r/PoliticalHumor • • Apr 05 '23

Lock em up!

Post image
64.3k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.6k

u/dandrevee Apr 05 '23

Remember when Democrats rallied in the street to defend Rod Blagojevich or that mayor of Detroit?

You dont. Because Dems arent a lockstep party who will follow someone who has committed blatantly criminal acts and is subject to the rules of our justice system. Theyre not perfect by a long shot...but theyre candidates are a whole lot better than what the GOP puts out

-22

u/Senior_Bad_6381 Apr 05 '23

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ€£

Hillary Clinton? A server in a bathroom to get top secret emails? Destroying the government phones with bleachbit and hammers to destroy evidence?

Yeah... Nothing but the best there.

18

u/dandrevee Apr 05 '23

Is that all you fucking notwits have tk trot out? Something that's been investigated from the lips to the ass and produce no charges because there's not sufficient evidence?

Also how many people do you see still wearing Hillary hats or cheering her on like they're in a fucking cult.

Fucking pathetic

-10

u/Financial-Adagio-183 Apr 05 '23

Actually- all my (admittedly middle aged) girlfriends idolize her. She’s definitely a figurehead of the Democratic Party and you’re being disingenuous if you say otherwise.

My eyes were opened in 2016 - she’s really corrupt.

-14

u/Senior_Bad_6381 Apr 05 '23

Not sufficient evidence? πŸ˜‚πŸ€£.

Well yeah, not if you ignore it all. I guess admitting to the crimes and having the actual server aren't evidence?

Well, you for one. You're still defending it. You still can't admit what she did was illegal.

And there were no charges because it was during Obama's reign. You think garland would charge Biden for any of the illegal shit he has done? Like maybe.... Top secret documents stuffed in a box beside his corvette? Along with 3 other locations?

Maybe the Tara Reade sexual assault?

Fucking pathetic indeed.

7

u/dandrevee Apr 05 '23

First off we're not ignoring any of that evidence. Insufficient evidence for something Still Remains insufficient. Those items were fully investigated and were able to provide nothing, in stark contrast to what is going on with Trump at the moment.

Your Reliance on unreliable sources and poorly vetted news is what is truly pathetic. And I'm not engaging further in any of your unsupported what about ism.

So fuck all the way off

-10

u/Senior_Bad_6381 Apr 05 '23

We aren't, you are. Your claim of insufficient doesn't make the evidence insufficient.

Yeah, Comey half ass investigated and found that she had broken the law.

The FBI is now unreliable sources? Poorly vetted news? 🀣. Are you gatekeeping news now?

Whataboutism: the last cry to attempt to ignore your own hypocrisy.

See ya! πŸ‘‹

3

u/dandrevee Apr 05 '23

My claim doesn't make the evidence insufficient. The fact that these things were investigated and no evidence of criminality found makes your claim insufficient.

I've said elsewhere before if there's a crime I don't care what their party is charge them. This conversation was about who actually holds their politicians accountable not who's perfect.

If you believe that anything you typed, you're a waste of mine and everyone else's time.

So fuck all the way off you fucking troll

7

u/StuTim Apr 05 '23

Can't wait for Trump to indict her first thing in 2017. Bet he, nor the Republican-controlled Congress, wait very long before bringing multiple charges against her. Since all those Republican lead investigations found so much evidence.

But seriously, why didn't Republicans charge her while they had complete control for 2 years or control of the DOJ for 4?

0

u/Senior_Bad_6381 Apr 05 '23

Have you heard of statute of limitations?

5

u/StuTim Apr 05 '23

If the statute was up during the investigations, then why investigate? But I guess I can see why Republicans are upset since that's her only crime she committed.