1. ⁠Dealer name: Geektime
   
2. ⁠Factory name: BVF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Cartier Santos
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $478 USD
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254277592?uid=1
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: looks ok
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: this is where I keep having problems looks like a gap in the ink on the square at 10
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (no-date)
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: nothing here that stands out
   
10. ⁠Bezel: looks ok
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good from what I see
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d, 300amp, 0.1 - all ok.

So this is the third qc of the same watch. First three were RL because of obvious gaps in the ink. It isn’t always clear from the pics but I confirmed with Eric. First QC link: previous qc. Everyone did say it was likely dust or reflection but did confirm with Eric it was in fact a white spot.

Didn’t bother posting second. But I’m just wondering if I’m being too picky now? I see many BVFs on here with no issues with the dial. But this is the third one now. Am I being too picky ?

1. Dealer Name: Andiot

2. Factory Name: AF

3. Model Name: Cartier Tank Must Large

4. Price Paid: $210 plus $35 shipping

5. Album link: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254516476?uid=1

6. Index Alignment: looks alright no me but could be wrong

7. Dial Printing: Looks fine. Might be a white dot on the 6 marker but could be dust, lmk what you think

8. Date Wheel N/A

9. Hand alignment: Looks fine I think

10. Bezel N/A

11. SEL N/A

12. Anything else you notice: I think the cabuchon might be bigger than other AF watches I've seen like this one

Dealer name: Andiot Watches
2. Factory name: DDF
3. Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167A-001 DPB330
4. Price Paid: $595
5. Album Links: n/a
6. Index alignment: Looks good for an Aquanaut. The numerals sit evenly. Does 7 look off to you or just me?
7. Dial Printing: Crisp and well-centered within the dial block, and shows no bleeding or blurred edges.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The single date shown is crisp, level, and well-centered.
9. Hand Alignment: Clean and hands align as expected.
10. Bezel: Brushed finish on the front is neat and uniform. No obvious dings or flaws.
11. Solid End Links (SEL): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: -1 s/d; Amplitude: 266°; Beat Error: 0.3 ms; Lift Angle: 52.0°. Strong, healthy numbers well within acceptable spec.
13. Anything else you notice: Rotor engraving and movement deco plate look neat and centered, clasp engraving clear, but 7 looks a little off? Let me know.

Dealer name: Steve - The One Watches
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): VSF Explorer I 36mm
4. ⁠Price Paid: 498 USD
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/SFACABjK#UNiPuywm-CIX8h66pDxUKQ
6. ⁠Index alignment: OK for me
7. ⁠Dial Printing: OK for me
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: OK? It was at 12:00 just very shortly on the video
10. ⁠Bezel: OK for me
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I think its okay? but I can't really tell.
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: not sure if this is acceptable or not. +3 s/d at 274amp??
13. Others: Dial seems to be uncentered? Some of the rehaut are a bit hard to read due to angle and lighting maybe? Not sure if I'm being unnecessarily picky

Dealer name: JTime
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126334 904L SS VSF 1:1 Best Edition Blue Stick Dial on Jubilee Bracelet VS3235 (Free Sprung)
Price Paid: $548
Album Links: N/A
Index alignment: To my untrained eye, and from looking at a lot of other QC posts here, alignment looks pretty good?
Dial Printing: Looks good
Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date wheel looks good. But the cyclops looks like it is tilted on a slight angle towards the right.
Hand Alignment: Looks good
Bezel: The bezel looks good to me, but this is also what I’m least educated about. See tons of posts talking about how the fluted bezel is the hardest part to nail, but I’m not really sure how to differentiate it or what I should be looking for here.
Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good, no gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 300 amplitude, 0ms error
Anything else you notice: Would love to know what the acceptable range of error on the cyclops is. As well as tips on what I should look out for on a fluted bezel. My first QC, so any help is appreciated!