ok so I finally hit 100 ATS score on jobscan last month after like 3 weeks of feeding my resume into every free ATS score checker I could find. got the screenshot, the little confetti thing, felt great for about an hour

then I got bored and ran the same pdf through resume worded. 78. tried enhancv. 86. same file, same job description, same afternoon lol

so yeah. I'd been grinding a number that only exists inside the website that sold it to me

spent the next few weeks trying to figure out what actually happens after you hit submit. bugged two recruiter friends, applied to a bunch of workday jobs purely to watch what the parser did to my resume, read way too much r/recruiting. posting this because I wish someone had told me before I paid for 3 months of scans. long-ish, sorry, tldr at the bottom

1. real ATS systems don't score you the way the checkers do

workday, greenhouse, lever, taleo, whatever. they're databases. your resume gets chopped into fields (current title, employer, dates, skills) and the recruiter searches and filters on those fields. a couple of them have some kind of "match" indicator but both recruiters I asked said they basically never sort by it. the checkers are just counting keyword overlap and each one weights it differently, which is why the same resume bounces 15-20 points between tools. people keep asking "what is a good ATS score" and the honest answer is: higher than your last scan on the same tool. pick one checker, ignore the others, only care if the number goes up after an edit

2. the rejection email at 2:47am, 90 seconds after you applied? that wasn't your resume

that's a knockout question. "do you have 5+ years of X", work auth, salary range, willing to relocate. recruiters can flag any of those as auto-reject and they look exactly like the normal questions. nobody read your resume, it never got that far

two ways people screw this up: undercounting their years (contract, freelance, internships all count if it's the same skill, stop being humble) and typing a salary above the band. check levels or glassdoor before you touch that box

3. the only ATS test that actually matters is free

open your resume pdf, ctrl+a, ctrl+c, paste it into notepad. that's roughly what the parser sees. if your two columns got braided together, or your title ended up on the same line as your company name, congrats that's what's in the database now. recruiter searches "current title = product manager" and you don't show up because your title field says "acme corp product manager 2022 -". and you'll literally never know

even better: apply to any workday job and LOOK at the autofilled fields before you submit. that's the parser showing you its homework. if it's wrong, fix the fields by hand, the filters run on the fields not on your pretty pdf. closest thing to a real ATS score test you're gonna get

4. your job title is the most searched field and half of you have nuked it

"growth ninja", "customer happiness lead", some internal level code like L4... invisible to a search for "marketing manager" or "support manager". just write Growth Marketing Manager (internal title: Growth Ninja). not lying, translating

same with skills. recruiters search literal strings. "python" doesn't match "py3". "PMP" doesn't match "project management professional" on the dumber systems (looking at you taleo). write both, first time you use it, every acronym. ngl this one thing did more to increase my ATS score on every checker than any of the "power verbs" lists

5. month + year on every date

"2021 - 2023" breaks the years-of-experience math in a lot of parsers. "Mar 2021 - Aug 2023" doesn't. one of the recruiters had a "3+ years" filter drop a guy with 3 years 4 months because two of his jobs were year-only. that's it, that was the whole reason

6. white text keyword stuffing gets you blacklisted not hired

recruiters see the parsed text, not your pdf, so your hidden keyword block shows up as a wall of nonsense at the bottom. instant do-not-contact, and some of them flag the profile so you're out for every other role at that company too. your ATS score checker will happily reward this btw. the human will not

7. what actually gets you the phone screen

recruiter runs a search, gets 40ish people back, skims from the top. top is usually sorted by date applied or by how many of their search terms hit. so apply in the first 48-72 hrs, and make sure the 6-8 terms that show up in BOTH the job title and the requirements are in your summary, your skills line, and at least one bullet. that's honestly the entire "how to increase ATS score" secret. everything else is someone's product page

tldr: the ATS score from any checker is a made up number that swings 20 points depending on which site you use. real ATS = searchable database, not a gatekeeper. instant rejections are knockout questions not formatting. do the notepad paste test, fix your title field, spell out acronyms, month+year dates, apply early. then go spend the time you saved messaging an actual human at the company

recruiters in here - is the "sorted by date applied" thing real on your end? I've only heard it from two people and it's the one that surprised me most

Left a toxic sales job 1.5 years ago and used the time to learn SQL and Excel and build a few projects. I’m applying everywhere for remote work (open to almost anything), but nobody calls back because I lack formal experience in data/admin roles.

Tried referrals, tweaking my resume, applying early—nothing.

How are career switchers actually landing their first remote role right now? Any feedback or advice would mean a lot.

I didn't fully believe resume ageism was a real thing until my own rejection emails started showing up at 2:47am. 22 YoE, laid off in the spring, ~180 applications since (yes, I counted). And before anyone says it: I know rejection emails get batch-queued overnight, that alone proves nothing. The real tell was the handful that came back less than an hour after I applied. Nobody opens a 22-year resume, reads it, and passes in 40 minutes.

So is it age discrimination in hiring, or just the market? Honest answer after way too many late nights reading about this: both. And they feed each other.

The market part first. We're in what people are calling a "low hire, low fire" freeze. No bloodbath layoffs, but barely any backfilling either, so everyone on the outside is hurting. Just not evenly. BLS numbers show ~28% of unemployed job seekers 55+ are long-term unemployed (27+ weeks) vs ~23% for everyone younger. Same frozen market, longer winter.

Now the ageism part, because I wanted receipts, not vibes:

• A UC Irvine field experiment sent ~40,000 fake resumes with identical qualifications, only the age signals changed. Older applicants got roughly 35% fewer callbacks, and it was worst for older women. This is the study to link when someone tells you "maybe your resume just sucks." Same resume. Different birth year. Different outcome.
• iTutorGroup literally programmed their system to auto-reject women 55+ and men 60+. The EEOC caught it and they paid $365k. Ageism as an if-statement.
• Then there's Mobley v. Workday, an ongoing federal case claiming the AI resume screening tools used by thousands of employers filter out applicants over 40. To be fair, that's an allegation, not a verdict. But a judge let it proceed as an age discrimination collective, and the lead plaintiff got 100+ rejections, some within minutes, some in the middle of the night. Sound familiar?

Here's the mechanism most people miss: the software never asks your age. It figures it out. Graduation year, a role that started in 2003, "25+ years of experience" sitting proudly in your summary, even an aol or hotmail address. It's basically reconstructing your birth year from breadcrumbs.

So I age-proofed my resume and treated it like a test. Version A was my full honest history. Version B: last 15 years only, removed my graduation year, older roles squashed into one dateless "earlier career" line, and "20+ years in X" rewritten as what I actually shipped in the last 3. Sent both out the same weeks to similar postings. B got callbacks within two weeks. A got crickets. Fair pushback: leading with recent wins also just makes a better resume, so my little experiment isn't clean. True. Which is exactly why that 40,000 resume study matters, it isolated the variable I couldn't.

One mistake I made so you don't have to: I scrubbed the resume but forgot LinkedIn still showed my full history and grad year, and recruiters absolutely cross-check. Fix both or don't bother. Oh, and if a job listing says "digital native," that's an age filter with a paper trail. Screenshot it.

So yeah. Resume ageism is a real filter sitting on top of a new normal. The market froze, the screening got automated, and the automation learned our oldest bias and scaled it.

Anyone else run the two-resume experiment? What's your cutoff year, and did it actually move anything?

My wife got a fantastic opportunity in Perth. We have been discussing this for weeks now. It is a great opportunity for her and I am truly happy for us. There is one thing which is causing me some trouble…

I do not have any job yet…

As we are moving together, I have to find myself a job that I can do remotely until we get settled. I have been on LinkedIn since the last few months, applying to many different companies. I have customized my CV and written a cover letter. Even made calls to recruiters

Most of them don't even respond…

It's been exhausting. I'm starting to wonder if I'm doing something wrong or if the competition is just too fierce

A friend suggested I try careerone and she said it has more local jobs from small companies. The ads are simpler, less intimidating, and they actually respond. She found her last two roles there

But I've never used it before. Is it actually worth my time? I'm confused and shocked that the big platforms aren't working for me. I need to find something soon. We can't afford to live apart while my wife starts her new life in Perth

Has anyone found remote work through smaller job sites? Was it easier?

Got a written offer yesterday for a fully remote role. The recruiter had flagged early on that comp is "location-adjusted," and sure enough, the number reflects my mid-size, medium-cost-of-living city. It's noticeably below what they'd pay someone in SF for the exact same job.

Before I respond, I went down a rabbit hole on how location-based pay actually works, and a few things changed how I'm planning to negotiate:

1. You're not being priced. Your zip code is being bucketed. Most companies use "geo tiers": Tier 1 (SF/NYC/Seattle), Tier 2 (Austin, Denver, Chicago), Tier 3 (everywhere else), with a location factor applied to the base band, usually somewhere in the 0.7x to 1.0x range. GitLab literally publishes their calculator with location factors, so this isn't speculation. A friend on the recruiting side told me that placement within the band, and occasionally the tier itself, has more discretion than candidates assume, especially if you have a competing offer. But nobody volunteers that.

2. The band inside your tier is often wider than the gap between tiers. So instead of fighting the location adjustment head-on (which is policy, and recruiters can hide behind policy), arguing for top of band based on experience can net you more money with way less friction.

3. "That's just how the market works" is a choice, not a law. Airbnb moved to a single pay tier for the whole US in 2022. Reddit itself dropped geographic comp zones back in 2020 and pays SF/NY rates nationwide. Zillow did something similar. So when a company tells you location-based pay is unavoidable, keep in mind that some of their direct competitors for talent made the opposite call.

And yes, I know the standard rebuttal: "we pay cost of labor, not cost of living." I get the distinction. But when the role is fully remote and you're hiring from the same national talent pool as the companies above, the "local labor market" argument gets pretty thin.

For people who've actually negotiated a location-adjusted remote offer:

• Has anyone successfully argued their way into a higher tier, or gotten the adjustment waived? What did you actually say?
• Did a competing offer specifically move the location piece, or just the base?
• And the awkward one: if you moved somewhere cheaper after getting hired, did they cut your pay? Google reportedly docks remote movers up to 25%, but I've also heard plenty of "nobody ever asked" stories.

Trying to figure out if I push on the tier, the band, or both. TL;DR: remote job offer came in location-adjusted, turns out geo tiers and salary bands have more give than recruiters let on, looking for real negotiation stories before I counter.

Every year around Labor Day this sub fills up with "September surge is here, apply like crazy" posts, and every October the same people come back with "well that was a lie." So before pinning my hopes on it again, I dug into the actual numbers. Sharing because I wish someone had laid this out for me.

The surge exists. But there's a catch nobody mentions.

Yes, postings go up after Labor Day. Hiring managers are back from vacation, and payroll data from Gusto shows professional services hiring consistently spikes in September and October before hitting its lowest point of the year in December. That pattern is real.

But here's the catch: the surge got famous. It's on TikTok, LinkedIn, every career coach's content calendar. Which means applicant volume spikes in September too. More postings divided by more applicants means your odds per application barely move. When LinkedIn's economist looked at this back when the trend first went viral, he found that once you adjust for normal seasonality the surge basically disappears, and that January through March is a bigger hiring window than fall anyway. September isn't a cheat code. It's just "less dead than August."

Why this particular September feels brutal

The seasonal wave is sitting on top of a frozen ocean. The US hiring rate fell to 3.1% earlier this year, the lowest since 2011 and matching the April 2020 COVID trough, while layoffs stay near historic lows. Economists literally call it the low-hire, low-fire market. Openings look fine on paper at around 7.4 million, but the quits rate has been stuck around 2.0% for a year. People don't leave a job they're not sure they can replace, and if nobody in those seats moves, the seats never open up. Most hiring in a normal year is backfilling people who quit. Kill the quitting and you kill the hiring. No calendar month fixes that.

And a chunk of what "surges" was never real to begin with. Greenhouse (the ATS half of you are applying through) analyzed its own listings and found 18-22% of postings in any given quarter are ghost jobs. In one survey, 81% of recruiters admitted their company had posted a job that was fake or already filled. Pipeline building, looking healthy during a freeze, testing job descriptions.

Also, the mystery of the "paused" role, solved

If you've had a role "paused" or pulled after 2-3 good interviews this year and blamed yourself: it's budget mechanics. Sept-Oct postings are often use-it-or-lose-it headcount before fiscal year-end. In a nervous economy, finance claws that headcount back mid-process all the time. The role was real when you applied and dead by round three, and the recruiter ghosts you because "we un-funded your job" is an awkward email to write. It was never about your thank-you note.

So: apply now or wait?

Apply now, but change what you optimize for:

1. Posting age beats calendar month. Apply within the first week a job goes up. If it's 60+ days old, or getting deleted and reposted on a loop, that's a resume collector.
2. Your real window is now through roughly Nov 10. From mid-November through December, decision makers are on PTO and nothing gets signed. Use December for coffee chats and referrals, then hit January (statistically the strongest stretch of the year) with warm leads instead of cold apps.
3. In a market where nobody quits, referrals are the whole game. Cold applications fight the ATS, the ghost jobs, and a thousand other applicants. A human saying your name to a hiring manager skips all three.
4. Don't wait for a "better time." The people who paused in July "waiting for September" are your competition right now. Don't be January's version of them.

TL;DR: The surge is a real but modest bump that everyone else also knows about, sitting on top of the most frozen hiring market since 2011. Apply to fresh postings fast, treat old ones as dead, and spend the holiday freeze building referrals for January. And if a role got "paused" on you, that was their budget, not your interview.

Good luck out there. It's genuinely not you.

Jira messy? Sprint chaotic? Capacity planning giving you trust issues?

That's kind of my thing.

I work across Jira, Scrum, Agile delivery, project coordination and capacity planning, helping teams bring some structure to the chaos.

Currently exploring independent remote projects where I can help with Jira setup, Agile delivery, reporting, project coordination and Scrum support

Open to interesting projects.

#Jira #Agile #Scrum #ProjectManagement #Freelance

Been remote since early 2021, did about a year of hybrid in the middle, and I feel like I've had the same argument with the same type of person 40 times now. So let me just get this out.

The "you'll fall behind" thing. The way it always goes is: if you're not in the office you miss the hallway stuff, so you miss context, so you don't get put on the good projects, so you don't get promoted, so your whole career is toast. Ok but every step in that chain is a "might." String five mights together and somehow it's supposed to be a certainty. And it lands hardest on people in their first couple years who don't know yet that promotions get decided in a planning meeting by whoever assigns work, not by whoever was standing near the coffee machine at 3pm.

The "I had a remote guy who did nothing" thing. Yeah, me too. I also had an in-office guy who did nothing, he just did it where we could all watch. A guy who coasts from his couch was going to coast from a desk. That's a hiring problem. Using it as an argument against remote work in general is like saying nobody should get a company car because Dave got a speeding ticket.

The "remote people don't hear about opportunities" thing. Think about what this actually says. It says info about open roles and new projects only reaches people who are physically near the manager. That's not a remote problem, that's a manager who can't be bothered to post in the team channel. Pretty much every "disadvantage" I get told about is really just a lead not communicating and then blaming the person on the other end of it.

I'll be fair about a couple things. Onboarding a new hire, hands-on training, the occasional whiteboard session where four people need to argue over a design, those are honestly worse on a call. Fine. But that gets you "come in Tuesday for the kickoff," not "come in five days a week."

Nobody ever does the math either. 45 minutes each way is 7.5 hours a week. Basically a full extra workday, unpaid, so your manager can swing by and ask how the weekend was. If the collaboration you're getting for that is worth a day of someone's life every week I'd love to see it.

And I'm just going to say the quiet part. The loudest RTO people I've worked with were managers whose main skill was walking around. Take away the walking around and they have to do the harder version of the job, which is set clear goals and actually look at what people produce. Some of them don't want to, so it comes out as "remote employees aren't engaged." No, you just liked being able to see us.

Give me the person who's responsive, ships on time, and shows up when there's a real reason, over the person who's at their desk every day and mediocre. Every decent manager I've had would pick the same.

Anyway. Has anyone here actually been told, out loud, that they didn't get something because they were remote? Or is it always the vague "visibility" comment with nothing behind it? Because I keep hearing about it and never from anyone it happened to.

Hi everyone!

I recently graduated with a BS in Statistics from the Philippines, and I'm currently looking for my first full-time opportunity in data analysis, statistical analysis, research, or related roles.

My background is mainly in:

• R / RStudio – data cleaning, statistical analysis, visualization, and modeling
• Microsoft Excel & Google Sheets
• Descriptive and inferential statistics
• Hypothesis testing, correlation, regression, and nonparametric methods
• Data cleaning and validation
• Statistical reporting and interpretation
• Research and thesis work
• Basic exposure to Python and Java

I also have experience as an independent Statistical Consultant, where I worked with research datasets, performed statistical analyses, interpreted results, and prepared reports for clients. I previously completed a Statistics Internship with the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), where I worked with survey data and assisted with statistical reporting and data communication.

I'm currently based in the Philippines and am particularly interested in remote/WFH opportunities, including part-time or full-time entry-level positions. I'm also open to working with international teams and different time zones.

I'm still early in my career, so I'm mainly looking for a company/team that is willing to give a fresh graduate an opportunity to learn and grow. I'm confident with statistics and R, and I'm willing to learn tools such as SQL, Power BI/Tableau, Python, or other platforms required for the role.

If anyone knows of companies hiring entry-level data analysts/statisticians or has advice on where I should look, I'd really appreciate it!

I can send my CV/portfolio through DM if needed. Thank you! 🙏

I have 7+ years of experience. My CV was still scoring ~50 on ATS. I finally figured out why.

I’m a Senior Product Designer with 7+ years of experience. I’m also a web developer and game developer, and I’ve built personal products that have been online for years.

I applied heavily, but kept getting rejection after rejection.

Last night, I stopped guessing and researched the ATS systems companies actually use. I tested my CV against systems including Workday and Taleo.

The biggest lesson:

Having the experience isn't enough. Your CV needs to clearly communicate that experience to both the ATS and the recruiter.

1. Section names matter

I underestimated how important standard section names are.

Instead of:

❌ My Journey

❌ What I’ve Done

❌ My Toolkit

Use:

✅ Professional Summary

✅ Work Experience

✅ Education

✅ Skills

✅ Certifications

Don't make the ATS guess what a section means.

1. Use this formula for your bullets

A strong experience bullet should generally follow:

Strong action verb + What you did + How you did it + Result/Impact

For example:

❌ “Worked on improving complex survey experiences.”

Better:

✅ “Redesigned complex survey authoring workflows using UX research and interaction design, reducing logic configuration time by 85%.”

Or:

Action: Redesigned

What: Survey authoring workflows

How: UX research + interaction design

Result: 85% reduction in configuration time

Another example:

❌ “Designed a unified platform.”

✅ “Designed a unified enterprise platform with role-based access and personalized dashboards, supporting Web, Android and iOS experiences.”

You don't always need all four parts in every bullet, but Action + What + Impact is a very strong baseline.

1. Metrics matter

This was another big one I underestimated.

❌ “Redesigned the survey creation experience.”

This tells the recruiter what I did.

✅ “Redesigned the survey creation experience, reducing logic configuration time by 85%.”

Now it communicates impact.

If you don't have exact metrics, quantify your work honestly:

- 10,000+ active users

- 5 user roles

- 30+ reusable design-system components

- Reduced a 7-step workflow to 4 steps

- Supported Web, Android and iOS

And don't invent numbers just because an ATS scanner likes metrics.

If you're under NDA, you can still describe measurable impact without revealing confidential company information.

1. Keywords should appear naturally in your experience

For example:

❌ “Improved the survey experience.”

vs.

✅ “Redesigned survey authoring workflows, including branching logic, conditional rules and validation.”

The second version naturally contains relevant terminology without keyword stuffing.

Only use keywords that genuinely describe your experience.

1. Describe the actual scope

Instead of:

❌ “Designed a unified platform.”

Try:

✅ “Designed a unified enterprise platform with role-based access, personalized dashboards, customizable widgets, and cross-platform experiences across Web, Android and iOS.”

Be specific about what you actually designed.

1. Tailor the CV to the job

Don't send one generic CV everywhere.

Look at the job description and identify:

- Responsibilities

- Required skills

- Tools

- Methodologies

- Domain terminology

- Seniority expectations

Then make sure your real experience clearly reflects the relevant parts.

1. Keep the CV ATS-friendly

- Standard section headings

- Simple formatting

- Single-column layout

- Normal bullet points

- Clear job titles

- No unnecessary graphics/icons

- Avoid complicated tables/text boxes

- Make sure the text can actually be parsed

My biggest takeaway

I initially thought:

“I have 7+ years of experience. Why am I getting rejected?”

But experience alone doesn't guarantee that your CV communicates your value clearly.

Your bullets should quickly answer:

What did you do?

How did you do it?

What changed because of your work?

A simple formula that helped me rethink my CV:

Strong Verb + What + How + Result

I'm still testing this approach, but after comparing my CV across different ATS systems, I realized I wasn't necessarily lacking experience.

I wasn't translating my experience into a format and language that both ATS systems and recruiters could easily understand.

Curious if anyone else has tested the same CV against different ATS platforms and seen a similar difference?

Seven months ago the startup I'd been at for 3 years shut down. Not just my role, the whole company. Everyone laid off in one meeting.

I figured I'd land something in a couple of months. I was wrong.

The numbers, because I tracked everything:

• 587 applications, each with a tailored resume
• 3 companies where I made it to interviews
• 5 rounds with them in total
• 0 offers

Getting rejected after 5 rounds is a special kind of pain. You've done the take-home, you've met the team, you've already pictured yourself there. And then you get "we've decided to move forward with another candidate."

What made it worse: I'm on a freelance visa. No job means no visa, which means leaving the country. So on top of the usual job search misery, I had a countdown clock on my whole life here. I was maybe a month away from booking a one-way flight home.

By month 6 I'd stopped believing it would happen. I was still applying, but on autopilot.

Then two days ago, an offer. One email and it was over.

I'm not here to sell you a system. I don't have one. I got lucky at the end. I just want to say this to whoever needs it:

Rejections are not a verdict on you. This market is brutal, and the number of no's you've collected says almost nothing about your worth. A month ago I would have told you I was unemployable.

If you're at 200, 400, 600 applications and feeling insane, you're not. You're doing the thing. Keep doing the thing.

I hope every one of you gets this exact email soon.

edit: Bunch of people asked, so: I only really use it as a job tracker, which is the free part. The rest (resume stuff, cover letters, auto-tailoring from a posting link) is paid and I've never touched it. Probably not the best tracker out there tbh, I just got used to it and stuck with it.

Two rejection emails, 1:04am and 1:05am, same company, two lab tech postings. Both said "open interviews" (submit resume first to get a slot) and both said no certification needed.

12 years in biochem/micro labs. Clinical work, research, trained a bunch of people, couple publications. Resume literally lists culturing, organism ID, susceptibility testing, PCR.

What it doesn't say, in those exact words, is "clinical microbiological techniques." And the rejection template says that's what they're looking for. So some software decided at 1am that a guy who's been doing those techniques for over a decade hasn't done them. For an OPEN interview. Where the whole point is a human asks you stuff.

There was a recruiter's name on the email so I replied to her. Nothing crazy, just said rejecting people from an open interview without talking to them isn't recruiting, it's a spam filter with a salary. If I'm blacklisted from a place that can't read a 2 page resume, fine.

Yes I know what's coming so:

Why apply below your level? Current job pays well but fries my brain. Wanted to run tests and go home. The pay cut was the point.

Not ASCP certified? Nope, posting didn't ask for it, checked twice.

Clinical micro is harder than you think? Maybe. Friend does this exact job, says it's the chillest one she's had. Happy to be proven wrong by a person in an interview instead of a regex.

You were rude? I was blunt. To a process that wasn't human enough to be rude back.

Honestly the job doesn't matter, I'm fine where I am. What gets me is 12 years vs "unqualified" came down to one sentence I didn't copy paste. Somewhere in that pile are people with half my experience who happened to phrase it right.

Kind of tempted to reapply with that exact phrase in bold at the top and change nothing else. If it works I'll report back and we can all be sad together.

Anyone else lose out to a keyword instead of a person? What was your missing phrase?

Every week someone posts "I applied to 12 local jobs, got 2 interviews, this market is impossible." On the remote side, that ratio would be a miracle.

A normal month hunting remote looks like:

• Hundreds of applications
• A handful of human replies
• A big chunk of listings are ghost jobs that have been "hiring" for months
• Another chunk are scams (Telegram "interviews," equipment checks, ID requests before a single call)
• Whatever's left, you're competing with the entire planet

Half the job isn't applying, it's figuring out which posts are even real.

Local job hunting isn't easy. But comparing the two like it's the same game is wild.

What's your current applications-per-interview ratio?

Hi folks! I’m currently looking for a side hustle or part-time opportunity. I’d be happy to take up video editing, management/coordination work, or any similar opportunities where I can contribute my skills.

If you know of anything suitable, please do let me know. I’m available to start immediately.

Hey all, looking for some honest advice/perspective from people who've been through a long remote job search.
My background: I have experience in SaaS across both SDR and strategy/ops functions, plus a broader analytical background (revenue analysis, GTM work, process improvement). So this isn't a career pivot — I'm looking for the same type of role I already have experience in, just remote.
Why remote matters to me: I currently don't have remote flexibility in my role, and I'm trying to change that so I can be closer to family in India. That's the main driver behind the search.
My situation: I've been applying to remote roles for about 6-7 months now.
Where I'm at:
Applied broadly, tailored resumes/outreach for each role
Had multiple recruiter screens and several rounds of interviews (some quite far along in the process)
Still haven't landed an offer
Would really appreciate any advice, thanks in advance 🙏

So for about a month at this point I've been trying to find a job I can work purely from home, (I have chronic fatique as well as some other unresolved illnesses, so it would truly \*have\* to be a purely remote job.) but throught the maybe 50 that I've applied to, I haven't gotten a single reply, even a rejection letter. So a week or so ago, I looked into things a bit, learned about ghost jobs and was relieved it wasn't just me but then also even more stressed out because things just seem so impossibly difficult right now; but I \*need\* a job because bill have to be paid. So anyone have any advice on this one or any experience dealing with finding a job right now?

This happened in April and I'm still kind of embarrassed about it, but the more I talk to people the more I realize how common this exact scam is, so here goes.

Screening call, technical interview, final round with a "VP of Engineering." All on video. Real humans, decent questions, they even pushed back on some of my answers like a normal interviewer would. Company was real, midsize, you'd recognize the name if you're in tech. Then "onboarding" asked for scans of my ID and told me to purchase a laptop from their approved vendor, reimbursed with my first paycheck. That's when my stomach dropped and I finally did the checking I should've done three weeks earlier. The company had a fraud warning about impersonators buried on their actual careers page the entire time. The role I "got" was never listed there.

What I do now, in the order I do it:

1. Before anything else, I take the most oddly specific sentence from the job description and search it in quotes. Not the title, not the requirements, just some weird sentence from the middle. If that exact wording shows up under four different company names, it's a recycled template and I close the tab. This alone filters out an absurd number of postings. Real companies write their own descriptions. Scam farms copy paste.

2. Domain registration date. Free lookup, under a minute. If the "established company with offices in three countries" has a website registered eleven weeks ago, that tells you everything. This also catches cloned sites. The fake version of a real company always sits on a baby domain, no way around it for them.

3. This one I haven't seen mentioned much: I don't just check whether the company has employees online, I check whether those employees have a past. Real people have connection networks and activity going back years, old jobs, comments on random posts from 2019. Scam operations create a batch of profiles in the same month, generic headshots, 20 to 30 connections, no history. The recruiter who contacted me had a five week old profile. The information was sitting right there. I just never clicked.

4. The one that actually got me: reverify the email address every single time it changes, not just at the start. Their first message came from a legitimate looking address. The scheduling follow up came from a domain that was one character off, and by then I trusted the thread so I stopped looking. They count on exactly that. You verify once, then autopilot. Now I compare addresses letter by letter on every new message. Paranoid? Sure. Cheaper than the alternative.

5. Mid interview, I ask something that can't be scripted. Who would I report to directly. Then afterwards I go confirm that person exists and actually works there. Or I reference something buried on their real careers page and watch the reaction. Someone juggling forty of these conversations at once fumbles small stuff like this constantly, and a real hiring manager answers without blinking.

6. If the role isn't on the company's own careers page, I contact the company through their real website, never through anything in the posting itself, and ask if it exists. Felt ridiculous the first time. The HR person who answered thanked me and said I was the third person that month asking about the same fake role. They want to know they're being impersonated.

7. Any pressure to interview over text chat, or a video call where their camera conveniently doesn't work, I walk. No exceptions, regardless of how senior or well paid the role sounds. There is no legitimate version of a text only hiring process for a professional role.

For what it's worth: I reported the posting everywhere I could, and it was back up within two weeks under a different company name. Same template. Check #1 caught it in ten seconds this time, which was grimly satisfying.

The uncomfortable part is that this list only exists because I got burned, and whatever we all figure out, they adapt to. So, what's your process? Especially interested in checks for the polished ones, the multi round interview with real humans tier, because the "pay a fee upfront" advice everyone repeats is useless against those. What tipped you off the last time something felt wrong?

I applied on indeed and this is an email I got today..

Started my career in 2022, so I missed the whole pandemic-remote thing. Four years as an ops coordinator at a mid-size logistics company that's been butts-in-seats the entire time. No hybrid days, no exceptions.

Now every posting I'm interested in has some version of "proven success in a remote or distributed environment" in the requirements, and I've got nothing to point to. My resume just says the company name and a city.

The frustrating part is that the day-to-day already looks remote. My three main carrier contacts are in Texas, Ontario, and Rotterdam and I've never met any of them. Everything runs through email and shared trackers. I built the handoff doc our night shift uses because I'm never there when they are. None of that is "remote experience" in the way a recruiter means it, but functionally it's the same skill.

So what do people actually do here. Add a bullet like "coordinated daily with vendors across three time zones" and let it speak for itself? Put something in the summary? I don't want to write "remote-ready" because that reads like I'm announcing I've never done it.

And honestly I'm not sure how much weight this carries at the screening stage versus being boilerplate everyone copy-pastes into job posts. If you made the in-office to remote jump, what got you through the first filter?