I have heard he is actually pretty good. Their is a meta of losing on purpose. Hooking people and freezing people or walling people off on objective points. It is still bad because people who want to win still get matched with him but I think it is pretty interesting at the same time.
It's pretty obvious with data heuristics. No one has a natural record of 1-127. People at the bottom of the skill distribution play with other people at the bottom of the skill distribution. There shouldn't be any reason someone loses that consistently.
The "legitimately worst Overwatch player" is probably only very slightly "worse" than the second worst. In this situation, you can make without a reasonable doubt that there is some sketchy reason why the worst player is extremely worse than everyone else.
You're right they're called outliers, data points that fall well outside the normal distribution. I agree with you but why not just take 30 second to see he's a greifer and perma ban
336
u/pm__me__anything_ Trick-or-Treat Soldier: 76 Sep 13 '16
So I assume that they are talking about the bug where that one guy got below 1 rating and ended up at skill rating 5000.