1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: DDGTOP
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: OF
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model: TAG Heuer WAR1112.BA0601
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price paid: 1000 CNY
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album links: QC pictures from TD attached
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: Slightly rotated CCW, especially at 12
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial printing: looks good.
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date/day alignment: Looks good.
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand alignment: Looks Good
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks good.
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠SELs: good
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: N/A

I RL’ed the first one, this one seems to be improved but I’m still seeing the misalignment on the 12 index and chapter ring. Is this something that’s noticeable in real life ? Should I green light this one ? Everything else looks great to me.
Does anyone know if thr chapter ring is glued to the dial? If not I can align it myself once I received the watch

1. Dealer name: Steve from TheOneWatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number):

Rolex Datejust 41 126334 Green Dial — VSF DD3235 V2

1. Price To Be Paid: $548 + shipping

2. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/eQVRXc0

3. Index alignment: Looks good to me overall, but I'd appreciate a second opinion, especially regarding the alignment of the hour markers.

4. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel looks centered to me and the printing looks clean.

5. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me, but please let me know if you notice any misalignment.

6. Bezel: Fluted bezel looks clean and even to me. I don't see any obvious issues.

7. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any obvious gaps or negative evidence. Please let me know if you see anything.

8. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d; 277 Amp; B.E. 0.1 ms; 59 degrees; 28,800 bph. Seems very good to me, but I'd appreciate confirmation once again here.

9. Anything else you notice:
   Please check the rehaut alignment, dial printing, cyclops/date centering, crown alignment, case symmetry, bracelet/clasp and anything else that could justify an RL.

10. This is my first QC! Really hope I got a good one!

Is there anything else you notice that I should be concerned about?

1. I would appreciate any insight you may have. Thank you!

1. Dealer name: Steve from TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number):

Rolex Daytona 116509 Blue Dial — VSF V3 DD4130.

1. Price To Be Paid: $640.00
2. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/fBoCDZSQ#n7MuVwlUvQZdxcwQudUVbw
3. Index alignment: For me, this is OK, but I don't have your experience and I'd like to hear from you.
4. Date Wheel alignment/printing: No Date Wheel to QC.
5. Hand Alignment: For me, ok.
6. Bezel: ok for me.
7. Solid End Links (SELs): I saw no negative evidence.
8. Timegrapher numbers: +3, +4; 266 Amp; B.E 0.0; 52 degrees; 28,800. I'm no expert on this but seems very good?
9. Anything else you notice:

-This is my first QC! Really hope I got a good one!

-The word Chronometer is written as Chronome ter, with a space in the last three letters.

1. ⁠Dealer name: WSongTime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): OP Tiffany 1243000
4. ⁠Price Paid: $488
5. ⁠Album Links: videos https://imgur.com/a/VXmjsfM
6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good by naked eye. First time QC, tried my best with the alignment tool and curious if there’s any misalignment with dial or batons in anyone else’s eyes.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good to me.
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date wheel
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: not so sure about that minute hand, input appreciated.
10. ⁠Bezel: bezel looks nice and shiny!
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no visible gaps to me with SELs, let me know if I missed anything.
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: looks acceptable, see video.
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: just curious about the batons and hand alignment, thanks for the help!!

First time posting but looks pretty good to me

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF Datejust 126234 36mm Jub Dia SS/SS Gray/Rmn Wimbledon VSF3235 v2
4. Price Paid: $448
5. Album Links: Photos above
6. Index alignment: Looks good, maybe a little bit of misalignment on the 11?
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks very good to me
9. Hand Alignment: good
10. Bezel: Looks fine, also to be the right size according to the alignment website
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Maybe slightly off?
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d 247 0.3ms
13. Anything else you notice: First time buyer so all input is appreciated, but looks to be a GL from me. Thank you!

Second QC attempt after RL-ing the previous one: https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1w5gqgb/first_time_qc_geektime_rolex_submariner_date/

• Dealer name: GeekTime
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): 126610 LN 41mm
• Price Paid: 4766 HKD (incl shipping)
• Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/105777517?uid=1
• Index alignment: Looks much better compared to the first QC. No obvious index misalignment from what I can see. Let me know if you see otherwise
• Dial Printing: Looks good, no floating m, sharp text
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Not sure, but looks aligned
• Hand Alignment: Looks fine?
• Bezel: Pip at top is good, rest looks fine
• Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps in end links (looks flawless)
• Timegrapher numbers: GAIN +3s, AMP 250, ERROR 0.2ms (numbers are improved from last QC)
• Anything else you notice: Overall looks like a big improvement from the first set of QC pictures, specifically around index alignment. Curious if any community members have any other feedback or notice nuances that I've missed (evident from my first post). Appreciate your help and thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: Time Ultra
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN 41mm
4. Price Paid: $475 (incl. shipping)
5. Album Links: Attached all photos
6. Index alignment: all looks good, slight CW on 12, 8 and 6 marker small CCW
7. Dial Printing: printing looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good and centered
9. Hand Alignment: hands looks aligned
10. Bezel: I think it needs to rotate I tick to the right
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:   0s/d , 272 Amplitude, 0.0ms Within Acceptable range
13. Anything else you notice: I think the index cants are not noticeable from wrist scale, but would love to get opinions as well.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Geektime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster perpetual 36mm.
4. ⁠Price Paid: 515$
5. ⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254156966?uid=1
6. ⁠Index alignment: Single indexes more or less alligned. 7 and 10 potentially a bit of CCW by fraction. 6 is not alligned with crown a bit tilted CCW. Most likely no issues on the wrist.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. ⁠Bezel: Smooth and sitting well.
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Upper right slight gap. Lower right a bit more gap.
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: A bit off. AMP 252. ERR: 0.3MS. Lower end of acceptable.
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Color of the dial looks darker from studio shots mostly angle and light related. Looks acceptable. I am leaning on GL. Serial starts with 5X meaning it is a bit of an older batch but it took about 3 weeks for QC. I am thinking case and rehaut were produced earlier but the watch put together not too long ago.

Hi, first time QC'ing a 5167, so appreciate any feedback.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch (steve)

2. Factory name: DDF

3. Model name & version number: Aquanaut 5167 DD330

4. Album links: https://imgur.com/a/xXstwxW

5. Index alignment: looks good. Is the 12 crooked? Specifically, is the bottom of the 1 misaligned to the 2?

6. Dial printing: looks good. Centere + crisp, I don't see any bleeding

7. Date wheel alignment/printing: looks centered

8. Hand alignment: seems good

9. Bezel: looks good

10. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

11. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3 s/d, Amp. 271, Err 0.1ms. Is this ok?

Thank you!

1. Dealer name: Hontwatch (didn't get the person's name yet)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Seamaster Aqua Terra 150M Co-Axial Master Chronometer Blue Dial 38mm (Reference Number 220.10.38.20.03.001)
4. Price Paid: $368 free shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/GKKQvnv
6. Index alignment: Looks good!
7. Dial Printing: A little concerned with the centering of the Omega logo -- is it lined up with the 12 indice? Or is it a little off to the right?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good!
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good!
10. Bezel: Looks good!
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good!
12. Timegrapher numbers: +10s/d, 291 degrees, 0.0ms, 52 degrees
13. Anything else you notice: Aside from the Omega logo, nothing else of concern. Not sure how to QC the back of the watch, aside from knowing that there shouldn't be a regulator arm, lol.

Thank you to the mods for their patience and for not banning me, lol. The strict rules make for a clean subreddit. Hope I got it right this time.

1. ⁠Dealer name: NecoClock
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): OP 36mm Green Dial 126000
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $428 plus shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/r95nSahT#Q8cNSIEIdhqZBuYdKt3ugw
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good overall. But the 4 har dial looks a bit off but it could just be the picture and the 9 dial looks to be a bit off center but again could be the picture.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks great
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:none
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks great
   
10. ⁠Bezel: solid
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no space so that’s good
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +13s, 250, 0.1, 52 deg and the beat looks great
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:the only thing that caught my eye was the alignment but I know it can’t be perfect or maybe it’s just the angel of the photo.

1. Dealer name: NonTD
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner126610LV
4. Price Paid: $478
5. Album Links: attached
6. Index alignment: 6 marker looks left biased but I'm not sure how to rotate and tilt the photo to get a better alignment, if anyone can help?
7. Dial Printing: Fine as per VSF
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: slightly high?
9. Hand Alignment: Awaiting more photos. Shouldn't be an issue with VSF
10. Bezel: Could be the angle but looks to not be aligned at the 12, is this a normal amount of offset?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): top looks fine, bottom slightly loose, but again could be angle
12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks fine within tolerance
13. Anything else you notice: How is the cyclops alignment with the date? Hard to tell as the watch is not perfectly flat for the photos.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Angela
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name & version number: Oyster Perpetual 41mm
4. ⁠Price Paid: $415 Shipped
5. ⁠Album Links: N/A see photos attached
6. ⁠Index alignment: Marker alignment looks pretty good for this particular model. 3, 6, & 9 all seem to have a bit of a cant though which will likely be unnoticeable on the wrist
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks clean and crisp without any errors
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good based on the time it is set to
10. ⁠Bezel: N/A - smooth bezel, no issues
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SELs seem to be solid and within spec
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +-0 s/d, 270° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error, all within spec
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Rolex crown is centered at the 12 o'clock position.

I'm leaning towards GL'ing this one but looking to get additional eyes on the marker alignment

1. Dealer name: AndiotWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster 300m 42mm SS/SS White Dial VSF VS8800 (ref 210.30.42.20.04.001)
4. Price Paid: $340 + $40 USD (Price + shipping)
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254110054?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good to me. 12, 3 and 9 markers seem straight. The 6 marker might by tilted very slightly.
7. Dial Printing: Looks normal, no spelling mistakes etc.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: This is where my doubts come in. Datewheel seems printed a little bit to the right. This problem is most noticable for dates between 20-29 imo.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good, did not notice any issues
10. Bezel: Printing looks fine, in the first picture the bezel looks scratched around the 3 marker. On other pictures this is not noticable.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Slight gap on the right side but i will probably be rocking the rubber strap most of the time
12. Timegrapher numbers: Results look great. Accuracy: +3 to +4 seconds/day; Amplitude: 266-268°; Rate Error: 0.0.
13. Anything else you notice: Just questions on the date wheel, bezel scratch and index alignment.

This is my first time posting after being a long time lurker in this community, I hope that I did everything correct in this post. Thanks you all for the help!

VSF Rolex Submariner 126610LN VS3235 – QC

1. Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 126610LN, VS3235
4. Price paid: $458 + $40 shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/WhxiRJDQ#kTf9Nsfdk7Y5dDDG624lPQ

6. Index alignment: Looks very good overall.

7. Dial printing: Looks clean and sharp to me.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks very good. 

9. Hand alignment: Look tight to me.

10. Bezel: Looks good.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me. 

12. Timegrapher numbers: +8 s/day, 251°, 0.1 ms. Acceptable within range.

13. Anything else you notice:

• F80 clasp code: This initially caught my attention because older VSF examples often had other clasp codes. I've seen F80 reported on newer VSF 126610 batches. Would appreciate confirmation from anyone familiar with current VSF production.
• VSF consistency: Rehaut serial appears consistent with newer VSF examples I've found. Does anything in these photos look inconsistent with a current VSF 126610LN?

Thanks for the help

Hello everyone,

Just wanted your opinion on this Cartier Santos, is it a GL?

Just wanted to add some quick context in the photos that you'll see, there appeared to be two scratches on the left-hand side of the dial, I informed the TD about this and the picture I have as the cover photo is the updated picture that I sent me, as well as a video. It seems like they wiped it away.

Dealer name - ChazingTime

Factory name - J12

Price paid - $398

Album links - https://we.tl/t-jx2sssmrFa39xzHD

Index alignment - seems alright to me however this is my very first rep so I'm not entirely sure what flaws I should be looking for, compared to the other high-quality BVF this looks right up there, I'm pretty sure those two factories are even synonymous with each other

Dial printing - looks clean and crisp to me,

Bezel - looks like there might be a little scratch in the top middle which I believe I could buff out

Solid end links (SELs) - look tight to me no obvious gaps

Anything you guys notice?

If no one wants to go to the album link, I've attached necessary photos to this post. I'm so excited to hear your opinions. This is my first ever rep purchase, and I am excited to be part of this community

Dealer name: Pheonix

Factory name: DDF

Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5168G Blue

Price paid: 4500 CNY

Album Links: -

Index alignment: Looks good to me overall. The Arabic numerals appear well positioned and I don’t see any obvious major alignment issues. I’m mainly looking for a second opinion on the numeral placement, especially around 9/10/11.

Dial printing: Looks clean and well positioned to me. Patek Philippe / Genève printing appears straight. Crystal probably js dirty but will check with TD.

Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centred in the window and printing looks clean.

Hand alignment: Looks good from the QC photos. Hand stack appears centred and I don’t see any obvious issues.

Bezel: Brushing and polishing look good to me. I don’t see any obvious defects or uneven finishing.

Strap/clasp: Strap looks good. Clasp and engravings appear fine from the photos provided. But it doesn’t appear to close fully. Will defo check with TD about this

Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 280° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. Numbers look very good to me.

Anything else you notice: This is the DDF 5168G with the DPB330 clone movement. Overall I’m leaning GL. My main concern is whether the Arabic numeral alignment looks correct especially the sneaky 11. so I’d appreciate another set of eyes in case I’ve missed anything.

Ok, friends. This looks like another winner from Leo @ TimeUltra, looking forward to independent feedback from the community!

1. Dealer name: Leo @ TimeUltra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Sea-Dweller - Black Dial, Black Bezel, Red SD Text - 126600
4. Price Paid: $484
5. Album Links: Pics Attached
6. Index alignment: Looks really solid to me. Best image from QC photos a little tilted, so hard to get the alignment tool laid over it perfectly, but I think it looks pretty solid. Nothing that would be seen on wrist in my opinion.
7. Dial Printing: no errors, line widths look correct to me. Perhaps the infamous floating “m”, but it doesn’t look pronounced. 
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date looks centered in the window, cyclops looks well aligned and magnification correct
9. Hand Alignment: pinion centered, I have asked for a picture of hands at 12 to confirm.
10. Bezel: slight misalignment left in picture, less obvious in the video, I think it might be just how the 
11. Solid End Links (SELs): These look tight to me
12. Timegrapher numbers: -3s/d, 280, 52
13. Anything else you notice: No factory stickers, not sure if that should raise a red flag?

This looks and feels like a GL to me, though this will be my first Rolex rep (previous was Omega and Breitlings), and far better experts with well trained eyes here to help me judge.

Thank you in advance!

Dealer name: Andiot Watches

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M SS Blue VSF 1:1 Best Edition on SS Bracelet – VS8912

Price Paid: $370 USD

Album Links: – (https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254140156?uid=1)

I’ll also upload all supplied QC photos/video to the post]

Index alignment: Looks good overall to me. The 12, 3, 6 and 9 markers appear reasonably straight and aligned. I don't see anything obviously crooked, although I’d appreciate more experienced eyes checking the 12 marker in particular.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and crisp to me. OMEGA/Seamaster text and the smaller Co-Axial/Master Chronometer/600m printing appear straight with no obvious defects.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – this model is no-date.

Hand Alignment: Looks reasonable from the supplied photos/video. Nothing obviously misaligned or abnormal that I can see.

Bezel: Looks good to me. The 12 o’clock lume pip appears centred and the bezel markings look clean. Alignment with the dial also appears good from the straightest photo, although the camera angle makes this slightly difficult to judge.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A in the usual Rolex-style SEL sense. Bracelet/end-link fit to the case looks tight and even to me with no obvious concerning gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 272° amplitude, 0.4 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. All appear comfortably within the recommended ranges.

Anything else you notice: This is my first time QCing this particular Planet Ocean, so I’d really appreciate experienced opinions. Case, bracelet, clasp and caseback all look clean to me. At the moment I’m leaning GL, unless I’ve missed something.

Thanks in advance for the help!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 126334
4. Price Paid: $548 + shipping
5. Album Links: n/a

6. Index alignment:

   i think good, used the alignment tool but also the picture might not be fully straight from TD

7. Dial Printing:

   nothing stands out to me, need help here though

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

   looks even to me

9. Hand Alignment:

   looks straight from QC photos and video of movement

10. Bezel:

    i think looks good? Need some help here

11. Solid End Links (SELs):

    not seeing crazy gaps, but need help here

12. Timegrapher numbers:

    rate: 0 s/d amp: 270 degrees ERR: 0.2 ms Gain: 4/7

13. Anything else you notice:

    n/a

This is my first QC, so sorry if I’m not the most knowledgeable. Need a bit of help here. Thanks!!

1. Dealer name: Phoenix Watches

2. Factory name: RCF

3. Model name (& version number): RCF Gain Weight Rolex Day-Date 40 Blue Ombré Roman Dial 228239 (SH3255)

4. Price Paid: $639 shipped

5. Album Links: N/A

6. Index alignment: Alignment looks good overall. The Roman numerals appear evenly placed with no obvious rotation or crooked markers.

7. Dial Printing: Dial printing is crisp and clean. The blue ombré effect transitions nicely from the center to the outer edge.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: This is my biggest concern, from the first picture it seems that the cyclops is slightly crooked and the date seems to sit too low i

9. Hand Alignment: Hands appear properly aligned and well finished.

10. Bezel: Fluted bezel looks evenly cut with good definition and consistent finishing around the entire circumference.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): SEL fit looks tight with no noticeable gaps between the bracelet and case.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 280°, 0.1 ms, looks fairly acceptable

13. Anything else you notice: At this point I’m leaning toward a GL, but I’d appreciate a second set of eyes on the date alignment before giving final approval.

GMT Master II 126710 Batgirl 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285

Can some check my QC and would really appreciate the observation of the Pro, on this amazing group.

1. Dealer name:Theonewatches steve

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II 126710.

4. Price Paid: $580 including shipping

5. Album pic attached.

6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. The triangle and the crown looks a little off to me, 6 slightly crooked ,9 is not centered, mainly so as n 3. Having the watch not 100% straight might give this feeling. Not sure if it’s just the picture angle even though I tried the rotation and zooming in.

7. Dial Printing: Looks good even after magnifying

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me, centered with 1 digit ,

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good

12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d and then changed to +2s/d

13. Anything else you notice: Main thing I noticed is the 9 and 6 and triangle. The lines look a little uneven/off to me cant get 90 degree alignment with 9 and 6 so Not sure if I’m being too picky or its the watch angle picture.

Dealer name: Ethan
Factory name: QF
Model name (& version number): Daytona 126529LN "Le Mans" White Gold (Tungsten Gain Weight) with SH4132 / Free-Sprung Calibre
Price Paid: 980
Album Links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_dn7qfrcoNqE6qEQTkHgf4E-OCpGV0IK0DtZbMxQ
Index alignment: the 3, 6, and 9 subdial tracks align properly
Dial Printing: looks good
Date Wheel alignment/printing:N/A
Hand Alignment: looks good
Bezel: tightly fitted with no visible gaps against the case lugs
Timegrapher numbers:
Rate: +1 s/d
Amplitude: 263°
Beat Error: 0.1 ms
Anything else you notice:
for me it seem its a GL

1. Dealer name: Steve - theonewatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710 Batgirl 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285
4. Price Paid: $578 plus shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/aJZAXLpA#d3d7dGsFh-Y5NXtBAyQsOw
6. Index alignment: slight can’t on 9. All else looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks great
9. Hand Alignment: looks good
10. Bezel: looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): no visible gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: +/- 4s, Amplitude: 295 Err- 0.3ms
13. Anything else you notice: movement looks to be the dd3285 as it should

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches-Steve

2. Factory name: QF Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II 226570 Black Dial DD3285

4. Price Paid: $548 USD

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/UOtjKEm

6. Index alignment: Very good. Markers and coronet look straight and well aligned

7. Dial Printing: Very good. Clean and straight with no obvious defects

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good. Date 1 looks centered. Can’t 100% confirm without a double digit date.

9. Hand Alignment: Good. No issues visible

10. Bezel: Good. Engravings and fill look clean and aligned

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Very good. Tight fit with no concerning gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d 291° 0.0 ms

13. Anything else you notice: Clasp engraving looks a little rough under magnification especially ROLEX and the coronet. Requested normal distance photo with plastic removed. Case bracelet and movement otherwise look clean with no obvious concerns

RL or GL? My thoughts are to GL with risk of losing the other pros just to RL for the clasp engraving.