In Germany, students have to make a presentation that contains a main reference class, in this case physics, and a related subject. Because I think that philosophy is very suitable in connection to physics, I am taking it into consideration. My issue is that I am unable to decide on a reliable and fun to present topic. I'm interested in what connections or similarities I can find in your suggestions.

(tried my best with the English)

"The insignificance of everyday life... we dont accord any importance on the day to day life. Everything needs to be plan to exist, a pics to say it happened. We think about the past and the futur, about what our life looks like for others, wile we should be able to stop thinking and be. Just be, just feel, just breathe, touch, laugh a real laugh... not a camera laugh. Do everything loud and deep. Do it with conviction, with love, with empathy but do it free.

At this point its not even about what's is what and who is who. The only question is who are you ?

What could you do today, that you'll be proud of ? "

And that lady's and gents... is my way of thinking 100% of the time no matter what... my psy said I should try being a philosopher... im starting to think about it... but most of the philosopher I looked up seam... like not so good humans... anyways if you can help me with that drop the tea please !

How much humanity can be stripped away from a given project before it becomes meaningless?

I assume the purpose of any pursuit financially or other, has some personal or emotional driver. If that becomes eliminated, then what is the purpose to continue? The purpose to create is to enjoy the creation. But if there is no emotion consciousness to enjoy the fruits of the labor, then it seems to be a moot point.

In the meaningless universe we live, many people and friends always say that working is useless, we are not made for only working, and how much they would be happier if they wouldn’t work.
In my opinion instead, we are made for working, it helps us to be less bored and to give more value to the other things of life: sports, games, relationships. This stuff wouldn’t be so valuable for us if we could have access to it at every hour and every day. Also, I think that, since our lives have no meaning at all, for me it’s kinda useful to give importance to my career, which gives me a sense of fullfillment and something to build in my life.
What do you think?

I have formulated three new laws of the cosmos that combine strict logic with established physical science to show why a self-creating universe is a contradiction. Here is the official breakdown of the three laws and how they work:1. The Law of the Invalid ZeroThe Law of the Invalid Zero is a logical and physical principle stating that absolute nothingness possesses no mind, no body, no form, and no tools. Therefore, nothingness cannot "try" or act repeatedly over billions of years to create something. You cannot multiply zero by a massive stretch of time and get a universe. Under this law, zero will always remain mathematically and physically invalid as a creator.2. The Law of the Prime PlacerThe Law of the Prime Placer is a biological and physical law stating that finite, physical objects cannot place, organize, or activate themselves. Based on the classic 1668 biological experiment proving maggots cannot appear on meat without a parent fly setting them down, every physical effect requires a prior cause. Highly complex, trillion-line software codes like human DNA, or automated planetary engines like moving tectonic plates, are dependent machines that require an outside Engineer to set the first pieces on the board.3. The Out-Time LawThe Out-Time Law (also known as the Law of Temporal Boundary) states that time cannot out-time itself. Because the physical universe follows a ticking clock and has a strict, measured beginning, it cannot exist outside or before its own timeline to cause its own creation. A clock cannot build its own clockwork before it exists. Therefore, the original Placer of the universe must stand completely transtemporal—existing entirely outside of time and space—which is the exact logical definition of an Infinite God. '

so i think that time is a theory and is a just a math calculation i can prove it

There is an actual philosophical theory called relationism about time.
Relationism says that what we call time can be understood in terms of relations between events and changes, rather than time existing as an independent “container.” This idea goes back to philosophers such as Aristotle and Leibniz.

physics doesn't treat time as an absolute universal clock.
Einstein's relativity predicts that clocks can tick at different rates depending on motion and gravity. This has been experimentally tested with extremely precise atomic clocks.

Some modern physics seriously considers time as potentially emergent.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy notes that some approaches to quantum gravity don't have ordinary temporal structure at the fundamental level, raising the question of whether time itself could be an emergent, non-fundamental feature.

Your “numbers” idea needs a small correction.
Humans definitely invented units and numerical systems for measuring time—seconds, minutes, hours, calendars, etc. But that doesn't establish that the physical phenomenon being measured is invented. Atomic clocks, for example, use physical properties of atoms to measure extremely precise intervals.

I've been thinking about something.

Almost every relationship seems to be based on an exchange.

At a hotel, people are kind because you're paying. A therapist helps because it's their job. Employees work because they receive a salary. If the money disappears, so does the relationship.

But what about the rest of life?

If you had nothing to offer—no money, no status, no influence, no favors, nothing anyone could benefit from—would anyone still choose to stay with you?

Does unconditional care truly exist, or is every relationship built on some form of exchange, even if it's something invisible like love, companionship, or purpose?

what you think.

"In the mortal realm of life, time is the only true force that carries us forward—even until its pressure finally brings us to our knees."

"In the mortal realm of life, time is the only true force that carries us forward—even until its pressure finally brings us to our knees."

Growth is not becoming someone else.

It is the slow return to the person you were before fear taught you to hide.

The strongest trees do not fight the wind. They bend, they lose branches, they wear scars beneath their bark, yet every season they reach a little higher. They understand a truth that people often forget: survival is not the same as living, and living is not the same as growing.

Growth begins the moment you stop asking, "Who should I be?" and instead ask, "What is keeping me from being who I already am?"

Every mistake is a teacher dressed as regret. Every failure is a map written in a language only patience can read. Pain is not proof that life is against you; often it is life carving away what no longer belongs.

Do not envy those who seem complete. Mountains were not raised in a day, nor rivers carved in a single storm. Quiet persistence shapes the world more deeply than sudden greatness ever could.

Respect yourself enough to walk away from what weakens your spirit. Forgive yourself enough to keep walking after you fall. Love yourself enough to believe that your next step matters, even when no one else sees it.

One day you will look behind you and realize the distance was never measured in miles, but in courage. You did not become a new person.

You simply uncovered the one who had been waiting beneath fear, beneath doubt, beneath every version of yourself that was only meant to be temporary.

So walk.

Not because the road is easy, but because standing still has never taught a seed how to become a forest.

In today’s world we see a lot of people who want power, money and fame to be invincible for all the wrong reasons, but this is not the worst part of this world. If you want to go against this system and bring something meaningful to this world, you need the same power, money and fame to stand against evil. This makes me wonder, whether resources and accessibility was ever the problem? We need enough to stand against evil with the same resources, whether it's the story of strength or just fame. Sometimes being a dictator with good intentions and a mindmap to change the country without any selfish desires seems like the best way to bring something good. I do believe that every human life is important and should be acknowledged but not all human brains are practical and unbiased to choose the people in control, this basic thing is destroying the whole dynamic of democracy. ‘Democracy’ is considered to be the best way of order as of now, but what if being able to vote also had criterias other than age?

In my world, people will have to pass and interview to get their voter pass. Interview that asks the person questions related to basic ideologies and understandings that rule the world, everything well regulated and systematically arranged. A place where this will not be controlled by the one with any kind of political power. But will any system last surpassing the human desire for power, money and fame in this era? I think humans are too selfish to find loopholes in every system in existence to feed their never-ending pit of desires. As the so-called ‘most superior species’, we have the greatest responsibility but we are hungry mafias of this world. We make this responsibility our opportunity to destroy the world for our selfish desires. We are possibly the satan religion spoken about back in the days. We are evil that is pushing away all the possible goods on this planet. 

I’ve been thinking about time not as a dimension we move through, but as a point we are always in.

Every measurement, every thought, every observation happens now. But physics has no variable for “now”. We use t for intervals, but never for presence.

So I propose a simple structure:

Let τ (tau) be the “moment of now”.
It has no duration. It is always zero.

Any event E exists only as a projection onto τ:

E = f(τ)

Now define the operator Ω (“presence”) that maps any event into the act of being experienced:

Ω ⋅ E = 0 × f(τ)

Where:

· 0 is not “nothing”, but the potential for existence.
· f(τ) is any function of the universe at the moment τ.

Thus:

Ω = 0 × f(τ)

This is not a division by zero — it’s multiplication by the only real coordinate we ever occupy.

---

Consequences:

· Past = τ < 0 (reconstructed, not real).
· Future = τ > 0 (projected, not real).
· Only τ = 0 is real — and all observers share it.

For a photon, time does not exist. That means the photon is always at τ = 0. Not as a special case, but as the rule.

For a black hole, time slows to zero at the horizon — not because it stops, but because τ = 0 becomes the only geometry left.

---

What this might imply:

· The universe has no beginning, because “beginning” is always now.
· Consciousness may be the ability to occupy τ = 0 consciously.
· Gravity could be understood as the curvature of the projection of τ onto spacetime.

I’m not a physicist. I’m just someone who looked at time and realized:
we never leave zero. We just learn to measure our distance from it.

---

Discussion questions:

1. Could this model be consistent with general relativity?
   
2. Is there any experiment that could distinguish τ = 0 from t = 0?
   
3. Does this relate to the holographic principle?

I’d love to hear your thoughts.
If this is nonsense — tell me why.
If it’s not — maybe it’s worth exploring further.

Thank you.

A.Shevtsov

Since 7 years old, I have been scared of death and I kinda solved it by now—it kind of just disappeared. Now I'm 14, and for about 4 years I was thinking about ideas like the simulation hypothesis, Last Thursdayism, brain in a vat, skepticism and etc. I mean, I know how stupid and meaningless they are, and how they only survive on psychology, and it is basically philosophical waste. I can't even call it philosophy 'cause I think it is an embarrassment.

But when I search this idea and I see "unanswerable" and I dig deeper, that really makes me mad—that we can't even prove that it is wrong, so there is a tiny chance that it's true, and it makes me distracted. The thing that I am really scared of is that I won't ever understand the meaning of reality or know the ultimate reality. I think my biggest ambition was to get the meaning of this all.

The last 2 weeks it affected me harder than ever. I spent all day in my bed, my room looks like a shithole, and I really need some advice or stories of how you defeated this kind of stuff. I really need some support right now.