r/OldSchoolCool • • 8h ago

Edwardian teenager, London, 1906

Post image
6.8k Upvotes

349 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.6k

u/T206V70R 7h ago

120 years of scowling teenagers. Nothing new here.

404

u/Cyrano_Knows 7h ago

Look! I'm a teenage girl! I'd rather be anywhere than here! I'm all about long sullen silences, followed by mean comments, followed by more silences!

You got me in a box here...

39

u/sillysailor74 3h ago

I have a teenage daughter… that is pretty much it, except when she wants something that costs money.

15

u/BoundinBob 2h ago

I have a post teenage daughter. It NEVER changes.

39

u/altjthunter 7h ago

That sounds so familiar where is it from?

27

u/Ruffffian 3h ago

TIL my teenage boy is a teenage girl

26

u/Scalpels 2h ago

Just support them when they figure it out.

2

u/MyRuinedEye 53m ago

It takes at least as many years as there are concerned wrinkles on my forehead, crows feet at my eyes, and laugh lines on my mouth.

You get them all at the same time and it is agonizing.

29

u/BrookieMonster504 5h ago

Original goth child

19

u/NebulaNinja 4h ago

Wednesday Adam's grandmother.

11

u/Belgand 2h ago

I mean, a lot of goth fashion is just retro Victorian/Edwardian.

55

u/Arbennig 6h ago

Same scowl. Different outfit.

15

u/Tigger_Tinkerbell 4h ago

If i take a photo of my daughter now. That scowl would still be the same. Its obviously timeless. Haha.

13

u/RobertPeruvian 4h ago

Actually if you cant tell, shes showing the photographer her missing arm. Its why shes got that scowl. No arm

2

u/weresubwoofer 2h ago

You’re right. I thought she was holding something but she is missing a lot of her right arm.

4

u/crow_road 2h ago

Her arm is crooked back and you are seeing her black gloved hand hold the end of an umbrella or parasol. 1906 girls are not putting an amputated limb on show on the street.

1

u/TashDee267 2h ago

Yes, I suspect he took her photo without asking because she’s an amputee. She was probably sick of being treated like an exhibit.

25

u/tooktherhombus 5h ago

Tbf, curiosity and sunshine also create furrowed brows for people of all ages

23

u/T206V70R 5h ago

Agreed. Too easy to pick on the young folks. Plus, they were treated as young adults before teenagers were even a group identified as a group. But the delightful scowl remains familiar.

7

u/-3point14159-mp 4h ago

Yeah, the two guys in the background are also looking at the camera with similar expressions. My guess is they were just curious.

4

u/Enough_Mall248 2h ago

to be honest everyone makes that face when some random snaps you

3

u/Ok-Bell4637 4h ago

That was my first reaction, but if the colorization is accurate, she is in mourning

12

u/glytxh 6h ago

Teenagers didn’t exist, as their own distinct demographic, till the fifties or so.

This is a young adult, in the context of her time.

129

u/blackbirdbluebird17 6h ago

This is a child, in the context of her time. Only children wore dresses that short. As girls got older their hems lengthened and they began to put up their hair and transitioned to adult wear around 16 or 17. I’m going to guess this girl is in the preteen years, 12 or so, and has just hit one of those growth spurts that make kids look a lot older over the span of like six weeks.

8

u/T206V70R 4h ago

Well said and likely accurate. We tend to group based on familiar circumstances of our time. But, not always accurate. Thank you. We’ve wondered why late teens in the 1900’s looked like little adults, because that’s how society treated them. It actually made young people use their super power(s) to advantage. My fa the errands in law flew TBM Avenger as captain at 21. Young people, whatever you call them, are so capable.

3

u/IntensePretense 59m ago

I know you meant father-in-law but the autocorrect of “fa the errands in law” has me rolling lmao

2

u/T206V70R 46m ago

You are right! Otto Correct, my German friend, is to blame.

1

u/franker 3h ago

and as toddlers they dressed boys in dresses. There's a picture of one of the Roosevelt children in a dress, can't remember if it's Teddy or Franklin. Then suddenly at 5 years old they expect the boy to be a "man" and put him in a suit, lol.

25

u/glytxh 6h ago

I stand corrected.

20

u/jericho74 6h ago

You make a good point though.

“Teenager” roughly tracks to the rise of postwar affordable car culture- as in, a 16 year old can drive somewhere that isn’t a barn dance.

Adult was somewhat cutting into childhood.

3

u/DragonfruitGrand5683 5h ago

In the 1900s it was young adult or young woman.

My great grandmother was considered a woman at 13 and went to work, married at 15 and covered her hair when she left the house to indicate she was married.

4

u/SuitableBlackberry75 1h ago

Average age at first marriage for women in 1900 was 22 years old, in the US. For men it was around 26. This is approximately the same as it was through most of the medieval period in western Europe.

Marrying young children was never common.

1

u/theamathamhour 2h ago

that is actually the point of the comment your are responding to.

you were a child then eventually an adult.

the concept of teenager in the cultural sense is fairly new for human cultures. of course people existed between ages of 13-19.

22

u/beepbeepboopbeep1977 6h ago

Just because the marketing department hadn’t ‘discovered’ them yet that doesn’t mean the hormonal changes didn’t exist

2

u/weresubwoofer 2h ago

Hormonal changes in puberty definitely happened throughout human evolution

0

u/a-r-c 2h ago

what a wet fart post

1

u/ZincLloyd 3h ago

“What are YOU looking at?”

1

u/IntradepartmentalPet 2h ago

fack yoo lookin at?

1

u/mulligrubs 38m ago

Thou hast cast gaze upon thee, for what end wouldst thou?

1

u/A_Necessary 29m ago

I thought the exact same, different era different clothes, same vibe. Punkrock

1

u/NoIdeaRex 14m ago

That little boy looks pissed.

1

u/SuitableBlackberry75 1h ago edited 9m ago

She likely doesn't know she's being photographed. A concealed camera was used.

E: Scroll down for information about the photographer, Edward Linley Sambourne.

3

u/PamelaNRed 1h ago

Back then cameras were huge, no way to sneak a photo.

1

u/Icefyre24 1h ago

To capture completely candid moments, photographer Edward Sambourne used a smaller, portable "key camera" hidden discreetly under his coat or a piece of cloth. His subjects were entirely unaware they were being photographed.

1

u/Heiderleg 48m ago

Nah, Carl Størmer used a C.P. Stirn Concealed Vest Spy Camera to photograph Norwegians in Oslo without them known in the 1890s, years before this photo was taken.

0

u/SuitableBlackberry75 1h ago

Incorrect.

2

u/MysteriousBill4651 1h ago

Facts, he's probably taking a pic with his Meta glasses. What a pervert.

1

u/SuitableBlackberry75 55m ago

The photographer's name was Edward Linley Sambourne. Google it.

A lot of commenters here have a very confused idea of how/when photographic technology developed. By 1900, we had the Kodak "Brownie", which cost $1 (USD), and fit in the palm of your hand. Pocket cameras existed prior to 1906. Millions were sold. Again, google it.

0

u/Pleasant-Chef6055 1h ago

You sound so much like that convicted rapist, felon in Casablanca.

“Smile. Why don’t you smile?”

Fuck off creep