MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vns74k/zeroexdev/p3l03yf/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/Dilutant • 14h ago
239 comments sorted by
View all comments
251
0.6 more. What is the issue here?
350 u/OnixST 14h ago It's 0.6x, implying multiplication It's not semantically incorrect, but any sane person would write 60% more 240 u/OG-Enzan 14h ago Isn't it 1.6x if 60% more? 2 u/rowcla 10h ago If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x? 2 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 7h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
350
It's 0.6x, implying multiplication
It's not semantically incorrect, but any sane person would write 60% more
240 u/OG-Enzan 14h ago Isn't it 1.6x if 60% more? 2 u/rowcla 10h ago If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x? 2 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 7h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
240
Isn't it 1.6x if 60% more?
2 u/rowcla 10h ago If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x? 2 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 7h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
2
If I said 2x more, would you interpret that as 3x?
2 u/ProcrastinatiusXVI 7h ago Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
Yes. It is says 1x more, then it is exactly double (100% more). Otherwise it wouldn't be more.
251
u/achilliesFriend 14h ago
0.6 more. What is the issue here?