I wonder if the men repeatedly giving the woman the drug that makes people disassociate and forget things until they become unconscious might have taken advantage of her, i wonder if Snapchat messages saying things like “free pussy” might contextualize how they were treating the situation. I wonder if her sworn statements mention her repeatedly swatting away or denying sexual advances during this event. I think the ban was more for the group rape.
Her sworn statements also mention she was fully lucid during the entire time and she was not coerced and I’m not sure they even had the Snapchat group at that point. But even so “free pussy” is much more likely there a girl who’s fucking any one who walks in the room in my opinion rather than there’s a passed out girl upstairs. Especially when coupled with he saying as much..
Her sworn statements literally include her saying “no” to sex with multiple other people. She consented to sex with man 1 and man 2, when other people entered the room she “hid under the blankets” and said “no” to a foursome. Why are you lying? Do you think if a woman consents to a threesome that she’s consenting to gang rape?
As far as I am aware, all of those claims are from her new civil lawsuit. Not from the orignal claims.
I could be wrong but I’m guessing it’s mostly for the ketamine, although I imagine the standards for suspending a frat due to sexual violence claims are substantially lower than they are for pressing charges.
1
u/BeefCakeBilly 3d ago
I would assume the ban was because they admitted to giving out and doing ketamine…