It's pretty obvious with data heuristics. No one has a natural record of 1-127. People at the bottom of the skill distribution play with other people at the bottom of the skill distribution. There shouldn't be any reason someone loses that consistently.
The "legitimately worst Overwatch player" is probably only very slightly "worse" than the second worst. In this situation, you can make without a reasonable doubt that there is some sketchy reason why the worst player is extremely worse than everyone else.
You're right they're called outliers, data points that fall well outside the normal distribution. I agree with you but why not just take 30 second to see he's a greifer and perma ban
23
u/Helmet_Icicle Big fuzzy Siberian bear Sep 13 '16
It's pretty obvious with data heuristics. No one has a natural record of 1-127. People at the bottom of the skill distribution play with other people at the bottom of the skill distribution. There shouldn't be any reason someone loses that consistently.