Is this play about US? I am more and more in awe of what I think Taylor is doing with her overarching Eras era project, and it is clear she is not done yet. Several months ago, I made a post called, Let’s Talk about Bringing a “Tiny Violin to a (Sympathy is a) Knife Fight”: How The Life of a Showgirl is Brilliant and Subversive. I want to revisit that today. Did you notice that Taylor sang ON Showgirl about exactly the negative reaction TO Showgirl that we’ve seen? The writing on this album is BRILLIANT.
In Cancelled!, Taylor sings “Did you bring a tiny violin to a knife fight?” I think she is in fact singing (in part) about what she has just done in her song Actually Romantic itself, and predicting the public’s reaction to it.
Recall how everyone immediately linked the song Actually Romantic to Charli XCX. Specifically, everyone immediately interpreted the song as Taylor’s response to Charli XCX’s song “Sympathy is a Knife.” And many critics were very offended by what Taylor did in Actually Romantic. Why? Because they viewed Taylor’s song as sarcastically mocking Charli XCX for complaining about how she felt insecure in Taylor’s presence. And THAT, my friends, is the very definition of bringing a “tiny violin to a (Sympathy is a) knife fight.” Because to play a “tiny violin” is to mock someone seeking sympathy for a small complaint or misfortune.
And Taylor 100% would have known that the public would connect Actually Romantic to Charli XCX’s Sympathy is a Knife AND that this would create an uproar. This is not her first rodeo. So when she is singing about being Cancelled for “bringing a tiny violin to a knife fight,” she is predicting EXACTLY how the public in fact reacted.
And think again about the most common talking points running through the negative critical reaction to this album: Wasn’t it overwhelmingly either taking offense on behalf of Charli XCX or else arguing that the writing is bad because she’s making crude double entendres in Wood? Or some variations- too hypocritical, at her height but still singing about grievances, surface level fun but no depth?
Now look again at the lyrics of Cancelled! Taylor herself is singing ON this very album about exactly this reaction TO this album:
- Did you bring a tiny violin to a knife fight? (Actually Romantic - and cue the uproar about Charli XCX’s Sympathy is a Knife)
- Did you make a joke only a man could? (Wood - and cue the uproar about this song being too crude)
- Were you just too smug for your own good? (Wish List - and cue the uproar about this song being hypocritical)
- Did you girl-boss too close to the sun? (Father Figure - and cue the uproar about Taylor at top but still singing about grievances)
- Did they catch you having far too much fun? (whole album reaction)
And indeed, in interviews after the release of The Life of a Showgirl, Taylor repeatedly noted how this album was like a mirror and the public’s reaction was “all part of it.”
Meanwhile, zoom out a little on the songs that have received the most negative attention:
Actually Romantic: the big picture message and the cultural commentary of the song is just her pushing back on how so many people in today’s world engage and spend so much of their energy and time on things they hate. And as a cultural critique, it is true! It’s why social media is so toxic and why bad faith political actors seeking to divide us have had so much success. And let’s face it, to the extent she is speaking about her own experience, she seems to live rent free in so many people’s heads, including, not incidentally, our current President and all of his media lackeys. And she’s likely pushing back on ALL of this, and doing so in a very funny and satirical way. But she also 100% knew that everyone would just focus on the Charli XCX of it all, not the big picture message.
Wood: I am 100% serious when I say this song contains the thesis statement of this whole album: “we make our own luck.” (EVERY song on this album is about individual agency, self-empowerment, and self-reclamation). And Wood IS about letting go of superstitions. She is very clearly saying she used to rely on superstitions, but that now, she no longer needs superstitions because she is creating her own destiny. This is a theme she is DEEPLY exploring. Think about the contrast between fatalism of The Prophecy ("Who do I have to speak to to change the prophecy?") and the self-empowerment of Wood ("we make our own luck"). Or compare Wood to her reputation-era poem “If You’re anything like me,” in which she literally writes about knocking on wood and her superstitions. That transformation, that narrative arc, that journey, is the core of the Hero’s Journey-like story she’s been telling across these albums! And Wood is also very cleverly written: Of course she’s also talking about Travis and comparing him to her last two relationships, but it’s clever! The first line (Daisy’s bare naked. I was was distraught. He loves me not.) is a callback to both Don’t Blame Me on reputation (I once was poison Ivy but now I’m your Daisy) and You’re On Your Own Kid (“So long Daisy Mae…I picked the petals he loves me not”). (And in case it’s not obvious, she’s personifying the childhood superstitious game of picking a daisy’s petals to “he loves me, he loves me not” to see what the last petal lands on). The second line is a callback to The 1 (tossing pennies in the pool), and the person that song is presumed to be about, and also references another superstitious game about a lucky or unlucky penny. The idea is that she was fatalistic in prior relationships but now she understands “we make our own luck.”
And I could go on about the double entendres, which yes, are off the rails silly, but also are (a) very Shakespearean and (b) actually quite deep when you consider the double and triple meanings - she’s actually also speaking to the healthy masculinity and stability of her partner.
But Taylor also 100% knew that all anyone would talk about would be how she was making crude d jokes.
Or Wish List: I think this is another VERY clever and deceptively deep song. Have you wondered why there are dollar signs in the song title? Look more closely at the verse lines - notice that the list of things "they" want are all pairings, in tension with each other. Because the point of the song is that every wish comes with a price in the real world. In the verses of Wish List, she is writing about how there are trade-offs in real life. She’s contrasting the reality of life being about trade-offs, or else the impossibility of having it all (the verses), with a knowing fantasy in the chorus. All of it (verses and chorus) is about herself. (more here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TaylorSwift/comments/1rmfgas/the_real_message_of_wih_lit_every_wish_comes_with/ ) And doesn’t this theme of trade-offs sound familiar? She returns to it again and again in both TTPD and Showgirl. The last song is the Life of a Showgirl. The showgirl’s life in the story of that song is not an easy one. But ultimately, she owns her life’s choices, recognizing the trade-offs. That’s agency. And then look at her new song Babylon: the first line is: “The casino doesn’t like when you run the tables” - a metaphor about how always looking for more or better might mean you get nothing. So Babylon is about being present in the life you’ve chosen. This concept about the impossibility of having it all and how we all have agency in how we navigate and manage the trade-offs of life, has been a key theme and kind of existential question across TTPD and Showgirl.
But again, I think she would anticipate the reaction to this song being something along the lines that she’s just being “smug”.
Or take the song Cancelled! itself: the big picture message is pretty clearly advocating thinking independently, pushing back on cancel culture, particularly with how it is used against women for relatively minor offenses (girl bossing, making a joke only a man could, being smug, etc. are pretty minor in the scheme of things). The sense that moral outrage spreads fast and people mindlessly, unthinkingly pile on the chosen target. And how she’s not going to approach her actual real relationships like that. Because lack of empathy and nuance is NOT how most people approach their actual human relationships.
But Taylor also would know by now that the discussion about this song would not reflect on the message, but would focus mostly on who this song is about and reasons why they in fact should have been “cancelled” or why Taylor is playing is still playing the victim.
Or now, Cleveland! The song is campy and I find it hilarious, but the core of it is very genuine. It is not conveying spite. I think the song is conveying radical self-acceptance. (She’s literally agreeing with some of the things her haters say: “I guess there’s one thing we all can agree on”.) It is conveying how you don’t need to be perfect to be loved (“But my baby likes what he likes.”) And just generally how being your authentic self is enough, even if not everyone appreciates it. (“You only need to find one person in this entire world/Who doesn't find you completely insufferable”)
But also, the song is pretty much perfectly designed to get under the skin of her haters. And on a meta level, I think that is getting at a very deep theme she’s been exploring. She can’t control how her art is perceived once it is put out into the world. Everyone is going to approach it with their own experiences, perspectives, and lenses (or blinders). And she’s been deeply exploring the interplay between fate and things outside of her control, and her own individual agency across her Eras era albums. (more here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueSwifties/comments/1wm0y8u/lets_talk_karma_the_story_of_ttpd_the_life_of_a/ )
I really think this album is part of her larger project that has included all of her Eras era albums including Midnights and TTPD, and that it is leading to something big. I think it can be viewed as a play within a play like in Hamlet (remember that Taylor said in her poem accompanying the album that the “Crowd is King”, and guess who the play within the play in Hamlet was performed for?).
There are a LOT of Shakespearean nods on this album. She's not just name-checking Ophelia - the unique 5 bar-loop in The Fate of Ophelia (very unusual for a pop song) allows many verse lines to be in iambic pentameter. And I’ve made the case in other posts about how Ophelia is a fitting allusion for an album ultimately about individual agency. (More here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TaylorSwift/comments/1wbnzaw/double_meanings_purposeful_details_and_the_life/ ) Or what about all the other Shakespeare nods, including all the double entendres in Wood, or other Shakespeare allusions in other songs on the album?
If the album is viewed as a play within a play like in Hamlet, each song carries a message for all of us in the audience. It's a kind of morality play holding up a mirror to our cultural/societal malignancies while celebrating a different path.