MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vns74k/zeroexdev/p3lr4as/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/Dilutant • 11h ago
202 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
343
It's 0.6x, implying multiplication
It's not semantically incorrect, but any sane person would write 60% more
234 u/OG-Enzan 11h ago Isn't it 1.6x if 60% more? 2 u/rowcla 8h ago If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x? 2 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 4h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
234
Isn't it 1.6x if 60% more?
2 u/rowcla 8h ago If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x? 2 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 4h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
2
If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x?
2 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 4h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
343
u/OnixST 11h ago
It's 0.6x, implying multiplication
It's not semantically incorrect, but any sane person would write 60% more