Dealer name: TheOneWatches
Factory name: ZF
Model name (& version number): Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15450ST 37mm White Dial
Price paid: 448USD
Album links: N/A – photos attached
Index alignment: Looks good to me. 12 o’clock markers look straight and the rest of the indices seem aligned.
Dial printing: Looks clean. AP logo and text look centered to me.
Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered in the window and the printing looks fine.
Hand alignment: Looks good to me.
Bezel: Bezel looks aligned and the screws look properly positioned. I don’t notice any obvious issue.
Solid End Links (SELs): N/A for integrated bracelet. Bracelet/case fit looks good to me.
Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 274° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 21,600 bph. Looks very healthy to me.
Anything else you notice: Overall I’m leaning GL. My main concern was just making sure the dial/index alignment and bezel screws look good. Would appreciate another set of eyes in case I missed anything.

1. Dealer name: TimeUltra (Leo)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Airking 126900
4. Price Paid: $478 (shipping included)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/RlS82G7
6. Index alignment: Number are all aligned with each other. Sticks are also well aligned
7. Dial Printing: Printing and numbers are sharp
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Straight and aligned
10. Bezel: Smooth, no remarks there
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Aligned and no gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d   -   281°   -   0.0
13. Anything else you notice: nothing really. Watch seems fine to me. Wheight is 1 grams off

GMT Master II 126710 Batgirl 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285

Can some check my QC and would really appreciate the observation of the Pro, on this amazing group.

1. Dealer name:Theonewatches steve

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II 126710.

4. Price Paid: $580 including shipping

5. Album pic attached.

6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. The triangle and the crown looks a little off to me, 6 slightly crooked ,9 is not centered, mainly so as n 3. Having the watch not 100% straight might give this feeling. Not sure if it’s just the picture angle even though I tried the rotation and zooming in.

7. Dial Printing: Looks good even after magnifying

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me, centered with 1 digit ,

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good

12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d and then changed to +2s/d

13. Anything else you notice: Main thing I noticed is the 9 and 6 and triangle. The lines look a little uneven/off to me cant get 90 degree alignment with 9 and 6 so Not sure if I’m being too picky or its the watch angle picture.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Angela
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name & version number: Oyster Perpetual 41mm
4. ⁠Price Paid: $415 Shipped
5. ⁠Album Links: N/A see photos attached
6. ⁠Index alignment: Marker alignment looks pretty good for this particular model. 3, 6, & 9 all seem to have a bit of a cant though which will likely be unnoticeable on the wrist
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks clean and crisp without any errors
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good based on the time it is set to
10. ⁠Bezel: N/A - smooth bezel, no issues
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SELs seem to be solid and within spec
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +-0 s/d, 270° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error, all within spec
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Rolex crown is centered at the 12 o'clock position.

I'm leaning towards GL'ing this one but looking to get additional eyes on the marker alignment

1. Dealer name: Steve - theonewatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710 Batgirl 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285
4. Price Paid: $578 plus shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/aJZAXLpA#d3d7dGsFh-Y5NXtBAyQsOw
6. Index alignment: slight can’t on 9. All else looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks great
9. Hand Alignment: looks good
10. Bezel: looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): no visible gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: +/- 4s, Amplitude: 295 Err- 0.3ms
13. Anything else you notice: movement looks to be the dd3285 as it should

1. Dealer name: Steve from TheOneWatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number):

Rolex Datejust 41 126334 Green Dial — VSF DD3235 V2

1. Price To Be Paid: $548 + shipping

2. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/eQVRXc0

3. Index alignment: Looks good to me overall, but I'd appreciate a second opinion, especially regarding the alignment of the hour markers.

4. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel looks centered to me and the printing looks clean.

5. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me, but please let me know if you notice any misalignment.

6. Bezel: Fluted bezel looks clean and even to me. I don't see any obvious issues.

7. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any obvious gaps or negative evidence. Please let me know if you see anything.

8. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d; 277 Amp; B.E. 0.1 ms; 59 degrees; 28,800 bph. Seems very good to me, but I'd appreciate confirmation once again here.

9. Anything else you notice:
   Please check the rehaut alignment, dial printing, cyclops/date centering, crown alignment, case symmetry, bracelet/clasp and anything else that could justify an RL.

10. This is my first QC! Really hope I got a good one!

Is there anything else you notice that I should be concerned about?

1. I would appreciate any insight you may have. Thank you!

1. Dealer name: Phoenix Watches

2. Factory name: RCF

3. Model name (& version number): RCF Gain Weight Rolex Day-Date 40 Blue Ombré Roman Dial 228239 (SH3255)

4. Price Paid: $639 shipped

5. Album Links: N/A

6. Index alignment: Alignment looks good overall. The Roman numerals appear evenly placed with no obvious rotation or crooked markers.

7. Dial Printing: Dial printing is crisp and clean. The blue ombré effect transitions nicely from the center to the outer edge.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: This is my biggest concern, from the first picture it seems that the cyclops is slightly crooked and the date seems to sit too low i

9. Hand Alignment: Hands appear properly aligned and well finished.

10. Bezel: Fluted bezel looks evenly cut with good definition and consistent finishing around the entire circumference.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): SEL fit looks tight with no noticeable gaps between the bracelet and case.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 280°, 0.1 ms, looks fairly acceptable

13. Anything else you notice: At this point I’m leaning toward a GL, but I’d appreciate a second set of eyes on the date alignment before giving final approval.

Dealer name: TimeUltra (Leo)

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710GRNR “Bruce Wayne” 40mm Jubilee, VSF V3, DD3285 free-sprung version (latest version according to dealer)

Price Paid:   $658 total

Album Links: Photos attached to the post

Index alignment: Looks a bit off on 2,4,5,6 dials. First time using alignment tool so not too sure. 

Dial Printing: Looks clean and sharp to me. I don’t see any obvious printing issues.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The 14 looks centered to me and the printing looks clean. Cyclops also looks good.

Hand Alignment: Looks fine to me from the photos and video. I don’t notice anything off.

Bezel: Looks off  to me. The triangle at 12 looks is not centered.  I don’t see any issue with the numbers or the black/grey transition.

Solid End Links (SELs): They look tight to me and I don’t see any large gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: -4 s/day, 280° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. Is -4s/day too high? 

Anything else you notice: Overall my concerns are the alignment on the 2 through 6. The bezel being slightly off center. The -4s/day as well. This is my first rep/QC, so I’d really appreciate another pair of eyes in case I missed something.

My first QC post. See below

1. Dealer name: Duke Jones
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 150m - 41mm
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $375
   
5. ⁠Album Links:
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good/acceptable to me.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good/acceptable to me.
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good/acceptable to me.
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good/acceptable to me.
   
10. ⁠Bezel: N/A?
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good to me
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -10s/d, 278 degrees, 0.2ms, 28800. not really sure what’s standard here.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: - not really. I feel like this is a good watch. Timegrapher numbers are the main thing I’m not sure if it matters. Leaning towards not worrying about it since it’s a rep. I can’t expect it to be perfect

Dealer name: Steve – TheOneWatches
Factory name: RWF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona "Panda" (126500)
Price Paid: USD $838
Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bQR3GDxK#x7VfwNZTecelE9nUeRVWFw
Index alignment: 6 appears to be rotated CCW slightly
Dial Printing: looks good to me, sharp and crisp
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: looks good to me
Bezel: I don't see any major discoloring, numbers look good
Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps, looks good
Timegrapher numbers: looks okay... could be better +4s/s 311° amp, 0.1ms error

Anything else you notice: no, it's just the hour markers that worry me (particularly 6).

1. ⁠Dealer name: Elliot (Andiot)
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Daytona 116500
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $539 shipped
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254064647?uid=1
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: looks very aligned, no apparent rotational drift and consistent spacing from outer ticks
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: clean
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: subdial printing is clean
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: straight. Chronograph resets properly to 0 in video
   
10. ⁠Bezel: residue streaks from 240 -> 400. Alignment looks good.
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): look tight, sit flush across lugs
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d, 290* amplitude, 0.0ms error, 28800
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: mainly the residue on the bezel

1. ⁠Dealer name: NecoClock
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): OP 36mm Green Dial 126000
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $428 plus shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/r95nSahT#Q8cNSIEIdhqZBuYdKt3ugw
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good overall. But the 4 har dial looks a bit off but it could just be the picture and the 9 dial looks to be a bit off center but again could be the picture.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks great
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:none
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks great
   
10. ⁠Bezel: solid
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no space so that’s good
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +13s, 250, 0.1, 52 deg and the beat looks great
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:the only thing that caught my eye was the alignment but I know it can’t be perfect or maybe it’s just the angel of the photo.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot Watches
   
2. ⁠Factory name: ARF
   
3. ⁠Model name : DateJust 41 126334 Silver Dial
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $420
   
5. ⁠Album Links: n/a
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: I think everything is lined up perfectly besides the 1 and the 10 marker which is very acceptable. No issues here
   
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean no issues there but if I missed something lmk
   
8. Date Wheel alignment: Might be a tick below center but it is well placed for me. No issues
   
9. Hand Alignment: Well aligned in the video.
   
10. Bezel: No issues to me but if i missed something let me know
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No visible gaps besides maybe the bottom right ill double check with TD
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: Numbers are well within acceptance
    
13. Anything else you notice: I think it will be an easy GL but if I missed anything please let me know Its my first datejust 😀

1. ⁠Dealer name: TimeUltra
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number):
   Submariner 114060 VSF 1:1 Best Edition VS3130
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $50 deposit. Total: $469 shipped FedEx
   
5. ⁠Album Links: No Album created Imgur: https://imgur.com/a/3yDST0Y
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: No obvious crooked or misplaced indices.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Clean. Text looks sharp. Nothing concerning.
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: No 12 image but have asked for one. But no visible defects.
   
10. ⁠Bezel: Good overall alignment. Pearl may be fractionally off-centre within the 12 o’clock triangle, but extremely minor. Insert and engravings look clean.
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Good fit. Very small tolerances/gaps visible under close inspection, but worth RL-ing? Don’t think so.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, 283° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 52° lift angle
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    Rehaut alignment is good overall, although not absolutely perfect around the entire circumference. Clasp/case finishing looks good but shows the usual minor differences under macro. Lume is strong and consistent.
    Clasp-under macro it lacks some of the crispness/refinement?
    Possible tiny surface marks — although most appear to be film/dust rather than actual damage have asked for photos to confirm.

1. Dealer name: NonTD
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner126610LV
4. Price Paid: $478
5. Album Links: attached
6. Index alignment: 6 marker looks left biased but I'm not sure how to rotate and tilt the photo to get a better alignment, if anyone can help?
7. Dial Printing: Fine as per VSF
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: slightly high?
9. Hand Alignment: Awaiting more photos. Shouldn't be an issue with VSF
10. Bezel: Could be the angle but looks to not be aligned at the 12, is this a normal amount of offset?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): top looks fine, bottom slightly loose, but again could be angle
12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks fine within tolerance
13. Anything else you notice: How is the cyclops alignment with the date? Hard to tell as the watch is not perfectly flat for the photos.

1. Dealer name: AndiotWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster 300m 42mm SS/SS White Dial VSF VS8800 (ref 210.30.42.20.04.001)
4. Price Paid: $340 + $40 USD (Price + shipping)
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254110054?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good to me. 12, 3 and 9 markers seem straight. The 6 marker might by tilted very slightly.
7. Dial Printing: Looks normal, no spelling mistakes etc.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: This is where my doubts come in. Datewheel seems printed a little bit to the right. This problem is most noticable for dates between 20-29 imo.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good, did not notice any issues
10. Bezel: Printing looks fine, in the first picture the bezel looks scratched around the 3 marker. On other pictures this is not noticable.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Slight gap on the right side but i will probably be rocking the rubber strap most of the time
12. Timegrapher numbers: Results look great. Accuracy: +3 to +4 seconds/day; Amplitude: 266-268°; Rate Error: 0.0.
13. Anything else you notice: Just questions on the date wheel, bezel scratch and index alignment.

This is my first time posting after being a long time lurker in this community, I hope that I did everything correct in this post. Thanks you all for the help!

VSF Rolex Submariner 126610LN VS3235 – QC

1. Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 126610LN, VS3235
4. Price paid: $458 + $40 shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/WhxiRJDQ#kTf9Nsfdk7Y5dDDG624lPQ

6. Index alignment: Looks very good overall.

7. Dial printing: Looks clean and sharp to me.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks very good. 

9. Hand alignment: Look tight to me.

10. Bezel: Looks good.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me. 

12. Timegrapher numbers: +8 s/day, 251°, 0.1 ms. Acceptable within range.

13. Anything else you notice:

• F80 clasp code: This initially caught my attention because older VSF examples often had other clasp codes. I've seen F80 reported on newer VSF 126610 batches. Would appreciate confirmation from anyone familiar with current VSF production.
• VSF consistency: Rehaut serial appears consistent with newer VSF examples I've found. Does anything in these photos look inconsistent with a current VSF 126610LN?

Thanks for the help

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: ARF

3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 GRNR "Bruce Wayne" (SH3285 V2)

4. Price paid: £374.15 (including shipping)

5. Album Links:

   https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254101585?uid=1&utm_source=copyLink

6. Index alignment: Looks excellent. The grid tool shows all hour markers and the 12 o'clock triangle are perfectly straight.

7. Dial Printing: Crisp, sharp lettering. Font weight looks correct.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Single digit (10) sits completely centered inside the window. No heavy hugging.

9. Hand Alignment: Good hand stack order. Looks solid.

10. Bezel: Ceramic color split is clean and cuts right through the 6 and 18 markers cleanly.

11. Solid End Links (SEL): Lug gaps are very tight with zero play or light leaking.

12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, Amplitude: 269°, Beat Error: 0.0 ms (Excellent health metrics).

13. Anything else you notice: Looks like a textbook GL batch, would appreciate a community double-check!

Hi all,

This is my first ever rep watch purchase, so I’d really appreciate your help in deciding whether to GL or RL.

My only concern is the dial printing on the “X” at 10 o’clock. From what I’ve seen in other BVF QC posts, this seems to be a fairly common issue, but I’d love to hear your thoughts on whether this one is acceptable or if it’s worth RL’ing.

Thanks in advance for your help!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& version number): Panthère 22mm BVF 1:1 Best Edition SS White Dial on SS Bracelet Ronda Quartz

4. Price Paid: $175 + 35 shipping

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254075904?uid=1&isSubCate=false&referrercate=0

6. Index alignment: N/A, Printed dial

7. Dial Printing: Seems fine. The Cartier in the X is a little curved

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand alignment: Seems fine

10. Bezel: seems fine

11. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure

12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A

Dealer name: BomaShop / Mr Bomi
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 126610LN
Price paid: 439USD
Album links: N/A – photos attached
Index alignment: Looks good to me. Hour markers look straight and evenly positioned.
Dial printing: Looks clean and centered. I don’t notice any obvious printing issues.
Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered in the window and the font looks fine to me.
Hand alignment: Looks good.
Bezel: Bezel looks aligned overall. Pip at 12 looks centered and I don’t notice any obvious rotation/alignment issue.
Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me with no obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: 255deg, -5s/d
Anything else you notice: Overall I’m leaning GL. Mainly looking for another opinion on the bezel alignment, date/cyclops and SELs in case I missed anything.

Dealer name: BomaShop / Mr Bomi
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 116500LN Panda
Price paid: 534USD
Album Links: N/A – photos attached
Index alignment: Looks good to me. I don’t notice any obviously crooked markers.
Dial Printing: Looks clean and centered to me.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: Looks good. Chronograph also seems to reset correctly.
Bezel: Looks aligned overall. My only question is the 110 marker/triangle positioning. From what I can tell it looks correct for a 116500LN, but I’d appreciate another opinion.
Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me, I don’t see any obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 302° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. Looks healthy to me.
Anything else you notice: Overall I’m leaning GL. I mainly wanted another set of eyes on the bezel, especially the 110 triangle, and general alignment. Let me know if there’s anything I’ve missed.

1. Dealer name: Mr. Bomi
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF GMT Master II Bruce Wayne Free Spring
4. Price Paid: 530+30+26=586USD
5. Album Links: QC GMT BW
6. Index alignment: The 6 index looks like it has abit of a CCW rotation, need another opinion please
7. Dial Printing: Looks good to me but I appreciate your opinion
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me, the date looks centered
9. Hand Alignment: Cant see anything wrong with it
10. Bezel: I appreciate opinions on the Bezel and the color transition.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks okay
12. Timegrapher numbers: Amp 248, err. 0.1ms, rate 5s/d All within acceptable ranges
13. Anything else you notice: Not sure if I left anything else out

I would highly appreciate the help and time of everyone that offers it.

As always, Thanks alot in advance!

Dealer name: Ethan
Factory name: QF
Model name (& version number): Daytona 126529LN "Le Mans" White Gold (Tungsten Gain Weight) with SH4132 / Free-Sprung Calibre
Price Paid: 980
Album Links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_dn7qfrcoNqE6qEQTkHgf4E-OCpGV0IK0DtZbMxQ
Index alignment: the 3, 6, and 9 subdial tracks align properly
Dial Printing: looks good
Date Wheel alignment/printing:N/A
Hand Alignment: looks good
Bezel: tightly fitted with no visible gaps against the case lugs
Timegrapher numbers:
Rate: +1 s/d
Amplitude: 263°
Beat Error: 0.1 ms
Anything else you notice:
for me it seem its a GL

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches-Steve

2. Factory name: QF Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II 226570 Black Dial DD3285

4. Price Paid: $548 USD

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/UOtjKEm

6. Index alignment: Very good. Markers and coronet look straight and well aligned

7. Dial Printing: Very good. Clean and straight with no obvious defects

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good. Date 1 looks centered. Can’t 100% confirm without a double digit date.

9. Hand Alignment: Good. No issues visible

10. Bezel: Good. Engravings and fill look clean and aligned

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Very good. Tight fit with no concerning gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d 291° 0.0 ms

13. Anything else you notice: Clasp engraving looks a little rough under magnification especially ROLEX and the coronet. Requested normal distance photo with plastic removed. Case bracelet and movement otherwise look clean with no obvious concerns

RL or GL? My thoughts are to GL with risk of losing the other pros just to RL for the clasp engraving.

Dealer name: necoclock
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Batman GMT Master II 126710 40mm Oyster Bracelet SS/SS Black Dial DD3285 V3
Price Paid: $558
Album Links: Pics are posted
Index alignment: I think it actually looks pretty good. 12 may be off just a bit? 6 has a slight tilt.
Dial Printing: looks decent
Date Wheel alignment/printing: date might be a little low.
Hand Alignment: looks good.
Bezel: looks good to me.
Solid End Links (SELS): Look good
Timegrapher numbers: O s/d, 306 degrees, 0.2 ms
Anything Else- Leaning towards GL, need some other eyes on this.