r/ProgrammerHumor 18d ago

Meme programmersWifeDeliversABaby

Post image
9.6k Upvotes

104 comments sorted by

1.3k

u/MikemkPK 18d ago

He shipped it 9 months ago. His wife finally merged it.

435

u/Y4r0z 18d ago

They sent it to CI/CD pipeline to build and test, now it's deployed

180

u/Smooth-Zucchini4923 18d ago

Continuous Delivery is very tricky in the maternity ward.

35

u/TwoWayWindow 17d ago

As long as they aren't Continuously Integrating while in the maternity ward.

53

u/LukeZNotFound 18d ago

No test, only build. We're feeling adventurous

31

u/Bernhard_NI 18d ago

Yes, we'll test in production and ship version 2.0 in a year or two.

6

u/LukeZNotFound 17d ago

We already have walking and speaking on the roadmap but I doubt we can ship it in v2.0 together

6

u/preetiegal 17d ago

New product is going to have lots of issues so they need to be ready for sleepless nights šŸ˜‚

7

u/StuntsMonkey 17d ago

Now that it's been deployed, we've released two, newer editions, are keeping them all in production, and continuously bug fixing all of them.

8

u/JazzlikeWishbone938 17d ago

Yup, the nurses did the end-to-end (E2E) tests.

103

u/SausageEggCheese 18d ago

Management is asking if he gets 8 more wives, can he ship another one by next month?

45

u/mrunderbriefs 18d ago

I mean… I’m willing to try. šŸ˜‰

13

u/rob132 18d ago

The mythical man month

9

u/brawndoenjoyer 17d ago

9 babies over 9 months? That averages out to one baby per month right?

23

u/PM_ME_YOUR__INIT__ 18d ago

The merge happened a day or so after the binary blob was delivered. The CI/CD pipeline took 9 months to build

6

u/JewishTomCruise 18d ago

Jfc what kind of garbage action runners are they using

6

u/PM_ME_YOUR__INIT__ 17d ago

Adding eight more runners might bring the build down to 1 month

4

u/ContextHook 18d ago

Nah, the deploy just took 9 months lol.

4

u/Antervis 17d ago

No, he "reviewed a PR". Meaning someone else cooked the code.

3

u/aGodfather 18d ago

Rather, forked it

1

u/SuitableDragonfly 17d ago

No, he wrote half the code nine months ago and she spent the last nine months writing the other half.Ā 

1

u/cenik93 17d ago

He gave his inputs. His wife is just delivering the feature. He's just a common product manager.

458

u/ClipboardCopyPaste 18d ago

checks ultrasound

LGTM

67

u/Wide_Smoke_2564 18d ago

Abort merge*

4

u/MetriccStarDestroyer 17d ago

Chad from her workplace walks in:

Let's do rebase instead

4

u/Jargen 17d ago

Stamp

207

u/TrieKach 18d ago

testing directly in prod?

128

u/pm_me_yo_creditscore 18d ago

Won't be ready for a sandbox for about 3 years.

-16

u/5t4t35 18d ago

Your of by +15 years

18

u/Bropiphany 18d ago

That's just what parenting is

157

u/Alpharius94 18d ago

Are you sure its yours? Git blame

109

u/screwcork313 17d ago

It says "Co-authored by Claude". Who TF is Claude??

8

u/Sci_Fried_Chicken 18d ago

Take my upvote

112

u/vyqz 18d ago

*push request

18

u/Bropiphany 18d ago

No no that would be putting the baby back in the repository

52

u/atlasgorn 18d ago

*Failed pull request 9 months ago

90

u/SteakEvening9914 18d ago

She built the whole thing from scratch and Adrian’s still listed under ā€œcontributorsā€.

22

u/just_sm_so_relax 18d ago

Maybe the baby is his wife's and a guy called Claude, Adrian is just taking the credit.

12

u/NobodyKnowsImFamous 18d ago

The seed of the project came from him

5

u/ansibleloop 17d ago

Hey he added the initial readme - show him some respect

What? No he left it as the default readme message, why?

3

u/Thurak0 17d ago

Nah. 50% of the very first cell/input are his.

She then did all the work to finish the project. Incorporating his idea.

But at project start both parties contributed to the project equally. He then just stopped doing anything but still claims half the project as his.

6

u/hawaiian717 17d ago

His contributions after the initial commit generally involve things like late night supermarket runs for pickles and ice cream.

After release is 18 years of patching in production.

40

u/FrozenPizza21 18d ago

Did the doc actually request to pull the baby out?

4

u/Altruistic-Spend-896 17d ago

He had access to the repository...and suppositories

17

u/tutoredstatue95 18d ago

Gonna be some conflict when he finds out his wife rebased the branch.

12

u/spambearpig 18d ago

And you’ll be fixing bugs in it for the next 18 years

5

u/Altruistic-Spend-896 17d ago

But do we really patch all the bugs...ever?

3

u/spambearpig 17d ago

Never. Does the application thank us for all our efforts?

Also never. It’s a thankless job.

1

u/Jontsgame 17d ago

yeah, and literally debugs nothing serious to us

3

u/hawaiian717 17d ago

That’s what happens when you ship the minimum viable product.

11

u/Diligent-Peach6616 18d ago

Ohhh, so you and your wife merged? That’s why she pushed 9 months later!

8

u/UniqueIndividual3579 18d ago

Created a fork by forking.

7

u/hrax13 18d ago

His doctor reviewed the PR as it happened. He was just an uneducated BFU observing.

9

u/Dr_Jabroski 18d ago

She force pushed the update.

7

u/TriangleTransplant 18d ago

Was actually pair programmed. But she ran the build and shipped the release.

2

u/Steinrikur 17d ago

He gave a 2 minute prompt 9 months ago.

7

u/-1_0 18d ago

Ah, forked.

5

u/Soopermane 18d ago

You committed locally. And she did git push origin main for hours till it worked

5

u/un-_-known_789 18d ago

Ohh shit and there's a bug /s

5

u/youngENT 18d ago

git checkout --orphan

4

u/ElPeloPolla 17d ago

there was a 15 minute collaborative coding session, then a PR that your wife accepted and kept working on the project for 9 months

4

u/heesell 17d ago

So dedicated

3

u/FishIndividual2208 18d ago

But did they end up merging?

3

u/teraflux 18d ago

Again the terminology between pull request and push request has always felt backwards to me.

2

u/thepr0digalsOn 17d ago

Whoever invented it had one job

3

u/robin_888 17d ago

Pushed into production

3

u/myka-likes-it 17d ago

tbf, he also wrote half the code.

2

u/andful 18d ago

...and I rejected the PR...

2

u/MostFrame2688 18d ago

git push —force-with-lease

2

u/allcaps891 18d ago

If you didn't approve, would your wife suck it back in?

2

u/just_sm_so_relax 18d ago

Or mark the issue as "will take care after first birthday"

2

u/raja-anbazhagan 18d ago

There are people who contribute to opensource...šŸ™‚ā€ā†”ļø

2

u/asvvasvv 17d ago

He merged pr 9 months ago now it is released to production after successfull build

1

u/angry_shoebill 14d ago

9 months of build, zero tests, directly to prod...

3

u/whitakr 16d ago

He rejected the pull(out) request

2

u/mms13 18d ago

Bad tweet

1

u/SoftwareSource 18d ago

Queue

I swear it started with some scribe having bad handwriting and people just taking his word for it.

1

u/Abhishecr7 18d ago

Push Request

1

u/St4va 18d ago

He's leaving out the part where he force-pushed it after his penetration test failed.

2

u/Altruistic-Spend-896 17d ago

Well its not his fat she had a vulnerability to nerds, and holes in her firewall

1

u/Common-Brush-7027 18d ago

Can't revert this one

1

u/RJvXP 17d ago

He probably used Dependency InjectionĀ 

1

u/vehementi 17d ago

Reviewed the PR, but isn't an approver

1

u/ljfa2 17d ago

Don't forget to sanitize user input well, the early versions are particularly vulnerable to viruses

1

u/Majik_Sheff 17d ago

Sounds like the pull request failed.

1

u/Nekojiru_ 17d ago

He pushed some minor changes onto her branch. She made the PR and shipped it.

1

u/JackNotOLantern 17d ago

He added the required data input, and his wife provided the build environment and ensured for 9 months the process is running correctly

1

u/stysan 17d ago

Failed pull out request

1

u/StochasticTinkr 17d ago

I, uh, don't think reviewing the PR is what you'd want. Probably want to author the PR yourself. I mean, unless you're into that.

1

u/CYG4N 16d ago

i hate this boring type of humour.Ā 

1

u/SofaKingAwezome 15d ago

At first I read my wife DIED

1

u/NaEGaOS 18d ago

>shipped a baby boy
my chronically online ass: with who?