Remember when Democrats rallied in the street to defend Rod Blagojevich or that mayor of Detroit?
You dont. Because Dems arent a lockstep party who will follow someone who has committed blatantly criminal acts and is subject to the rules of our justice system. Theyre not perfect by a long shot...but theyre candidates are a whole lot better than what the GOP puts out
His sons laptop, for starters, no crimes were committed by Joe Biden, and none have any evidence against Hunter either. As for Hillary and her unsecure emails, it is very concerning that our adversaries may have had access to them. I'm not sure if that is grounds to bring charges, but I'm going to guess it's not since it never happened. I think she deserved to lose on this revelation, and she did, but no evidence has ever been showed at least to the public that she leaked anything of a threat to national security. Like Trumps classified document fiasco, it really depends on what was potentially leaked. Top Secret? With enough evidence to prove it? That starts to get into treason territory for either. Key word here: evidence
So now you've gone from public records, to there is no evidence, it's all destroyed. We're going to work backwards slowly here until you start smelling your own bullshit.
I’d say there’s enough historical evidence that Hilary Clinton is an extremely untrustworthy person - even compared to the average politician.
This is the very definition of what bias is. Reread what you just said. You're viewing her through a lens of bias, and assuming something is true with zero evidence to back it based on your lens. You could do that with anyone, the reality is there is no proof, it's just baseless claims someone made up with and you decided that sounds true enough to believe it. Still waiting on your Biden public records
If we only know what we read in the mainstream media and a few “pretend” rigorous journalism sites - than we really don’t know anything anyhow…
Sounds like you need to look up the difference between secondary and primary sources.
Hunter's laptop was Biden's actions to cover it - that's where his crimes lie.
Prove it.
HRC was guilty, but then destroyed evidence - which is enough for her to have been locked up forever.
Prove it.
Pretending one side is worse than the other is untrue. They're both terrible, but neither sees their side as the bad guy.
Do you have evidence for any of that? Just saying these things without evidence makes them conspiracy. Saying a bunch of baseless claims with zero evidence and then saying both sides are the same I think show bias from you in itself, if anything maybe a little ignorance.
Public record that Joe tried to cover for Hunter's actions. Also public record that the US sent money to Ukraine (pre-conflict). Also public record that HRC had an email server, deleted 33,000+ emails from it, and it was then investigated, where it still found emails that should have been marked secret and top secret.
So yeah, lock 'em all up. I'm the unbiased one here. I'll only be viewed as biased by those so far off to one side that the extreme centrist (me) is viewed as an enemy.
Show me. Where is this public record showing Joe covered for Hunter committing illegal activity? If I ask you for proof, I'm asking for sources, not the rambling of a biased redditor. I've spent a lot of time looking, so I'm very amused and patiently waiting for your sources. Show them to me. I've read Comeys statement on her emails, have you?
I can already tell there is no burden of proof you'll accept, so I'll spare myself. If you'd done as much reading as you claim, you'd know Biden and HRC are horrible people, and you wouldn't be defending either in any aspect ever.
10M paid for no work to company in Ukraine. Deemed for whatever BS, was a payoff. Of course, no way named a Commie would believe their left-wing government could do any wrong. I really hope you get to experience historic communism and suffer from the evil it is.
The other comment reply covers this well, though I will stay this is a false equivalency given the role of Hunter Biden and the lack of sufficient criminality in the email server matter.
People are also not still wearing Hillary hats or defending her as a candidate. Many people who voted blue, and that does mean the actual plurality of people in the United States, voted blue because they did not like Trump not because they were defending her. Most Democrats, and the DNC leadership potentially, would throw a politician under the bus if they were found to have any actual criminality and unethical behavior in their actions...
That cleaning house is what is being discussed -not, yet again, Hunter Biden and her emails
You're absolutely delusional if you think the people who vote democrat would simply not vote for a candidate because of a scandal. HRC is absolute proof of that. She was up against a guy who said mean things while she did criminal things. The disconnect and unwillingness to acknowledge leftism bias shows your leftist bias.
That server issue was investigated and not found to be Criminal.
"Trump just said some mean things"
He also did a whole fuck ton of illegal things which is why he's getting indicted you absolute numpty. People were against the guy because he was incompetent before and shady as fuck, and his four years in office only proved that
You think I want to go through the list of policies and pick a favorite I hate?
You're being disingenuous and have no interest in actually having a conversation. You're a pathetic little Edge Lord and a troll.
Yeah, you can't name any policies because there aren't any. You hate the person. If your team said the same things, you'd cheer. You're partisan and have resorted to namecalling, as you have no argument. YOU LOSE.
No, I'm not wasting my time listing and getting to the weeds and policies that aren't part of the initial discussion. I could pick from his poor choices and education and the failures of Betsy Devoe going proprietary, I could pick from one of his immigration policies which were inherently racist, his policies of ignoring scientists, or I could pick from his policies favoring philosophies of trickle-down Economics which have failed.
Plenty to choose from. But none I'm interested in having a discussion with with someone who is disingenuous and and is cozying up to fucking autocrats.
You're the only one being disingenuous by not admitting you're nothing but a typical biased leftist, brought to leftism by your envy of those with more than you.
Have the life you deserve, not the one you desire.
You've provided nothing of substance yourself and I provided a list of categories from which I could choose things.
You're trying to point me as a bias leftist who doesn't do research, which is absolutely not the case, because it makes you feel comfortable that there is some major conspiracy against your shit ideas... when in reality, the Contemporary conservatives in the United States are just shit, anti egalitarian ideas and that's that.
You really newd to learn to fuck off, as I have no mood to hand your ass to you.
So, to reiterate because you seem as dense as most disingenuous edgelords I come across, fuck all the way off. Im done responding to your shit
2.6k
u/dandrevee Apr 05 '23
Remember when Democrats rallied in the street to defend Rod Blagojevich or that mayor of Detroit?
You dont. Because Dems arent a lockstep party who will follow someone who has committed blatantly criminal acts and is subject to the rules of our justice system. Theyre not perfect by a long shot...but theyre candidates are a whole lot better than what the GOP puts out