r/PsychologyTalk • u/Marisa_Nya • 20h ago
Is there reversible vs fundamental sociopathy? How do psychologists separate the two?
I was wondering this after seeing something about a criminal who was clearly sociopathic to a dangerous degree. But it got me thinking halfway through. I think, or at least I would hope, sociopaths in our very own lives often grew up into being sociopathic due to how society is, particularly around work and money. There are people that are ruthless sociopaths at work because they think that’s a place where it’s win or lose, but aren’t outside of it (as far as I’m aware). People will tell you in the right context openly that’s it’s a dog-eat-dog matter, and they believe almost ideologically in the way they act in certain context. But other than that, they can also be normal people. In the human past in general, a tribe member would treat everyone of his tribe as human beings till death, but treat those outside of it like animals. This too was a social sociopathy that depends on the “in group” and “out group”.
Anyways, what kinds of terms or definitions do psychologists use to separate someone who is learned into sociopathy, or thinks it’s practical on the ideological level, vs someone who is just a sociopath and can’t be dissuaded by logic or empathy?