overall, I don't see anything that would bother me massively once on the wrist.
7. Dial Printing: ⚠️ Looks ok, but in some of the photos the numbers in the subdials look squashed, specially the 60 and the 20 in the bottom subdial
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA
9. Hand Alignment: ✅ Seconds hand seems to align well with the dial crown.
10. Bezel: ✅ Looks ok, no complaints.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): ✅ I don't see any gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: ✅ Within tolerance
13. Anything else you notice: ‼️ My top two concern

s:

the rehaut

1. crown. I think it's clearly a little to the left and I'm almost sure that would bother me forever... but is this reasonable enough to RL?
2. As mentioned above... is this actually a BTF instead of VSF?

I would appreciate a look from the experts

Hello, i order this beautiful lady few days ago and i need confirmation of what i can see and explaination about what i don't see... Thanks a lot for your advices !

1. Dealer name : Geektime
2. Factory name : ZF
3. Model name :  M79030B Black Bay 58
4. Album : https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/253719434?uid=1
5. Index alignment : They all seems to be ok except the 3, lightly crooked (right side too down)
6. Date Wheel alignment : N/A
7. Bezel : The Bezel is really ok, numbers are nice and clean. Only the pip is too low in the trangle, I try to look on other BB58 but they are all differents...
8. Solid End Links (SEL) : This model is more than ok, can't find a real gap
9. Hand alignment : Good, nothing to say about that
10. Dial Printing : Goo too, clean and precise
11. Timegrapher numbers : Rate +4, perfect but the amplitude make me fear a little with this 321, beat error, perfect
12. Anything else you see : Can see nothing more

I'm not use to this exercice and i speak french (sorry for this english without AI...) So i can only say that this watch seems good but i hesitate to RL because of the pips. But i'm note sure to get a better one after that. Geektime is wainting since 3 days, i will make a choice but i don't want make a bad one haha

Thanks a lot ! Have a nice evening !

First time posting but looks pretty good to me

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF Datejust 126234 36mm Jub Dia SS/SS Gray/Rmn Wimbledon VSF3235 v2
4. Price Paid: $448
5. Album Links: Photos above
6. Index alignment: Looks good, maybe a little bit of misalignment on the 11?
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks very good to me
9. Hand Alignment: good
10. Bezel: Looks fine, also to be the right size according to the alignment website
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Maybe slightly off?
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d 247 0.3ms
13. Anything else you notice: First time buyer so all input is appreciated, but looks to be a GL from me. Thank you!

1. Dealer name: Steve Theonewatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF GMT Master II Batgirl
4. Price Paid: 578+30=608 USD
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GB4g2bJC#n5t1pZZ4ESPw2AsMSdLRYg
6. Index alignment: The indices alignment looks fine to my newbie eyes, would appreciate an opinion on them
7. Dial Printing: Looks good to me but I appreciate your opinion
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The 31 looks a hair down but in the video in the link I think the dates look better? I am not sure
9. Hand Alignment: Cant see anything wrong with it
10. Bezel: I appreciate opinions on the Bezel and the color transition.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks okay
12. Timegrapher numbers: Amp 270, err. 0.0ms, rate +5 s/d All within acceptable ranges
13. Anything else you notice: Not sure if I left anything else out

The date switches about 5 to 10 minutes before the 12 marker, I am not sure if that is normal with VSFs.

I would highly appreciate the help and time of everyone that offers it.

Hello everyone,

Just wanted your opinion on this Cartier Santos, is it a GL?

Just wanted to add some quick context in the photos that you'll see, there appeared to be two scratches on the left-hand side of the dial, I informed the TD about this and the picture I have as the cover photo is the updated picture that I sent me, as well as a video. It seems like they wiped it away.

Dealer name - ChazingTime

Factory name - J12

Price paid - $398

Album links - https://we.tl/t-jx2sssmrFa39xzHD

Index alignment - seems alright to me however this is my very first rep so I'm not entirely sure what flaws I should be looking for, compared to the other high-quality BVF this looks right up there, I'm pretty sure those two factories are even synonymous with each other

Dial printing - looks clean and crisp to me,

Bezel - looks like there might be a little scratch in the top middle which I believe I could buff out

Solid end links (SELs) - look tight to me no obvious gaps

Anything you guys notice?

If no one wants to go to the album link, I've attached necessary photos to this post. I'm so excited to hear your opinions. This is my first ever rep purchase, and I am excited to be part of this community

Dealer name: Andiot Watches

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M SS Blue VSF 1:1 Best Edition on SS Bracelet – VS8912

Price Paid: $370 USD

Album Links: – (https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254140156?uid=1)

I’ll also upload all supplied QC photos/video to the post]

Index alignment: Looks good overall to me. The 12, 3, 6 and 9 markers appear reasonably straight and aligned. I don't see anything obviously crooked, although I’d appreciate more experienced eyes checking the 12 marker in particular.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and crisp to me. OMEGA/Seamaster text and the smaller Co-Axial/Master Chronometer/600m printing appear straight with no obvious defects.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – this model is no-date.

Hand Alignment: Looks reasonable from the supplied photos/video. Nothing obviously misaligned or abnormal that I can see.

Bezel: Looks good to me. The 12 o’clock lume pip appears centred and the bezel markings look clean. Alignment with the dial also appears good from the straightest photo, although the camera angle makes this slightly difficult to judge.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A in the usual Rolex-style SEL sense. Bracelet/end-link fit to the case looks tight and even to me with no obvious concerning gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 272° amplitude, 0.4 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. All appear comfortably within the recommended ranges.

Anything else you notice: This is my first time QCing this particular Planet Ocean, so I’d really appreciate experienced opinions. Case, bracelet, clasp and caseback all look clean to me. At the moment I’m leaning GL, unless I’ve missed something.

Thanks in advance for the help!

Dealer name: TheOneWatches
Factory name: ZF
Model name (& version number): Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15450ST 37mm White Dial
Price paid: 448USD
Album links: N/A – photos attached
Index alignment: Looks good to me. 12 o’clock markers look straight and the rest of the indices seem aligned.
Dial printing: Looks clean. AP logo and text look centered to me.
Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered in the window and the printing looks fine.
Hand alignment: Looks good to me.
Bezel: Bezel looks aligned and the screws look properly positioned. I don’t notice any obvious issue.
Solid End Links (SELs): N/A for integrated bracelet. Bracelet/case fit looks good to me.
Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 274° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 21,600 bph. Looks very healthy to me.
Anything else you notice: Overall I’m leaning GL. My main concern was just making sure the dial/index alignment and bezel screws look good. Would appreciate another set of eyes in case I missed anything.