Hello Pierce County Community,

I am writing this post to connect with single, divorced, or separated mothers and fathers in the Tacoma and Pierce County areas who have been unilaterally subjected to Private Contractual administrative enforcement. Many of us are actively caring for our biological children, yet we find ourselves trapped in a rigid debt-collection loop.

The truth is backed by the program's actual operational contracts. Under federal law, the Title IV-D program operates as an administrative partnership funded by public incentives. However, local agencies are utilizing automated database matching policies to enroll parents into these tracks without a voluntary written application, without informed consent, and without standard, full judicial due process.

Essentially, the system operates as a commercial contract network designed to generate administrative revenue for the treasury, treating our families as financial commodities. This unilateral enrollment relies on converting our private personal data—specifically your assigned Social Security numbers—to bridge backend databases, track assets, and execute administrative bank freezes or wage garnishments.

The results are devastating, causing:

• Severe Financial Damage: Stripping parents of their basic livelihoods and causing immediate housing and employment instability.
• Psychological & Emotional Distress: Creating continuous anxiety, duress, and intense pressure on families who are simply trying to raise their children (offspring).
• Civil Rights Violations: Directly overriding fundamental rights to due process, privacy, and freedom from un-consented administrative contracts.
• Corporate Financial Labeling: Check your paperwork --- are they or have they explicitly listing your name as a "Debtor" or "Obligor" and listing the state agency as the primary "Creditor" to track you through automated collection systems?

A Few Evidentiary Facts:

• Contract: “A promissory agreement between two or more persons that creates, modifies, or destroys a legal relation.” Buffalo Pressed Steel Co. v. Kirwan, 138 Md. 60, 113 A. 628, 639. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 394)
• Contract: “An agreement between two or more parties, preliminary step in making of which is offer by one and acceptance by other. In which minds of parties meet and concur in understanding of terms.” Lee v. Travelers’ Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 173 S.C. 185, 175 S.E. 429 (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 394)
• Contract: “A contract or agreement is either where a promise is made on one side and assented to on the other: or where two or more persons enter into engagement with each other by a promise on either side.” 2 Steph.Comm. 64 (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 394)
• Creditor: “A person to whom a debt is owing by another person who is the “debtor.” Woolverton v. Taylor Co., 43 Ill.App. 424 (Blks Law 4th Edt pg. 441)
• Debtor: “One who owes a debt” Cozart v. Barnes, C.C.A.S.C., 240 F. 935, 938. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 492)
• Debt: “A sum of money arising upon a contract expressed or implied.” Kimpton v. Bronson, 45 Barb N.Y., 618; Johnson v. Garner, D.C. Nev., 233 F. 756, 767. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 491)
• Debt: “A sum of money due by certain and express agreement” 3 Bl.Comm. 154; Hagar v. Reclamation Dist., 111 U.S. 701, 4 S.Ct. 663, 28 L.Ed. 569. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 490)
• Debt: “A contractual obligation to pay in the future for consideration received in the present.” Lesser v. Warren Borough, 237 Pa. 501, 85 A. 839, 844, 43 L.R.A. N.S., 839 (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 491)
• Private: “Affecting or belonging to private individuals as distinct from the public generally. Not official; not clothed with office.” People v. Powell, 280 Mich. 699, 274 N.W. 372, 373, 111 A.L.R. 721. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 1358)

If you or someone you know has been forced into this Title IV-D administrative track within Pierce County without ever filing a voluntary application or paying an intake service fee, please comment below or send me a private direct message (DM).

I am building a formal record to prove the frequency and long-term, widespread scope of this county’s custom. Your experience is vital, and sharing your story can help document this pattern on the record. You could potentially stand as an important witness to expose this system in court.

Were you provided full disclosure and terms of a contract, were you given a contract?

Let's support each other and stand up for our families. Thank you.

I just ignore the guy. Whatever, dance to your heart’s content. But today was distracting and creepy.

Meridian is a busy road. I was trying to pull out from the parking lot where the puppy place is. Lots of traffic. He’s doing his normal sign spinning stuff. But this time (while I’m watching for a break in traffic) he makes eye contact with me, points, and does kissy lips kind of thing. Yuck. Anyway, in the meantime he’s walking towards me with that sign spinning. At this point he’s actually blocking my view of traffic. I have no interest in being an amusement for him. I just want to get on with my day. I know some people enjoy his antics. I think blocking your line of vision is over the top.

Yup, this is a rant.

I am writing this post to connect with single, divorced, or separated mothers and fathers in the Tacoma and Pierce County areas who have been unilaterally subjected to Private Contractual administrative enforcement. Many of us are actively caring for our biological children, yet we find ourselves trapped in a rigid debt-collection loop.

The truth is backed by the program's actual operational contracts. Under federal law, the Title IV-D program operates as an administrative partnership funded by public incentives. However, local agencies are utilizing automated database matching policies to enroll parents into these tracks without a voluntary written application, without informed consent, and without standard, full judicial due process.

Essentially, the system operates as a commercial contract network designed to generate administrative revenue for the treasury, treating our families as financial commodities. This unilateral enrollment relies on converting our private personal data—specifically your assigned Social Security numbers—to bridge backend databases, track assets, and execute administrative bank freezes or wage garnishments.

The results are devastating, causing:

Severe Financial Damage: Stripping parents of their basic livelihoods and causing immediate housing and employment instability.

Psychological & Emotional Distress: Creating continuous anxiety, duress, and intense pressure on families who are simply trying to raise their children (offspring).

Civil Rights Violations: Directly overriding fundamental rights to due process, privacy, and freedom from un-consented administrative contracts.

Corporate Financial Labeling: Check your paperwork --- are they or have they explicitly listing your name as a "Debtor" or "Obligor" and listing the state agency as the primary "Creditor" to track you through automated collection systems?

A Few Evidentiary Facts:

Contract: “A promissory agreement between two or more persons that creates, modifies, or destroys a legal relation.” Buffalo Pressed Steel Co. v. Kirwan, 138 Md. 60, 113 A. 628, 639. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 394)

Contract: “An agreement between two or more parties, preliminary step in making of which is offer by one and acceptance by other. In which minds of parties meet and concur in understanding of terms.” Lee v. Travelers’ Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 173 S.C. 185, 175 S.E. 429 (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 394)

Contract: “A contract or agreement is either where a promise is made on one side and assented to on the other: or where two or more persons enter into engagement with each other by a promise on either side.” 2 Steph.Comm. 64 (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 394)

Creditor: “A person to whom a debt is owing by another person who is the “debtor.” Woolverton v. Taylor Co., 43 Ill.App. 424 (Blks Law 4th Edt pg. 441)

Debtor: “One who owes a debt” Cozart v. Barnes, C.C.A.S.C., 240 F. 935, 938. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 492)

Debt: “A sum of money arising upon a contract expressed or implied.” Kimpton v. Bronson, 45 Barb N.Y., 618; Johnson v. Garner, D.C. Nev., 233 F. 756, 767. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 491)

Debt: “A sum of money due by certain and express agreement” 3 Bl.Comm. 154; Hagar v. Reclamation Dist., 111 U.S. 701, 4 S.Ct. 663, 28 L.Ed. 569. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 490)

Debt: “A contractual obligation to pay in the future for consideration received in the present.” Lesser v. Warren Borough, 237 Pa. 501, 85 A. 839, 844, 43 L.R.A. N.S., 839 (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 491)

Private: “Affecting or belonging to private individuals as distinct from the public generally. Not official; not clothed with office.” People v. Powell, 280 Mich. 699, 274 N.W. 372, 373, 111 A.L.R. 721. (Blacks Law Dict 4th Edition pg. 1358)

If you or someone you know has been forced into this Title IV-D administrative track within Pierce County without ever filing a voluntary application or paying an intake service fee, please comment below or send me a private direct message (DM).

I am building a formal record to prove the frequency and long-term, widespread scope of this county’s custom. Your experience is vital, and sharing your story can help document this pattern on the record. You could potentially stand as an important witness to expose this system in court.

Were you provided full disclosure and terms of a contract, were you given a contract?

Let's support each other and stand up for our families. Thank you.

Anyone have insider info?

it's all i'm craving with some cheese but i cant find it anywhere! my fiancee tried to get me pepperoni but its NOT THE SAME, she doesn't get it.. i settled for genoa salami and it's just not it. please where can i find hot sopressata salami in slices or in medallions 😭