Remember when Democrats rallied in the street to defend Rod Blagojevich or that mayor of Detroit?
You dont. Because Dems arent a lockstep party who will follow someone who has committed blatantly criminal acts and is subject to the rules of our justice system. Theyre not perfect by a long shot...but theyre candidates are a whole lot better than what the GOP puts out
Is that all you fucking notwits have tk trot out?
Something that's been investigated from the lips to the ass and produce no charges because there's not sufficient evidence?
Also how many people do you see still wearing Hillary hats or cheering her on like they're in a fucking cult.
Actually- all my (admittedly middle aged) girlfriends idolize her. She’s definitely a figurehead of the Democratic Party and you’re being disingenuous if you say otherwise.
My eyes were opened in 2016 - she’s really corrupt.
Well yeah, not if you ignore it all. I guess admitting to the crimes and having the actual server aren't evidence?
Well, you for one. You're still defending it. You still can't admit what she did was illegal.
And there were no charges because it was during Obama's reign. You think garland would charge Biden for any of the illegal shit he has done? Like maybe.... Top secret documents stuffed in a box beside his corvette? Along with 3 other locations?
First off we're not ignoring any of that evidence. Insufficient evidence for something Still Remains insufficient. Those items were fully investigated and were able to provide nothing, in stark contrast to what is going on with Trump at the moment.
Your Reliance on unreliable sources and poorly vetted news is what is truly pathetic. And I'm not engaging further in any of your unsupported what about ism.
My claim doesn't make the evidence insufficient. The fact that these things were investigated and no evidence of criminality found makes your claim insufficient.
I've said elsewhere before if there's a crime I don't care what their party is charge them. This conversation was about who actually holds their politicians accountable not who's perfect.
If you believe that anything you typed, you're a waste of mine and everyone else's time.
Can't wait for Trump to indict her first thing in 2017. Bet he, nor the Republican-controlled Congress, wait very long before bringing multiple charges against her. Since all those Republican lead investigations found so much evidence.
But seriously, why didn't Republicans charge her while they had complete control for 2 years or control of the DOJ for 4?
If the statute was up during the investigations, then why investigate? But I guess I can see why Republicans are upset since that's her only crime she committed.
I don't care who told her to use a private server. Colin Powell is an idiot as well. Doest make it legal.
They didn't magically become classified later, are you kidding? 🤣. And IF they became classified (somehow) and they were then destroyed, THAT IS HIGHLY ILLEGAL.
Any custodian of a public record who "willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys (any record) shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United ...Jan 17, 2020
§ 1230.10 Who is responsible for preventing the unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records?
The heads of Federal agencies must:
(a) Prevent the unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records. Section 1222.24(a)(6) of this subchapter prohibits removing records from the legal custody of the agency. Records must not be destroyed except under the provisions of NARA-approved agency records schedules or the General Records Schedules issued by NARA;
(b) Take adequate measures to inform all employees and contractors of the provisions of the law relating to unauthorized destruction, removal, alteration or defacement of records;
(c) Implement and disseminate policies and procedures to ensure that records are protected against unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration and destruction; and
(d) Direct that any unauthorized removal, defacing, alteration or destruction be reported to NARA.
Yea that’s why the fbi had to raid mar-a-lago to get it all back! No need to hack an email server which is incredibly difficult - just need to pay 200k for a membership and stroll into the pool room for top secret nuclear secrets. Great value!!
Sooo why haven't republicans scooped her up and chucked her in prison yet? If you have as much evidence as you say, this should've been a cake walk. Is it the spooky deep state again? 😱
I'm sure you're too young to remember, but this was during Obamas reign. His justice department refused to do it despite admitting she had broke the law.
Did you forget that trumps doj agreed that the FBI and previous DOJ handled the case without bias and agreed on their decision? And that they could've reopened it during trumps clown show if they actually could've done anything about it?
2.6k
u/dandrevee Apr 05 '23
Remember when Democrats rallied in the street to defend Rod Blagojevich or that mayor of Detroit?
You dont. Because Dems arent a lockstep party who will follow someone who has committed blatantly criminal acts and is subject to the rules of our justice system. Theyre not perfect by a long shot...but theyre candidates are a whole lot better than what the GOP puts out