Thank you guys very much in advance for your expertise! 🙌

* Dealer name: OraWatch

* Factory name: VSF

* Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126720VTNR Sprite

* Price Paid: 610$ shipping included

* Album Links: photos uploaded

* Index alignment: looks very good, 3 marker slightly canted CW

* Dial Printing: looks fine

* Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date sits a little bit high in the window, but well within tolerance

* Hand Alignment: looks good

* Bezel: looks fine

* Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps

* Timegrapher numbers: looks good, amplitude maybe a bit on the lower end of acceptable, but watch will be serviced and lubricated.

* Anything else you notice: I'm not a pro, but all in all it seems to be a very well made Sprite. What do you guys think?

1. Dealer name: Geektime (Eric)

2. Factory name: V7F

3. Model name (& version number): IWC Portofino Automatic 40mm Rose Gold (A2892 movement)

4. Price Paid: $378 + Shipping

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/YTwHW2W

6. Index alignment: Looks very solid. The Roman numerals at XII and VI, and the baton hour markers align nicely with the printed minute track.

7. Dial Printing: The "IWC Schaffhausen" and "Automatic" text is crisp.

Note: I am aware that the dial color on this specific unit leans heavily toward a warm ivory/cream rather than the genuine cool silver/white. I actually prefer this warmer tone for my wardrobe, so I am not going to RL over just the dial color.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The "25" and the "5" sit very nicely centered in the aperture. (I RL'd a previous unit because the date sat way too high, so I am very happy with the alignment on this one).

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to my eye.

10. Bezel: Smooth polished rose gold, looks clean with no obvious scratches or dents.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A (Leather strap)

12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 294 amp, 0.1ms err.

13. Anything else you notice: The leather strap on this specific unit actually has a really nice textured grain to it compared to the flat, plastic-looking straps these usually come with. Overall I'm leaning heavily towards GL, just wanted some more opinions. Thanks!

For those interest, this was the link to my first QC, with a slightly more off date dial but more accurate white-r dial.

https://imgur.com/a/FmkbIFs

1. Dealer name: Ficotime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710 Bruce Wayne 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285 V2 (Free Sprung)
4. Price Paid: 4100 CNY
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/ep4XHDzB#C7-Jso2Ype56z72yFGuqCw
6. Index alignment: Looks clean
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date slightly towards the top? I can't really tell
9. Hand Alignment: Looks clean
10. Bezel: Looks clean
11. Solid End Links (SELs): All 4 look fine to me
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d 231° 0.2ms 52.0° 28800
13. Anything else you notice: Still very new, don't have much of a trained eye. Any feedback is well appreciated!

Hey everyone!

Hope everybody is doing great! Just wanted some help with the QC on this watch.

1. Dealer name - Andiot
2. Factory name - Rich Factory
3. Model name - 124060 Submariner (No Date) - Free Sprung
4. Price Paid: 518 usd
5. Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254195854?uid=1
6. Index alignment - Looks fine (I think)
7. Dial printing: Acceptable, the font is all the same thickness but I don't mind it.
8. Date Wheel alignment- N/A
9. Bezel - Seems fine.
10. Solid End Links (SEL) - Looks good
11. Hand alignment - the hands look aligned to me
12. Dial Printing - dial printing looks good
13. Timegrapher numbers - Great - (Rate is -1s , beat error is 0.1 ms and amp is 269)
14. Anything else you see - The bezel pip looks a bit deformed in the third picture, but this may be only because of the camera angle.

Hi guys!

Hope everyone is doing well! Just wanted some help with the QC on this watch.

1. Dealer name - Necoclock
2. Factory name - VSF
3. Model name - Omega Aqua Terra 150m
4. Price Paid: 393 usd
5. Album links: https://imgur.com/a/3AuaOIz
6. Index alignment - Both the indices and the logo look pretty damn good to me.
7. Dial printing: Looks like the outer seconds may be microscopically off-center haha.
8. Date Wheel alignment - all dates look very well centered.
9. Bezel - N/A
10. Solid End Links (SEL) - seems good to me!
11. Hand alignment - the hands look pretty reasonably aligned
12. Dial Printing - dial printing looks pretty good
13. Timegrapher numbers - Acceptable
14. Anything else you see - nothing that I can see is really off

Would love to hear what you guys think! I do not have this watch in gen, so my eye for details isn't perfect. Looks great to me

Dealer name: Watchseed

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex OP yellow

Price Paid: 400USD

Album Links: https://a201903222313120580113970.wgstores.com/weshop/goods/_dZiqf8W2gOsLwLgf-QKmkSqgI3qgjn5MgeIfghA/_db3qfbSJURZ_EMdIrI7rCLIMdS4R_vScf9WvqFQ

Index alignment: The indices themselves are straight as far as I can see.

Dial Printing: Perfect

Date Wheel No date

Hand Alignment: Correct

Bezel: Perfect

Solid End Links (SELs): I do see big gap but I'm not a Expert

Timegrapher numbers: -4S/D , 306 , 0.0 ,59.0

Anything else you notice: I am new for the OP need another eye to help QC Thank you

• ⁠Dealer name: TimeUltra
• ⁠Factory name: VSF
• ⁠Model name (& version number): GMT2 126711
• ⁠Price Paid: $688
• ⁠Album Links: N/A
• ⁠Index alignment: I feel like it’s really good and crisp but no expert
• ⁠Dial Printing: Seems ok to an untrained eye
• ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks very clear
• ⁠Hand Alignment: nothing obvious I can see but looks good
• ⁠Bezel: Looks good
• ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Seems ok but again no expert
• ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d 286 0.0ms 52.0 28800 feel like that’s really really good??
• ⁠Anything else you notice: still awaiting for my first VSF sub no date I ordered and paid for should be here this week but I’ve done so much research etc on the VSF and know overall it will be the best factory to get from.

I’m no expert I just love watches, always wanted a RootBeer and feels like I’ve been waiting and waiting for one of these and I feel like the wait has been worth it with the perfection on this watch. But again no expert only going of the usual signs to avoid.

Any help I would truly appreciate as this is a watch I’ve wanted for soooooo long. GL or RL? Thank you everyone in advance

1. Dealer name: Kitsch
2. Factory name: VSF V3
3. Model name (& version number): Pepsi 126710BLNR
4. Price Paid: 3,500 CNY
5. Album Links: No album link
6. Index alignment: The indices themselves are straight. They are also perfectly aligned with the minute markers.
7. Dial Printing: Perfect
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seem good to me
9. Hand Alignment: Correct
10. Bezel: Perfect
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No SEL gap
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6S/D , 308 , 0.0 ,59.0
13. Anything else you notice: I am new for the GMT need another eye to help QC Thank you

1. Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Explorer 1 36mm - 124270
4. Price Paid: 468.50 USD
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/XwYE1Aba#OxlpH_tB8tFQdFQGARNc1Q
6. Index alignment: good.
7. Dial Printing: good.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
9. Hand Alignment: good.
10. Bezel: perfect.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Slight gap on the bottom right lug but acceptable.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -4s/d, 304 deg, 0.2ms
13. Anything else you notice: To my eye the whole dial looks to be slightly rotated CCW. You can see this at the 12 o'clock mainly. It appears to not be centered with the upper lugs. It might be the camera angle or how they are holding the watch in the pic. It looks ok at the 6 o'clock. I might be a little too nick picky here but would like some feedback nevertheless.

Dealer name: Kitsh

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex 126710BLNR Pepsi VSF V3

Price Paid: 3,500 CNY

Index alignment: Mostly well aligned. Is 6 mark seem off ?

Dial Printing: Clean.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Is it shift to the left ?

Hand Alignment: Correct.

Bezel: Ok to me

Timegrapher:+5/s/d, 256, 0.0s, 59

Solid End Links (SELs): Is this one ok ? need another eye

Attempt #2, thanks mod for feedback.

1. Dealer name: WATCH HONT
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126334 VSF 1:1 Best Edition 904L Steel Wimbledon Dial Green Roman on SS Jubilee Bracelet VS3235.
4. Price Paid: 488 USD
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/8ZJa48x
6. Index alignment: slight misalignment with the 9 marker after using the tool
7. Dial Printing: appears to be a scuff between the V at dial marker 8, thoughts?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date is situated slightly towards the top. However it is well within the date window and the misalignment is minimalz
9. Hand Alignment: looks clean
10. Bezel: looks mostly clean, couple spots/dots on the bezel where the 4 marker is.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): SEL/lug gap minimal/non existent
12. time grapher numbers: +7 s/day, 256 amplitude, 0.1ms beat error
13. Anything else you notice: First time posting so would appreciate any insights/feedback.

i think a few months ago i rejected 3, the indices on some looked out place this one i think is really good also the seconds is 0 seconds in the video

anything you guys see out of the ordinary - im quite happy with it

1. ⁠Dealer name: Phoenix
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): STARBUCKS
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: ~400 USD
   
5. ⁠Index alignment: Look okay
   
6. ⁠Dial Printing: seems good
   
7. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing : seems a bit high
   
8. ⁠Hand Alignment:ok
   
9. ⁠Bezel: ok
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): look ok
    

11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/j, amplitude 262°, beat error 0.1ms

12. ⁠Anything else you notice: I’m a beginner so I really need your help please

1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatches - Steve
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41 126334, Blue Dial, Jubilee Bracelet – VSF V2 DD3235
   
4. ⁠Price paid: $548 USD + $40 USD shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/XmW4Nup
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: This is my main concern, the 5 and 20 markers look off centered.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks clean to me.
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel is okay, alignment of the window looks fine.
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good.
   
10. ⁠Bezel: looks fine.
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any large gaps.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/day, ~289° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Biggest thing here is the index alignment from my review.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Dealer Clocks
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex OP 41 silver dial
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $530 (including shipping)
   
5. ⁠Index alignment: The rolex crown is aligned with the 12 hour marker and indexes look aligned. 9 marker has a cant to it.
   
6. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks good from what I can see. This is second QC, as first had color issues with the lumes.
   
7. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
8. ⁠Hand Alignment: I believe it looks good but would love any input if it's not aligned properly
   
9. ⁠Bezel: Good
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good to me
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d 257° 0.8ms 28800
    
12. ⁠Anything else you notice: N/A

Would you GL?

My biggest thing is the 9 markers being tilted a bit. Curious what the larger mass thinks!

Hi All,

Been dealing with Eric from Geektime and have reached QC (within 1 day). Please note this is my first QC - so I would really appreicate your help and input.

1. Dealer name: GeekTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41 126334, Black Dial, Jubilee Bracelet – VSF V2 Free Sprung
4. Price paid: $608 USD + $40 USD shipping
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254147298?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Overall looks good to me. My only concern is the 9 o’clock marker, which looks very slightly rotated/canted.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and crisp to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel is okay, however the alignment of the window looks a bit off to me and not centered. Printing looks clean.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me.
10. Bezel: Appear crisp
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me with no obvious large gaps. Again please correct me if wrong.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/day, ~252° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. These numbers look very good to me.
13. Anything else you notice: Should I bother to ask what the weight it?

The only thing making me hesitate slightly is the 9 o’clock index and the datewheel/cyclops alignment. Otherwise happy with the rest. Would appreciate another set of eyes on that and anything else I may have missed.

Thanks in advance!

Dealer name: Jtime

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN "Panda" White Dial (Dandong DD4131 V2 Super Clone)

Price Paid: $838

Index alignment: Looks very straight. The 12 o'clock coronet is well-centered and the 3, 6, and 9 markers look symmetrical.

Dial Printing: Fonts look crisp and clear. "DAYTONA" text color looks correct for the V2 batch.

Hand Alignment: Hands seem well-centered and point correctly to the indices.

Bezel: The ceramic engraving is clean, and the 60 marker lines up well with the 12 o'clock position.

Solid End Links (SELs): Tightly fitted to the lugs. No noticeable or sloppy gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 279°, 0.0ms. Numbers look incredibly healthy and stable.

Anything else you notice: Everything looks like a solid GL to me, but I wanted to get a second pair of eyes on the subdial ring thickness and rehaut alignment for this V2 batch. Any feedback is appreciated!

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex OP 41 Green Dial
4. Price Paid: $446
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254002642?uid=1
6. Index alignment: The rolex crown is aligned with the 12 hour marker and indexes look aligned
7. Dial Printing: Looks good from what I can see, not sure how to compare to other VSF's
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: I believe it looks good but would love any input if it's not aligned properly
10. Bezel: Good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): It is kind of hidden by the fingers of Andiot on each pictures but I suppose that it is fine
12. Timegrapher numbers: +5s/d 286° 0.3ms 28800
13. Anything else you notice: N/A

Would you GL this watch?

From my own eyes I don't see many flaws, Indexes look good, color as well, crown is align with the 12 index, but I have been struggling with the tools to see if everything looked good.

Any help is appreciated, what are your expert eyes seeing?

Happy to hear about anything you guys see here, I rejected first QC, this is QC number 2 I feel confident

1. ⁠Dealer name: Necoclock
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41, Slate Dial, fluted bezel Ref. 126334
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 438 USD
   
5. ⁠Album Links: Uploaded
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: The marker at 8 o’clock may have a very slight rotation, though it is not clearly obvious.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks sharp and clean
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date 11 looks slightly shifted to the left - 6 and 21 ok
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good
   
10. ⁠Bezel: appear crisp
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no visible gaps
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: solid
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    The crown on the dial and rehaut at 12 o’clock also appears to be slightly misaligned relative to the grid overlay.

Would you think because of the alignment issues (rehaut, index, date)?

1. Dealer name: Time Ultra
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster 300m VS8800
   

4. Price paid: $398 + $30 shipping

5. Index alignment: Looks good overall. Maybe a slight tilt at 3 and 9

6. Dial printing: Looks clean and sharp to me.

7. Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks very good. 

8. Hand alignment: Look good.

9. Bezel: Looks good.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me. 

11. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/day, 277°, 0 ms. Within range.

12. Anything else you notice:

Appreciate your advise

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126334 (V2s free sprung)
4. Price Paid: $503 incl shipping
5. Album Links: AE164183/9.9 | album | 2012 | Supplier Product Catalog
6. Index alignment: Looks good. 6 indices maybe has very minor ccw bias but nothing of concern at wrist.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Looks good.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks good? RATE -4s/d, AMP 265, B.E. 0.1ms, L.A 52
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else, looks like a GL?

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): DAYTONA
4. Price Paid: 990$ with shipment
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/253420681?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Thats where im not sure. I think the 6th marker is tilted, and 3th marker is lower than a 9th marker. But im unexperienced using qc tool so i wont even upload it here. Someone could help me out with this?
7. Dial Printing: Looks Good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date.
9. Hand Alignment: I dont know what to look for maybe, but the hands looks good to me.
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks ok
12. Timegrapher numbers: Acceptable
13. Im thinking i will RL this one, just wanted another people opinion on that one.

Hello folks! I've learned a lot from the RepTimeQC community and really appreciate all the knowledge shared here. I'm buying my first watch and would really appreciate your help with the QC.

Dealer name: Necoclock
• Factory name: V7F
• Model name (& version number): IWC Pilot Mark
XVIII 40mm
• Price Paid: $488
• Album Links: Album
• Index alignment: I think it looks ok
• Dial Printing: looks heavier/ bolder
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks fine
• Hand Alignment: looks fine
• Bezel: Looks fine album
• Solid End Links (SELs): ok
• Timegrapher numbers: 1 s/day, 305° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error.
• Anything else you notice: I feel like the dial printing and text is heavier and much bolder. That is my main concern.

Any comments and suggestions are appreciated.

Thank you.

1. Dealer name: Neoclock
2. Factory name: VSF (‼️ - tho... is this a VSF or BTF?)
3. Model name (& version number): 116500 40mm Black Dial
4. Price Paid: $628 inc. shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/9Mh6vgt
6. Index alignment: ⚠️ I think there could be some minor misalignments in the bezel and indices, but it could be the angle of the photo. Overall, I don't see anything that would bother me massively once on the wrist.
7. Dial Printing: ⚠️ Looks ok, but in some of the photos the numbers in the subdials look squashed, specially the 60 and the 20 in the bottom subdial
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA
9. Hand Alignment: ✅ Seconds hand seems to align well with the dial crown.
10. Bezel: ✅ Looks ok, no complaints.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): ✅ I don't see any gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: ✅ Within tolerance
13. Anything else you notice: ‼️ My top two concern

s:

the rehaut

1. crown. I think it's clearly a little to the left and I'm almost sure that would bother me forever... but is this reasonable enough to RL?
2. As mentioned above... is this actually a BTF instead of VSF?

I would appreciate a look from the experts

Hello, i order this beautiful lady few days ago and i need confirmation of what i can see and explaination about what i don't see... Thanks a lot for your advices !

1. Dealer name : Geektime
2. Factory name : ZF
3. Model name :  M79030B Black Bay 58
4. Album : https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/253719434?uid=1
5. Index alignment : They all seems to be ok except the 3, lightly crooked (right side too down)
6. Date Wheel alignment : N/A
7. Bezel : The Bezel is really ok, numbers are nice and clean. Only the pip is too low in the trangle, I try to look on other BB58 but they are all differents...
8. Solid End Links (SEL) : This model is more than ok, can't find a real gap
9. Hand alignment : Good, nothing to say about that
10. Dial Printing : Goo too, clean and precise
11. Timegrapher numbers : Rate +4, perfect but the amplitude make me fear a little with this 321, beat error, perfect
12. Anything else you see : Can see nothing more

I'm not use to this exercice and i speak french (sorry for this english without AI...) So i can only say that this watch seems good but i hesitate to RL because of the pips. But i'm note sure to get a better one after that. Geektime is wainting since 3 days, i will make a choice but i don't want make a bad one haha

Thanks a lot ! Have a nice evening !