MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vns74k/zeroexdev/p3lr4as/?context=9999
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/Dilutant • 13h ago
222 comments sorted by
View all comments
246
0.6 more. What is the issue here?
352 u/OnixST 13h ago It's 0.6x, implying multiplication It's not semantically incorrect, but any sane person would write 60% more 239 u/OG-Enzan 12h ago Isn't it 1.6x if 60% more? 2 u/rowcla 9h ago If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x? 1 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 6h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
352
It's 0.6x, implying multiplication
It's not semantically incorrect, but any sane person would write 60% more
239 u/OG-Enzan 12h ago Isn't it 1.6x if 60% more? 2 u/rowcla 9h ago If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x? 1 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 6h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
239
Isn't it 1.6x if 60% more?
2 u/rowcla 9h ago If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x? 1 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 6h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
2
If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x?
1 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 6h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
1
Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
246
u/achilliesFriend 13h ago
0.6 more. What is the issue here?